An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modeling

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn 23-25-August-1995, Issue , 1995, Pages 227-235

  Kaindl, Hermann ^a  

^a SIEMENS AG ÖSTERREICH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Design Support Tools And Environments; Formal Notations; Requirements Capture And Documentation; Scenario Based Design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SUPPORT TOOLS; FORMAL NOTATIONS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; INTERACTION DESIGN; REAL WORLD PROJECTS; REQUIREMENTS CAPTURE; SCENARIO-BASED DESIGN; TASK MODELING;

EID: 84984653800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/225434.225460     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. D. Allemang. Using functional models in automatic debugging. IEEE Expert, 6(6): 13-18, December 1991.
2. J. M. Carroll, R. L. Mack, S. P. Robertson, and M. B. Rosson. Binding objects to scenarios of use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1/2):243-276, July/August 1994.
3. J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson. Getting around the task-Artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, l0(2):181-212, April1992.
4. B. Chandrasekaran, A. K. Goel, andY. Iwasaki. Functional representation as design rationale. IEEE Computer, 26(1):48-56, 1993.
5. A. Dardenne, A. van Lamsweerde, and S. Fickas. Goaldirected requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20:3-50, 1993.
6. A. M. Davis. Software Requirements: Objects, Functions, and States. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
7. D. de Champeaux and P. Faure. A comparative study of object-oriented analysis methods. Journal of ObjectOriented Programming, pages 21-33, March/April 1992.
8. D. Hare!, H. Lachover, A. Naamad, A. Pnueli, M. Politi, R. Sherman, A. Shtuii-Trauring, and M. Trakhtenbrot. STATEMATE: A working environment for the development of complex reactive systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(4):403-414, 1990.
9. P. Hsia, J. Samuel, J. Gao, D. Kung, Y. Toyoshima, and C. Chen. Formal approach to scenario analysis. IEEE Software, 11(2):33-41, 1994.
10. I. Jacobson, M. Christerson, P. Jonsson, and G. Overgaard. Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 1992.
11. H. Kaindl. Object-oriented approaches in software engineering and artificial intelligence. Journal of ObjectOriented Programming, 6(8):38-45, January 1994.
12. H. Kaindl. An approach to hypertext-based requirements specification and its application. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on HumanComputer Interaction (INTERACT '95), Lillehammer, Norway, June 1995. IFIP.
13. J. Kim and F. J. Lerch. Towards a model of cognitive process in logical design: Comparing objectoriented and traditional functional decomposition software methodologies. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), pages 489-498, Monterey, CA, May 1992.
14. B. Kuipers. Commonsense reasoning about causality: Deriving behavior from structure. Artificial Intelligence, 24(l-3): I 69-203, 1984.
15. C. Potts, K. Takahashi, and A. I. Ant6n. Inquiry-based requirements analysis. IEEE Software, 11(2):21-32, 1994.
16. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, and T. Holland, S. Carey. Human-Computer Interaction. AddisonWesley, Wokingham, England, 1994.
17. G.-C. Roman. A taxonomy of current issues in requirements engineering. IEEE Computer, 18(4): 14-22, 1985.
18. K. S. Rubin and A. Goldberg. Object behavior analysis. Communications of the ACM, 35(9):48-62, 1992.
19. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorensen. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
20. J. 0. P. Soares. Underlying concepts in process specification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference On Requirements Engineering (ICRE'94), pages 48-52, Colorado Springs, CO, Aprill994.
21. R. Wirfs-Brock. Adding to your conceptual tool kit: what's important about responsibility-driven design? Report on Object Analysis and Design, l (2), 1994.
22. E. Yourdon. Modern Structured Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.