Born in Bradford's Better Start: An experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions

BMC Public Health

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Dickerson, Josie ^a   Bird, Philippa K ^a   McEachan, Rosemary R C ^a   Pickett, Kate E ^b   Waiblinger, Dagmar ^a   Uphoff, Eleonora ^a   Mason, Dan ^a   Bryant, Maria ^a,c   Bywater, Tracey ^b   Bowyer Crane, Claudine ^b   Sahota, Pinki ^d   Small, Neil ^e   Howell, Michaela ^f   Thornton, Gill ^f   Astin, Melanie ^g   Lawlor, Debbie A ^h   Wright, John ^a  

^a BRADFORD INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f Bradford Trident   (United Kingdom)

^g BD4 Family   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Birth cohort; Child development; Child health; Communication; Early years interventions; Emotional; Inequalities; Language; Nutrition; Obesity; Quasi experimental; Social; Trials within cohort

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGLAND; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER; NEWBORN; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; OBESITY; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDS;

ADULT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; ENGLAND; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MOTHERS; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; OBESITY; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84985029328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. Our children deserve better: prevention pays. London: Department of Health; 2012.
2. Tickell D. The Early Years: Foundations for life, health and learning - An independent report on the Early Years Foundation Stage to Her Majesty's Government. London: Department for Education; 2011.
3. Allen G. Early intervention: The next steps - an independent report to Her Majesty's Government. London: Department for Education; 2011.
4. WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: commission on social determinants of health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
5. Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, Geddes I. Fair society, healthy lives: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London: The Marmot Review; 2010.
6. Axford N, Barlow J. What works: An overview of the best available evidence on giving children a better start. Dartington: The Social Research Unit at Dartington; 2013.
7. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995;274(22):1800-4.
8. Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. HTA. 1999;3(20):1-143.
9. Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.
10. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587-92.
11. Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C, Kearns A, Sparks L. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health. 2005;119(9):751-7.
12. Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Reeves B, Sutton M, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new MRC guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182-6.
13. Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014;2:3.
14. Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N, Fairley L, Lawlor DA, Parslow R, Petherick ES, et al. Cohort profile: The Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:978-91.
15. Relton C, Torgerson D, O'Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" design. BMJ. 2010;340.
16. Raynor P, Born in Bradford Collaborative G. Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:327.
17. Gov.uk Official Statistics: English indices of deprivation +; File 5: scores for the indices of deprivation, File 6: population denominators. Files combined to derive population weighted IMD scores by region. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015 Accessed 22/06/2016
18. Born in Bradford [ www.borninbradford.nhs.uk ]
19. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32(3):221.
20. (BAILII) BaILII: Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority. In: UKHL 7. 1985.
21. Johnston C, Liddle J. The Mental Capacity Act 2005: a new framework for healthcare decision making. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(2):94-7.
22. Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Data protection act. London: Stationery Office; 1998.
23. West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Des Jarlais DC, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, et al. Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1359-66.
24. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424.
25. Bor J, Moscoe E, Mutevedzi P, Newell M-L, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs in epidemiology: causal inference without randomized trials. Epidemiol. 2014;25(5):729-37.
26. Moscoe E, Bor J, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):132-43.
27. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
28. Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Sci. 2010;5:67.
29. Wanless D. Securing good health for the whole population. Final Report. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
30. Robling M, Bekkers M-J, Bell K, Butler CC, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Martin BC, Gregory JW, Hood K, Kemp A. Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (Building Blocks): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):146-55.
31. Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Chamberlin R, Tatelbaum R. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986;78(1):65-78.
32. Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum R, McConnochie KM, Sidora K, Luckey DW, Shaver D, et al. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(8):644-52.
33. Olds DL, Robinson J, O'Brien R, Luckey DW, Pettitt LM, Henderson Jr CR, Ng RK, Sheff KL, Korfmacher J, Hiatt S, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):486-96.
34. Office for National Statistics: Ward Level Mid-Year Population Estimates (experimental) 2014; source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/wardlevelmidyearpopulationestimatesexperimental Dataset used: Mid-2014: SAPE17DT8; accessed: 22/04/2016.
35. Office for National Statistics: Birth Summary Tables - England and Wales; source: http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/datasets/birthsummarytables Dataset used: 2014; accessed: 22/04/2016
36. Office for National Statistics, 2011 Census: Neighbourhood statistics, Ethnic Group, 2011 (KS201EW). Aggregated to derive 'Better Start Bradford'; sources: http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689850&c=bowling+and+barkerend&d=14&e=62&g=6369228&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464882068594&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689851&c=bradford+moor&d=14&e=62&g=6369232&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464882041781&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689863&c=little+horton&d=14&e=62&g=6369257&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464881977688&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. Accessed: 22/04/2016
37. Office for National Statistics: Births and infant deaths, England: 2012 to 2014; source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/adhocs/005621birthsandinfantdeathsengland2012to2014 Data used: 2014 Live births, 2014 Deaths Infant, derived rate per 1000 live births; accessed: 22/04/2016
38. Public Health England: National Dental Epidemiology Programme for England: oral health survey of five-year-old children 2012. A report on the prevalence and severity of dental decay. London; 2012 (Appendix 1): source: http://www.nwph.net/dentalhealth/survey-results5.aspx?id=1 Accessed: 22/04/2016
39. Public Health England: Electoral Ward and MSOA NCMP child obesity prevalence; source: http://www.noo.org.uk/visualisation Dataset used: Ward and MSOA obesity prevalence data - NCMP 2011/12 to 2013/14; accessed: 22/04/2016
40. Health & social Care Information Centre: National Child Measurement Programme - England, 2014-15; source: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?productid=19405&q=title%3a%22national+child+measurement+programme%22&sort=Relevance&size=10&page=1#top Dataset used: National Child Measurement Programme - England 2014-15: Tables [.xlsx]; accessed: 22/04/2016