PROTESTANT FUNDAMENTALISM AND THE RETRIBUTIVE DOCTRINE OF PUNISHMENT

Criminology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 21-46

  GRASMICK, HAROLD G ^a   DAVENPORT, ELIZABETH ^a   CHAMLIN, MITCHELL B ^a   BURSIK, ROBERT J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984283913     PISSN: 00111384     EISSN: 17459125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01092.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Operationalizing evangelicalism: An amendment
2. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta‐analysis
3. Assessing the presence of harmful collinearity and other forms of weak data through a test for signal‐to‐noise
4. Sentencing of convicted offenders: An analysis of the public's views
5. Ladies in pink: Religion and political ideology in the anti‐ERA movement
6. Challenging just deserts: Punishing white‐collar criminals
7. Identifying conservative Protestantism
8. Justice, sanctioning, and the justice model
9. Beyond hellfire: An exploration of the variable effects of religiosity on adolescent marijuana and alcohol use
10. Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning
11. Religiosity and delinquency: A contextual analysis
12. Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists
13. The seriousness of crime cross‐culturally
14. Public support for the death penalty: Retribution as just deserts or retribution as revenge
15. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics—1987
16. Family experience and public support of the death penalty
17. The death penalty, retribution and penal policy
18. Attributions of responsibility to God: An interaction of religious beliefs and outcomes
19. Denomination, religiosity and compliance with the law: A study of adults
20. Punishment
21. Toward desacralizing secularization theory
22. Social consensus on norms of justice: Should the punishment fit the crime
23. Over‐simplification and error in public opinion surveys on capital punishment
24. Causal attribution and punishment for crime
25. Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for pro‐family issues in the United States
26. Public opinion regarding crime, criminal justice, and related topics
27. Social psychology and religious fundamentalism
28. Biblical literalism and inerrancy: Does the difference make a difference
29. The religious factor and delinquency: Another look at the hellfire hypothesis
30. Are you now or have you ever been a sociologist?
31. From “nothing works” to “the appropriate works”: The latest stop on the search for the secular grail
32. An exploration of adults' religious orientations and their philosophies of human nature
33. An exploration of the attributional styles of Christian fundamentalists and of authoritarians
34. Resource mobilization and social movements
35. Mirror images? Conceptions of God and political duty on the left and right of the evangelical spectrum
36. Social background and the sentencing behavior of judges
37. Symbolic policy and the sentencing of drug offenders
38. Structuring sentencing discretion: The new federal sentencing guidelines
39. Fire and brimstone, lager and pot: Religious involvement and substance use
40. Sex prejudice among white Protestants: Like or unlike ethnic prejudice
41. Understanding penal reform: The dynamic of change
42. Changing attitudes toward capital punishment
43. Review of the polls: Images of God among Americans
44. Classifying Protestant denominations
45. A general attribution theory for the psychology of religion
46. A sociological perspective on support for capital punishment
47. Public opinion on criminal law and legal sanctions: An examination of two conceptual models
48. Religiosity and deviance: Toward a contingency theory of constraining effects
49. Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime or symbolic attitude
50. Public opinion and the death penalty
51. Churches as political communities
52. Political cohesion in churches
53. What is the perceived seriousness of crimes
54. America's perceptions of crime and punishment
55. Public goals of punishment and support for the death penalty
56. Norms, theories of punishment, and publicly preferred penalties for crimes
57. Evangelicals and fundamentalists in the New Christian Right: Religious differences in the Ohio moral majority
58. Religion and role‐identity: A structural symbolic interactionist conceptualization of religiosity
59. The National Survey of Crime Severity
60. The moral basis of moral reform: Status discontent vs. culture and socialization as explanations of anti‐pornography social movement adherence