메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 17-

The quality of systematic reviews in dentistry: What is the quality of the available systematic reviews in dentistry?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84984779092     PISSN: 14620049     EISSN: 14765446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400242     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (13)

References (2)
  • 1
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The quorom statement
    • Moher D, Cook D, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999; 354:1896-1899.
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1899
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4    Rennie, D.5    Stroup, D.6
  • 2
    • 0034685429 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiologya proposal for reporting
    • Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, et al Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiologyA proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc 2000; 283:2008-2012.
    • (2000) J am Med Assoc , vol.283 , pp. 2008-2012
    • Stroup, D.1    Berlin, J.2    Morton, S.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.