Drought-induced shoot dieback starts with massive root xylem embolism and variable depletion of nonstructural carbohydrates in seedlings of two tree species

New Phytologist

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 597-610

  Rodríguez Calcerrada, Jesús ^a   Li, Meng ^a   López, Rosana ^a,b   Cano, Francisco Javier ^a,b   Oleksyn, Jacek ^c   Atkin, Owen K ^d   Pita, Pilar ^a   Aranda, Ismael ^e   Gil, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c INSTITUTE OF DENDROLOGY   (Poland)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

carbon starvation; cavitation; die off; forest decline; phloem failure; plant mortality; stem growth

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; CAVITATION; DICOTYLEDON; DIEBACK; DROUGHT; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; EVERGREEN TREE; FOREST DYNAMICS; GAS EXCHANGE; GROWTH RATE; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PHLOEM; POPULATION DECLINE; RESPROUTING; ROOT SYSTEM; STARVATION; STEM; WATER STRESS; XYLEM;

EMBRYOPHYTA; ILEX; QUERCUS ILEX; ULMUS MINOR;

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; WATER;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CELL RESPIRATION; CHEMISTRY; DROUGHT; ELM; GAS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; OAK; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STEM; PLANT STOMA; SEEDLING; SHOOT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE; WATER VAPOR; XYLEM;

CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON; CELL RESPIRATION; DROUGHTS; GASES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STEMS; PLANT STOMATA; QUERCUS; SEEDLINGS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STEAM; TREES; ULMUS; WATER; XYLEM;

