The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Van Hoorn, Ralph ^a   Kievit, Wietske ^a   Booth, Andrew ^b   Mozygemba, Kati ^c   Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ^d   Refolo, Pietro ^e   Sacchini, Dario ^e   Gerhardus, Ansgar ^c   Van Der Wilt, Gert Jan ^f   Tummers, Marcia ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Information storage and retrieval methods; MEDLINE; Patient preferences; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDLINE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PUBMED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84984850969     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions - challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):542-5.
2. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Pollender H, Legare F. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):31-42.
3. Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407-12.
4. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6-8.
5. Lindhiem O, Bennett CB, Trentacosta CJ, McLear C. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(6):506-17.
6. Shingler SL, Bennett BM, Cramer JA, Towse A, Twelves C, Lloyd AJ. Treatment preference, adherence and outcomes in patients with cancer: literature review and development of a theoretical model. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(11):2329-41.
7. Elwyn G, Tilburt J, Montori V. The ethical imperative for shared decision-making. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2013;1(1):129-31.
8. Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MC, Marijnen CA, Stiggelbout AM. Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(6):875-82.
9. Montgomery AA, Fahey T. How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 1:i39-43.
10. Fraenkel L, Suter L, Cunningham CE, Hawker G. Understanding preferences for disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(8):1186-92.
11. Abraham NS, Naik AD, Street Jr RL, Castillo DL, Deswal A, Richardson PA, Hartman CM, Shelton Jr G, Fraenkel L. Complex antithrombotic therapy: determinants of patient preference and impact on medication adherence. Patient Preference Adherence. 2015;9:1657-68.
12. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436-8.
13. MacLean S, Mulla S, Akl EA, Jankowski M, Vandvik PO, Ebrahim S, McLeod S, Bhatnagar N, Guyatt GH, American College of Chest P. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e1S-23.
14. Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2001;322(7285):519-23.
15. Brooker A-S, Carcone S, Witteman W, Krahn M. Quantitative patient preference evidence for health Technology Assessment: a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(03):290-300.
16. Muhlbacher AC. Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):591-7.
17. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(2):217-24.
18. Eiring O, Landmark BF, Aas E, Salkeld G, Nylenna M, Nytrøen K. What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disorders. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007848.
19. Opmeer BC, de Borgie CA, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM. Assessing preferences regarding healthcare interventions that involve non-health outcomes: an overview of clinical studies. Patient. 2010;3(1):1-10.
20. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Walter SD, Werre SR, Hedges T. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330(7501):1179.
21. Rodriguez RW. Delay in indexing articles published in major pharmacy practice journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(4):321-4.
22. PubMed PubReMiner. http://hgserver2.amc.nl/cgi-bin/miner/miner2.cgi. Accesssed 5 Mar 2014.
23. McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges T. Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline: a comparison of 38 published search filters. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(3):187-202.
24. Bachmann LM, Coray R, Estermann P, Ter Riet G. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(6):653-8.
25. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Sinclair JC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(6):447-58.
26. Wilczynski NL, Walker CJ, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE. In: Proceedings / the Annual Symposium on Computer Application [sic] in Medical Care Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1993. p. 601-5.
27. Hildebrand AM, Iansavichus AV, Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL, Mehta RL, Parikh CR, Garg AX. High-performance information search filters for acute kidney injury content in PubMed, Ovid Medline and Embase. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(4):823-32.
28. Brett Hauber A, Fairchild AO, Reed Johnson F. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(4):319-29.