Advanced language proficiency

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 506-521

  Byrnes, Heidi ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984638946     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249—306.
2. Ädel, A. (2008). Metadiscourse across three varieties of English: American, British, and advanced-learner English. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout, and W. V. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 45—62). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (1999). Proficiency guidelines revised. Yonkers, NY: Author.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. (Eds.). (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., and Ellis, N. C. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 1—26.
6. Belcher, D. and Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Belcher, D. and Hirvela, A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
8. Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
10. Bhatia, V. K. (2002).Agenericview of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21—39). Harlow, England: Longman.
11. Bhatia, V. K. and Gotti M. (Eds.). (2006). Explorations in specialized genres. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
12. Bialystok, E. (2002). On the reliability of robustness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 481-488.
13. Biber, D. (1992). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15(2), 133-163.
14. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., and Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 9-48.
16. Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (Eds.). (1994). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,43, 319-328.
18. Bohnacker, U. and Rosén, C. (2008). The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives: Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 511-538.
19. Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation. The case of very advanced L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Byrnes, H. (Guest Ed.). (2009a). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: Systemic-functional reflections. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 1-79.
21. Byrnes, H. (2009b). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50-66.
22. Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H. H., and Sprang, K. A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85-110.
23. Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., and Norris, J. M. (2010). Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 42, S-1.
24. Carroll, J. B. (1968). The psychology of language testing. In A. Davies (Ed.), Language testing symposium: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 46-69). London: Oxford University Press.
25. Carroll, M. and Lambert, M. (2006). Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s: French and German learners of English. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, and K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 54—73). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
26. Carroll, M., Murcia-Serra, J., Watorek, M., and Bendiscioli, A. (2000). The relevance of information organization to second language acquisition studies: The descriptive discourse of advanced adult learners of German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(3), 441—466.
27. Choi, S. and Lantolf, J. P. (2008). Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication: Motion events in the speech and gesture of advanced L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 191—224.
28. Christie, F. and Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
29. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
30. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., and Rozycki, W. V. (Eds.). (2008). Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Cook, V. (2008). Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for second language acquisition research? In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 16—26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
33. Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63(3), 544-573.
34. Crane, C. (2006). Modelling a genre-based foreign language curriculum: Staging advanced L2 learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 227-245). London: Continuum.
35. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
36. Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474-509.
38. Ferris, D. and Tagg, T. (1996). Academic oral communication needs of EAP learners: What subject-matter instructors really require. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 31-58.
39. Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C.J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, and W. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85-101). New York: Academic Press.
40. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Academic discourse. Harlow, England: Longman.
41. Flowerdew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticism against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 321-332.
42. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323.
43. Francis, N. (2006). The development of secondary discourse ability and metalinguistic awareness in second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 37-60.
44. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (pp. 323-351). London: Continuum.
45. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (Third Edition). London: Edward Arnold.
46. Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J. (Eds.). (2009). Continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London/New York: Continuum.
47. Harklau, L. (2008). Developing qualitative longitudinal case studies of advanced language learners. In L. Ortega and H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 23-35). New York: Routledge.
48. Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J.J. (Eds.). (2005/2008). Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (Vol. 1 and 2). London: Equinox.
49. Herdina, P. and Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
50. Housen, A. and Kuiken, F. (Guest eds.) (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-606.
51. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
52. Hyland, K. (Ed.). (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
53. Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
54. Hyland, K. and Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2006). Academic discourse across disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
55. Hyon, S. (2001). Long-term effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (Supplement 1), 417-438.
56. Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
57. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, Supplementto Volume 92, Monograph, 2008.
60. Kinginger, C. and Belz, J. A. (2005). Socio-cultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic case studies from telecollaboration and residence abroad. International Pragmatics, 2-4, 369-421.
61. Koponen, M. and Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5-24). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
62. Kubota, R. and Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 7-27.
63. Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579-589.
65. Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200-213.
66. Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487-535). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
67. Malone, M. E., Rifkin, B., Christian, D., and Johnson, D. E. (2003). Attaining high levels of proficiency: Challenges for language education in the United States. Paper presented at the Conference on Global Challenges and U.S. Higher Education at Duke University, January 23-25, 2003. http://www.duke. edu/web/cis/globalchallenges/pdf/malone-rifkin.pdf.
68. Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21.
69. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
70. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
71. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2006). Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Exploring the meaning-making resources of languages systemic-functionally. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 31-57). London: Continuum.
72. Moon, R. (Ed.). (2009). Words, grammar, text: Revisiting the work of John Sinclair. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73. Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical inquiry. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
74. Norris, J. M. (2006). Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, and K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 167-187). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
75. Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2009). An organic approach to investigating complexity, accuracy, and fluency in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578.
76. Ortega, L. (2010). The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary delivered at the 2010 conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, March 8, 2010. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~lortega/.
77. Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H. (Eds.). (2008a). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. New York/London: Routledge.
78. Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H. (2008b). Theorizing advancedness. Setting up the longitudinal research agenda. In L. Ortega and H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 281-299). New York/London: Routledge.
79. Pawley, A. and Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman.
80. Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol I. Field methods. Vol. II: The results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(2), 179-206.
82. Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design: What do we need to know? In T. Silva and P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83. Rinner, S. and Weigert, A. (2006). From sports to the EU economy: Integrating curricula through genre-based content courses. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, and K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 136-151). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
84. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
85. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86-123). London: Longman.
86. Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2008). Creating textual worlds in advanced learner writing: The role of complex theme. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 164-183). London: Continuum.
87. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119-140). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
88. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89. Schleppegrell, M.J. (2006). The linguistic features of advanced language use: The grammar of exposition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 134-146). London: Continuum.
90. Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 357-385.
91. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
92. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
93. Shohamy, E. (2006). Rethinking assessment of advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, and K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 188-208). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
94. Silva, T. and Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.). (2001). Landmark essays on ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Hermagoras Press.
95. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
96. Slobin, D. I. (1996a). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. Slobin, D. I. (1996b). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195-219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
98. Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3-62.
99. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
102. Tardy, C. M. and Swales, J. M. (2008). Form, text organization, genre, coherence, and cohesion. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 565-581). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
103. Teruya, K. (2006). Grammar as a resource for the construction of language logic for advanced language learning in Japanese. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 109-133). London: Continuum.
104. Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. (2006). System and corpus: Exploring connections. London: Equinox.
105. Ventola, E. and Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (1996). Academic writing. Intercultural and textual issues. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
106. Verspoor, M. and Lowie, W. (2008). Variability in L2 development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214-231.
107. von Stutterheim, C. and Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, and K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 40-53). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
108. von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M., and Klein, W. (2003). Two ways of construing complex temporal structures. In F. Lenz (Ed.), Deictic conceptualisation of space, time, and person (pp. 97-133). Berlin: de Gruyter.
109. von Stutterheim, C. and Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics: Special Issue: Perspectives in Language Production, 41(5), 851-881.
110. Wertsch, J. V. (2006). Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 58-71). London: Continuum.
111. Zamel, V. and Spack, R. (Eds.) (1998). Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.