Response to miser: The objects and objectives of operational research

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1323-1326

  Ormerod, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984739695     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.1996.168     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. H. Miser (1996) Comments prompted by ‘On the nature of OR—entering the fray’. This issue.
2. B. Latour (1987) Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. J. Bohman (1991) New Philosophy of Social Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. T. Brody (1993) The Philosophy behind Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5. A. Pickering (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time Agency and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
6. J. R. Ravetz (1971) Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reprinted in 1996 with a new introduction by the author, Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
7. J. R. Ravetz (1990) The Merger of Knowledge with Power Essays in Critical Science. Mansell, London.
8. J. Habermas (1971) Towards a Rational Society. Beacon, Boston.
9. J. C. Mingers (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. J. Applied Systems Analysis 7,41-49.
10. M. C. Jackson (1991) Systems Methodologies for the Management Sciences. Plenum, New York.
11. R. L. Flood (1990) Liberating Systems Theory. Plenum, New York.