Who makes U.S. trade policy?

International Trade Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 53-100

  Carter, Ralph G ^a   Eden, Lorraine ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984737652     PISSN: 08853908     EISSN: 15210545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/088539099272071     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Balassa, B.1965.Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage.The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies33(May): 99-123.
2. Baldwin, R. E.1985. The political economy of U.S. import policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Baldwin, R. E.1989. The political economy of trade policy.Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 119-35.
4. Barilleaux, R. J.1988. The president, ‘intermestic’ issues, and the risks of policy leadership. In The domestic sources of American foreign policy: Insights and evidence, eds. C. W. Kegley, Jr. and E. R. Wittkopf, pp. 178-88. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
5. Bhagwati, J.1988. Protectionism.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bendor, J.1995.A model of muddling through.American Political Science Review89: 819-40.
7. Bergsten, C. F.1990. The world economy after the cold war.Foreign Affairs69: 96-112.
8. Carter, R. G.In press.Congressional trade politics in the post-cold war era, Congress and the presidency.
9. Choate, P.1990. Agents of influence.New York: Knopf.
10. Cooper, R. N.1972-73.Trade policy is foreign policy. Foreign Policy9: 18-36.
11. Congressional Quarterly (CQ).1990. Congress and the nation, Vol. VII, 1985-1988. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
12. CQ.1993. Congress and the nation, Vol. VIII, 1989-1992. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
13. CQ.1994. Congressional quarterly almanac, 1993. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
14. CQ.1995a. Congressional quarterly almanac, 1994.Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
15. CQ.1995b. Congressional quarterly weekly report, 1995.Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
16. CQ.1996. Congressional quarterly weekly report, 1996. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
17. Czinkota, M. R.1986. U.S. trade policy and congress.Columbia Journal of World Business20:71-7.
18. Destler, I. M.1986. Protecting Congress or protecting trade?Foreign Policy62: 96-107.
19. Destler, I. M.1992. American trade politics, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics/Twentieth Century Fund.
20. Destler, I. M.1994a. Delegating trade policy. In The president, the Congress, and the making of foreign policy, ed. P. E. Peterson, pp. 228-45. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
21. Destler, I. M.1994b. Foreign policy making with the economy at center stage. In Beyond the beltway: engaging the public in U.S. foreign policy, eds. D. Yenkelovich and I. M. Destler, pp. 26-42. New York: W. W. Norton/The American Assembly.
22. Destler, I. M.1995. American trade politics, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics/Twentieth Century Fund.
23. Eden, L., and Molot, M. A.1992.Comparative and competitive advantage in the North American trade bloc.Canadian Business Economics 1(1) Fall: 45-59.
24. Finger, J. M., Hall, H. K., and Nelson, D. R.1982.The political economy of administered protection.American Economic Review72: 452-66.
25. Garten, J. E.1992. A cold peace: America, Japan, Germany, and the struggle for supremacy. New York: Random House.
26. Goldstein, J.1988. Ideas, institutions and American trade policy. In The state and American foreign economic policy, eds. G. J. Ikenberry, D. A. Lake, and M. Mastanduno, pp. 179-217. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27. Haggard, S.1988. The institutional foundations of hegemony: Explaining the reciprocal trade agreements act of 1934. In The state and American foreign economic policy, eds. G. J. Ikenberry, D. A. Lake, and M. Mastanduno, pp. 91-119. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
28. Hinckley, B.1994.Less than meets the eye: Foreign policy making and the myth of the assertive Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press/Twentieth Century Fund.
29. Jones, R. W., and Krueger, A. O.1990.The political economy of international trade: Essays in honor of Robert E. Baldwin. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
30. Kalt, J. P.1996. Precedent and legal argument in U.S. trade policy: Do they matter to the political economy of the lumber industry? In The political economy of American trade policy, ed. A. O. Krueger, pp. 261-90. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31. Krueger, A. O.1996. Conclusions. In The political economy of Ameri- can trade policy, ed. A. O. Krueger, pp. 423-43. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32. Lindblom, C. E.1959. The science of muddling through.Public Administration Review19:79-88.
33. Lindsay, J. M.1993. Congress and diplomacy. In Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill, eds. R. B. Ripley and J. M. Lindsay, pp. 261-81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34. Lindsay, J. M.1994. Congress, foreign policy, and the new institutionalism.International Studies Quarterly38:281-304.
35. Lindsay, J. M., and Ripley, R. B.1993.How Congress influences foreign and defense policy. In Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill, eds. R. B. Ripley and J. M. Lindsay, pp. 17-35. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36. Manning, B.1977. The Congress, the executive and intermestic affairs.Foreign Affairs55: 306-24.
37. Margolis, L.1986. Executive agreements and presidential power in foreign policy.New York: Praeger.
38. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., and Weingast, B. R.1987.Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Administration3: 721-48.
39. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., and Weingast, B. R.1989.Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review75: 431-82.
40. Moe, T. M.1984. The new economics of organization.American Journal of Po litical Science28: 739-77.
41. Morrow, J.1994.Game theory for political scientists.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42. Nivola, P. S.1990. Trade policy: Refereeing the playing field. In A question of balance: The president, the Congress, and foreign policy, ed. T. E. Mann, pp. 201-53.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
43. O’Halloran, S.1993. Congress and foreign trade policy. In Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill, eds. R. B. Ripley and J. M. Lindsay, pp. 283-303. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Pre ss.
44. Paarlberg, R. L.1995. Leadership begins at home: U.S. foreign economic policy after the cold war.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
45. Pastor, R. A.1980.Congress and the politics of U.S. foreign economic policy, 1929-1976.Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. Pastor, R. A.1983.Cry-and-sigh syndrome: Congress and trade policy. In Making economic policy in Congress, ed. A. Schick, pp. 158-95. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
47. Prestowitz, C. V., Jr. 1988. Trading places: How we allowed Japan to take the lead. New York: Basic Books.
48. Ripley, R. B., and Franklin, G. A.1991.Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy, 5th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49. Schattschneider, E. E.1935. Politics, pressures and the tariff.New York: Prentice-Hall.
50. Tierney, J. T.1993. Interest group involvement in congressional foreign and defense policy. In Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill, eds. R. B. Ripley and J. M. Lindsay, pp. 89-111. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
51. Vollrath, T.1985. Dynamics of comparative advantage and the resistance to free trade.Washington, D.C.: Department of Agriculture, International Economics Division.
52. Weingast, B. R.1984. The congressional bureaucratic system: A principal-agent perspective. Public Choice41: 147-91.