First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in current clinical practice: Updated evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comprising 31 379 patients

Open Heart

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Navarese, Eliano Pio ^a,b,m   Kowalewski, Mariusz ^c,m   Kandzari, David ^d,m   Lansky, Alexandra ^e   Górny, Bartosz ^c,m   Kołtowski, Łukasz ^f,m   Waksman, Ron ^g   Berti, Sergio ^a,m   Musumeci, Giuseppe ^h,m   Limbruno, Ugo ⁱ   Van Der Schaaf, Rene J ^j   Kelm, Malte ^b,m   Kubica, Jacek ^k,m   Suryapranata, Harry ^l  

^a INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Italy)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic   (Poland)

^d PIEDMONT HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^g WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^h OSPEDALI RIUNITI   (Italy)

ⁱ MISERICORDIA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^j ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^k NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^l RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^m Systematic Investigation and Research on Interventions and Outcomes MEDICINE Research Network   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; EVEROLIMUS; PACLITAXEL; PURINERGIC P2Y12 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; PURINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; RAPAMYCIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZOTAROLIMUS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEVICE APPROVAL; DEVICE SAFETY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; DRUG SAFETY; EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEART DEATH; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACLITAXEL ELUTING CORONARY STENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SIROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT; STENT THROMBOSIS; TARGET LESION REVASCULARIZATION; TARGET VESSEL REVASCULARIZATION; TREATMENT DURATION; ZOTAROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT;

