Representational affordances and creativity in association-based systems

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 195-202

  Grace, Kazjon ^a   Gero, John ^b   Saunders, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; CREATIVE SYSTEMS; VISUAL DESIGN;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84984796617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Balazs, M. E., and Brown, D. C. 1998. A preliminary investigation of design simplification by analogy. In AI in Design Conference. Kluwer.
2. Boden, M. 1990. The Creative Mind. Abacus.
3. Colton, S. 2008. Creativity versus the perception of creativity in computational systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Creative Systems.
4. Davis, R.; Shrobe, H.; and Szolovits, P. 1993. What is a knowledge representation? AI Magazine 14(1):17-33.
5. French, R. 2002. The computational modeling of analogy-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(5):200-205.
6. Gaver, W. 1991. Technology affordances. In Robertson, S.; Olson, G.; and Olson, J., eds., Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching through Technology, 79-84.
7. Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7:155-170.
8. Gero, J., and Kannengiesser, U. 2012. Representational affordances in design, with examples from analogy making and optimization. Research in Engineering Design (to appear).
9. Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
10. Goel, A. 1997. Design, analogy, and creativity. IEEE Expert 12(3):62-70.
11. Goel, A. 2008. Analogical recognition of shape and structure in design drawings. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22:117-128.
12. Grace, K.; Gero, J.; and Saunders, R. 2012. Constructing computational associations between ornamental designs. In CAADRIA 2012. to appear.
13. Hofstadter, D., and the FARG. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14. Humbert, C. 1970. Ornamental Design. Thames and Hudson.
15. Jennings, K. E. 2010. Developing creativity: Artificial barriers in artificial intelligence. Mind and Machines 20(4):489-501.
16. Kokinov, B. 1998. Analogy is like cognition: dynamic, emergent, and context-sensitive. In Holyoak, K.; Gentner, D.; and Kokinov, B., eds., Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences. NBU Press. 96-105.
17. Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
18. Maher, M. L. 2010. Evaluating creativity in humans, computers, and collectively intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design. Lancaster, UK: Design Network.
19. Maier, J., and Fadel, G. 2009. Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design 20(1):13-27.
20. Markman, A., and Gentner, D. 1993. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 32(4):517-535.
21. Norman, D. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
22. Schön, D., and Wiggins, G. 1992. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2):135-156.
23. Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books.
24. Sternberg, R., and Lubart, T. 1999. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg, R., ed., The Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. 3-15.
25. Suwa, M.; Gero, J.; and Purcell, T. 1999. How an architect created design requirements. In Goldschmidt, G., and Porter, W., eds., Design Thinking Research Symposium: Design Representation, Volume 2. MIT Press. 101-124.
26. Wiggins, G. 2006. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems 19(7):449-458.