Efficiency implications of silvicultural expenditures from separating ownership and management on forest lands

Forest Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 365-378

  Luckert, Martin K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Forest tenure; Incentives; Market failures; Monte Carlo simulations; Sharecropping

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROPS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EFFICIENCY; LAND USE; MARKETING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PUBLIC POLICY;

FOREST TENURE; INCENTIVES; SHARECROPPING; TIMBER CROPS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84984533391     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ALCHIAN, A., AND H. DEMSETZ. 1973. The property rights paradigm. J. Econ. Hist. 33(1):16-27.
2. ALLEN, D., AND D. LUECK. 1992. Contract choice in modern agriculture: Cash rent versus cropshare. J. Law Econ. 24:397-426.
3. ALLEN, D., AND D. LUECK. 1993. Transaction costs and the design of cropshare contracts. RAND J. Econ. 24(1):78-100.
4. ANDERSON, T.L., AND D. LUECK. 1992. Land productivity and agricultural productivity on Indian reservations. J. Law Econ. 24:427-454.
5. BOYD, R.G., AND W.F. HYDE. 1989. Forest sector intervention: The impacts of regulation on social welfare. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 295 p.
6. CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY AND CANADIAN PULP AND PAPER ASSOCIATION. 1991. The provision of secure funding of silviculture through an evergreen tenure system based on forest land rent. For. Chron. 67(4):349-352.
7. CHEUNG, S.N. 1969. Theory of share tenancy. University of Chicago Press. 188 p.
8. CHEUNG, S.N. 1970. The structure of a contract and the theory of a non-exclusive resource. J. Law Econ. 13(1):49-70.
9. DEACON, R.T. 1994. Deforestation and the rule of law in a cross-section of countries. Land Econ. 70(4):414-30.
10. ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF CANADA. 1984. Western-transition. Minister of Supply and Services, Canada. 260 p.
11. FEDER, G., AND T. ONCHAN. 1987. Land ownership security and farm investment in Thailand. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 69:311-320.
12. FEDER, G., T. ONCHAN, AND Y. CHALAMWONG. 1988. Land policies and farm performance in Thailand's forest reserve areas. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 36(3):483-501.
13. FORESTRY CANADA. 1991. The state of forestry in Canada: 1990. Rep. to Parliament. Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa.
14. GRAINGER, M.B. 1969. Leasing of forest land on a royalty basis. N.Z.J. For. 14(1):5-19.
15. HALEY D., AND M.K. LUCKERT. 1990. Forest tenures in Canada: A framework for policy analysis. Econ. Branch, Inf. Rep. E-X-43, Forestry Canada, Ottawa.
16. HALEY, D., AND M.K. LUCKERT. 1998. Tenures as economic instruments of achieving objectives of public forest policy in British Columbia. In The wealth of forests: Markets, regulation, and sustainable development, C. Tollefson (ed.). UBC Press, Vancouver, B.C. (In press).
17. HANLEY, N. 1992. Are their environmental limits to benefit cost analysis? Environ. Resour. Econ. 2:33-60.
18. LUCKERT, M.K. 1991. The perceived security of institutional environments of some British Columbia forest tenures. Can. J. For. Res. 21:318-325.
19. LUCKERT, M.K., AND D. HALEY. 1995. The allowable cut effect as a policy instrument in Canadian forestry. Can. J. For. Res. 25:1821-1829.
20. LUCKERT, M.K., AND D. HALEY. 1990. The implications of various silvicultural funding arrangements for privately managed public forest land in Canada. New For. 4:1-12.
21. LUCKERT, M.K., AND D. HALEY. 1989. Funding mechanisms for silviculture on crown land: Status, problems and recommendations for British Columbia. For. Econ. and Policy Anal. Res. Unit. Work. Pap. #131-A. Univ. of British Columbia. Vols. 1 (59 p.) and 2 (51 p.).
22. LUCKERT, M.K., AND W. ADAMOWICZ. 1993. Empirical measures of factors affecting social rates of discount. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3(1):1-22.
23. MARKANDYA, A., AND D.W. PEARCE. 1991. Development, the environment, and the social rate of discount. World Bank Res. Observ. 6(2):137-52.
24. NAUTIYAL, J.C., AND J.K. RAWAT. 1986. Role of forest tenure in the investment behaviour of integrated Canadian forestry firms. Can. J. For. Res. 16:456-63.
25. PEARSE, P.H. 1976. Timber rights and forest policy in British Columbia. Rep. of the Roy. Comm. of For. Resour., Victoria, BC. Vols. 1 and 2.
26. PEJOVICH, S. 1984. Origins and consequences of alternative property rights. P. 163-175 in Selling the federal forests, Gamache, A.E. (ed.). The University of Washington, Coll. of For. Resour., Seattle, WA.
27. PLACE, F. 1995. The role of land and tree tenure on the adoption of agroforestry technologies in Zambia, Burundi, Uganda, and Malawi: A summary and synthesis. Land Tenure Center, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison. 105 p.
28. PLACE, F., AND P. HAZELL. 1993. Productivity effects of indigenous land tenure systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Am. J. of Agric. Econ. 75:10-19.
29. RANDALL, A. 1987. Resour. Econ.: An economic approach to natural resource and environmental policy. Ed. 2. Wiley, Toronto. 434 p.
30. REPETTO, R., AND M. GILLIS. 1988. Public policies and the misuse of forest resources. Cambridge University Press, New York.
31. WOLF, C., JR. 1988. Markets or governments: Choosing between imperfect alternatives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 219 p.
32. ZHANG. D. 1996. Forest tenures and land value in British Columbia. J. For. Econ. 2(1):7-30.
33. ZHANG, D., AND P.H. PEARSE. 1994a. The effect of forest tenure on silvicultural investments in British Columbia. Work. Pap. #205, For. Econ. and Policy Res. Unit, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
34. ZHANG, D., AND P.H. PEARSE. 1994b. The influence of the form of tenure on the forest practices in British Columbia. Work. Pap. #206, For. Econ. and Policy Res. Unit, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.