EID: 84984633439     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20533624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000064     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Greenhalgh J, Hockenhull J, Rao N, et al. Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for angina or acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(5):CD004587.
2. Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation 2007;115:1440-55; discussion 1455.
3. Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet 2007;369:667-78.
4. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:193-202.
5. Navarese EP, Tandjung K, Claessen B, et al. Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f6530.
6. Sethi A, Bahekar A, Bhuriya R, et al. Zotarolimus-eluting stent versus sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2012;105:544-56.
7. Fan J, Du H, Yin Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:2126-33.
8. Park KW, Kang SH, Velders MA, et al. Safety and efficacy of everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials. Am Heart J 2013;165:241-50 e4.
9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:W65-94.
10. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-51.
11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
12. Fleiss JL. Analysis of data from multiclinic trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:267-75.
13. Velders MA, Boven AJV, Hofma SH. Xience V stent vs. Cypher stent in all-comer patients: a randomized trial. Unpublished Work, 2012.
14. Velders MA, Hofma SH, Brouwer J, et al. Two-year results of an open-label randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e64424.
15. Kaiser C, Galatius S, Erne P, et al. Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2310-19.
16. Park HJ, Kim HY, Lee JM, et al. Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents vs. sirolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusion - CAtholic Total Occlusion Study (CATOS) trial. Circ J 2012;76:868-75.
17. Moreno R, Garcia E, Teles R, et al. Randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of total coronary occlusions: results from the chronic coronary occlusion treated by everolimus-eluting stent randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:21-8.
18. Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2010;375:201-9.
19. Smits PC, Kedhi E, Royaards KJ, et al. 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice. COMPARE (Comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V stent with the paclitaxel eluting TAXUS LIBERTE stent in all-comers: a randomized open label trial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:11-18.
20. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/714902 (accessed Jan 2014).
21. Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2440-7.
22. Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Popma JJ, et al. Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:543-50.
23. Leon MB, Mauri L, Popma JJ, et al. A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:543-54.
24. Kirtane AJ, Leon MB, Ball MW, et al. The "final" 5-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:325-33.
25. Kim WJ, Lee SW, Park SW, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stent versus sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (ESSENCE-DIABETES): results from the ESSENCE-DIABETES trial. Circulation 2011;124:886-92.
26. Park KW, Chae IH, Lim DS, et al. Everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the EXCELLENT (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1844-54.
27. Ribichini F, Romano M, Rosiello R, et al. A Clinical and Angiographic Study of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: The EXECUTIVE Trial (EXecutive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE V in a Multi Vessel Disease). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:1012-22.
28. Byrne RA, Mehilli J, Iijima R, et al. A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents. Eur Heart J 2009;30:923-31.
29. Byrne RA, Kastrati A, Tiroch K, et al. 2-year clinical and angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial of polymer-free dual drug-eluting stents versus polymer-based Cypher and Endeavor [corrected] drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2536-43.
30. Kang WC, Ahn T, Lee K, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Korean Multicentre Endeavor (KOMER) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) trial. EuroIntervention 2011;7:936-43.
31. Park DW, Kim YH, Song HG, et al. Comparison of everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with long coronary artery lesions: a randomized LONG-DES-III (Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III) Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1096-103.
32. Ahn JM, Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Comparison of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with de novo long coronary artery lesions: a randomized LONG-DES IV trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:633-40.
33. Briguori C, Airoldi F, Visconti G, et al. Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events in diabetic patients (Naples-diabetes) trial: a randomized comparison of 3 drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:121-9.
34. Van den Branden BJ, Teeuwen K, Koolen JJ, et al. Primary Stenting of Totally Occluded Native Coronary Arteries III (PRISON III): a randomised comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions. EuroIntervention 2013;9:841-53.
35. Xu B, Yang Y, Yuan Z, et al. Zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in an all-comer population in China: the RESOLUTE China randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:664-70.
36. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, et al. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET). Circulation 2012;126:1225-36.
37. Sakakibara T, Ishii H, Toriyama T, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent vs. everolimus-eluting stent for coronary intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Circ J 2012;76:351-5.
38. Sawada T, Shinke T, Otake H, et al. Comparisons of detailed arterial healing response at seven months following implantation of an everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:960-6.
39. Burzotta F, Trani C, Todaro D, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions by provisional approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:327-35.
40. Chung WY, Kang J, Cho YS, et al. A randomized, prospective, two-center comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent and zotarolimus-eluting stent in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the SEZE trial. Chin Med J 2012;125:3373-81.
41. Song HG, Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Randomized trial of optimal treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1093-100.
42. Rasmussen K, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, et al. Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care (SORT OUT III): a randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2010;375:1090-9.
43. Maeng M, Tilsted HH, Jensen LO, et al. 3-Year clinical outcomes in the randomized SORT OUT III superiority trial comparing zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:812-18.
44. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Hansen HS, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome IV (SORT OUT IV). Circulation 2012;125:1246-55.
45. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Christiansen EH, et al. 2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes: the SORT OUT IV (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IV) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1140-7.
46. Serruys PW, Ruygrok P, Neuzner J, et al. A randomised comparison of an everolimus-eluting coronary stent with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent:the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention 2006;2:286-94.
47. Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Serruys PW, et al. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention 2013;8:1047-51.
48. Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA 2008;299:1903-13.
49. Applegate RJ, Yaqub M, Hermiller JB, et al. Long-term (three-year) safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents (from the SPIRIT III Trial). Am J Cardiol 2011;107:833-40.
50. Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W, et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1663-74.
51. Stone GW, Rizvi A, Sudhir K, et al. Randomized comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. 2-year follow-up from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:19-25.
52. Grube E, Chevalier B, Guagliumi G, et al. The SPIRIT V diabetic study: a randomized clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent vs the TAXUS Liberte paclitaxel-eluting stent in diabetic patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Am Heart J 2012;163:867-75 e1.
53. Wang L, Zhang D, Yang X, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of Cypher® stent and Endeavor® stent in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:B216 (Abstract).
54. Hofma SH, Brouwer J, Velders MA, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. 1-year results of the randomized XAMI (XienceV Stent vs. Cypher Stent in Primary PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:381-7.
55. Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stents with sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization: the ZEST (comparison of the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stent with sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary lesions) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1187-95.
56. Lee CW, Park DW, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-, sirolimus-, and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1370-6.
57. http://www.trialresultscenter.org/study8670-ZEST-AMI-(vs-SES).htm; http://www.trialresultscenter.org/study8670-ZEST-AMI-(vs-PES).htm (accessed Jan 2014).
58. Radeleff B, Lopez-Benitez R, Stampfl U, et al. Paclitaxel-induced arterial wall toxicity and inflammation: tissue uptake in various dose densities in a minipig model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:1262-70.
59. Stampfl U, Radeleff B, Sommer C, et al. Paclitaxel-induced arterial wall toxicity and inflammation: part 2 - long-term tissue response in a minipig model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:1608-16.
60. Applegate R, Hermiller J, Williams J, et al. Evaluation of the effects of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents on target lesions with jailed side branches: 2-year results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;76:644-51.
61. Joner M, Nakazawa G, Finn AV, et al. Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:333-42.
62. Nakatani S, Nishino M, Taniike M, et al. Initial findings of impact of strut width on stent coverage and apposition of sirolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;81:776-81.
63. Hausleiter J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, et al. Impact of lesion complexity on the capacity of a trial to detect differences in stent performance: results from the ISAR-STEREO trial. Am Heart J 2003;146:882-6.
64. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, John MC, et al. The significance of preclinical evaluation of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:36M-44M.
65. Silber S, Windecker S, Vranckx P, et al. Unrestricted randomised use of two new generation drug-eluting coronary stents: 2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial. Lancet 2011;377:1241-7.