EID: 84983795587     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14150     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams HD, Germino MJ, Breshears DD, Barron-Gafford GA, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Zou CB, Huxman TE. 2013. Nonstructural leaf carbohydrate dynamics of Pinus edulis during drought-induced tree mortality reveal role for carbon metabolism in mortality mechanism. New Phytologist 197: 1142–1151.
2. Aguadé D, Poyatos R, Gómez M, Oliva J, Martínez-Vilalta J. 2015. The role of defoliation and root rot pathogen infection in driving the mode of drought-related physiological decline in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Physiology 35: 229–242.
3. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH et al. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 660–684.
4. Anderegg WRL, Anderegg LDL. 2013. Hydraulic and carbohydrate changes in experimental drought-induced mortality of saplings in two conifer species. Tree Physiology 33: 252–260.
5. Anderegg WRL, Berry JA, Smith DD, Sperry JS, Anderegg LDL, Field CB. 2012. The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 233–237.
6. Atkin OK, Bloomfield KJ, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Asner GP, Bonal D, Bönisch G, Bradford MG, Cernusak LA, Cosio EG et al. 2015. Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits. New Phytologist 206: 614–636.
7. Atkin OK, Macherel D. 2009. The crucial role of plant mitochondria in orchestrating drought tolerance. Annals of Botany 103: 581–597.
8. Augé RM, Duan X, Croker JL, Witte WT, Green CD. 1998. Foliar dehydration tolerance of twelve deciduous tree species. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 753–759.
9. 2 and growth temperature. New Phytologist 190: 1003–1018.
10. Barigah TS, Charrier O, Douris M, Bonhomme M, Herbette S, Améglio T, Fichot R, Brignolas F, Cochard H. 2013. Water-stress induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar. Annals of Botany 112: 1431–1437.
11. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. 2012. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecological Letters 15: 393–405.
12. 2, soil temperature and soil water content. Plant and Soil 195: 221–232.
13. Cai J, Tyree MT. 2010. The impact of vessel size on vulnerability curves: data and models for within-species variability in saplings of aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 1059–1069.
14. Davis SD, Ewers FW, Sperry JS, Portwood KA, Crocker C, Adams GC. 2002. Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: a possible case of hydraulic failure. American Journal of Botany 89: 820–828.
15. Dickman LT, McDowell NG, Sevanto S, Pangle RE, Pockman WT. 2014. Carbohydrate dynamics and mortality in a piñon–juniper woodland under three future precipitation scenarios. Plant, Cell & Environment 38: 729–739.
16. Dietze MC, Sala A, Carbone MS, Czimczik CI, Mantooth JA, Richardson AD, Vargas R. 2014. Nonstructural carbon in woody plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 65: 667–687.
17. 2] and elevated temperature. Tree Physiology 33: 779–792.
18. Duursma R. 2016. Fit vulnerability curves in R (R package). [WWW document] URL https://bitbucket.org/remkoduursma/fitplc/ [accessed 30 June 2016].
19. Edgell SE, Noon SM. 1984. Effect of violation of normality on the t test of the correlation coefficient. Psychological Bulletin 95: 576–583.
20. Galiano L, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F. 2011. Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode. New Phytologist 190: 750–759.
21. Galvez DA, Landhäusser SM, Tyree MT. 2011. Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiology 31: 250–257.
22. Galvez DA, Landhäusser SM, Tyree MT. 2013. Low root reserve accumulation during drought may lead to winter mortality in poplar seedlings. New Phytologist 198: 139–148.
23. García-Forner N, Adams HD, Sevanto S, Collins AD, Dickman LT, Hudson PJ, Zeppel MJB, Jenkins MW, Powers H, Martínez-Vilalta J et al. 2016. Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation. Plant, Cell & Environment 39: 38–49.
24. Gruber A, Pirkebner D, Florian C, Oberhuber W. 2012. No evidence for depletion of carbohydrate pools in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) under drought stress. Plant Biology 14: 142–148.
25. Haissig BE, Dickson RE. 1979. Starch measurement in plant tissue using enzymatic hydrolysis. Physiologia Plantarum 47: 151–157.
26. Hansen J, Møller I. 1975. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Analytical Biochemistry 68: 87–94.
27. Hartmann H, Trumbore S. 2016. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees – from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytologist 211: 386–403.
28. Hartmann H, Ziegler W, Trumbore S. 2013. Lethal drought leads to reduction in nonstructural carbohydrates in Norway spruce tree roots but not in the canopy. Functional Ecology 27: 413–427.
29. Hsiao TC, Acevedo E, Fereres E, Henderson DW. 1976. Stress metabolism – water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 479–500.
30. Klein T, Hoch G, Yakir D, Körner C. 2014. Drought stress, growth and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of pine trees in a semi-arid forest. Tree Physiology 34: 981–992.
31. Körner C. 2003. Carbon limitation in trees. Journal of Ecology 91: 4–17.
32. Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ. 2012. Defoliation increases risk of carbon starvation in root systems of mature aspen. Trees 26: 653–666.
33. López R, López de Heredia U, Collada C, Cano FJ, Emerson BC, Cochard H, Gil L. 2013. Vulnerability to cavitation, hydraulic efficiency, growth and survival in an insular pine (Pinus canariensis). Annals of Botany 111: 1167–1179.
34. 2 springs. Environmental and Experimental Botany 54: 90–99.
35. Maherali H, Moura CF, Caldeira MC, Willson CJ, Jackson RB. 2006. Functional coordination between leaf gas exchange and vulnerability to xylem cavitation in temperate forest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 571–583.
36. Martin-StPaul NK, Longepierre D, Huc R, Delzon S, Burlett R, Joffre R, Rambal S, Cochard H. 2014. How reliable are methods to assess xylem vulnerability to cavitation? The issue of “open vessel” artifact in oaks. Tree Physiology 34: 894–905.
37. McDowell NG. 2011a. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiology 155: 1051–1059.
38. McDowell NG, Beerling DJ, Breshears DD, Fisher RA, Raffa KF, Stitt M. 2011b. The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 523–532.
39. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG et al. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist 178: 719–739.
40. Mencuccini M, Minunno F, Salmon Y, Martínez-Vilalta J, Hölttä T. 2015. Coordination of physiological traits involved in drought-induced mortality of woody plants. New Phytologist 208: 396–409.
41. Mitchell PJ, O'Grady AP, Tissue DT, White DA, Ottenschlaeger ML, Pinkard EA. 2013. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. New Phytologist 197: 862–872.
42. Nardini A, Battistuzzo M, Savi T. 2013. Shoot desiccation and hydraulic failure in temperate woody angiosperms during an extreme summer drought. New Phytologist 200: 322–329.
43. Ogle K, Barber JJ, Willson C, Thompson B. 2009. Hierarchical statistical modelling of xylem vulnerability to cavitation. New Phytologist 182: 541–554.
44. Oleksyn J, Zytkowiak R, Karolewski P, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG. 2000. Genetic and environmental control of seasonal carbohydrate dynamics in trees of diverse Pinus sylvestris populations. Tree Physiology 20: 837–847.
45. Oliva-Carrasco L, Bucci SJ, Francescantonio DD, Lezcano OA, Campanello PI, Scholz FG, Rodríguez S, Madanes N, Cristiano PM, Hao G-Y et al. 2015. Water storage dynamics in the main stem of subtropical tree species differing in wood density, growth rate and life history traits. Tree Physiology 35: 354–365.
46. Pineda-García F, Paz H, Meinzer FC. 2013. Drought resistance in early and late secondary successional species from a tropical dry forest: the interplay between xylem resistance to embolism, sapwood water storage and leaf shedding. Plant, Cell & Environment 36: 405–418.
47. Plaut JA, Yepez EA, Hill J, Pangle R, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, McDowell NG. 2012. Hydraulic limits preceding mortality in a piñon-juniper woodland under experimental drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 35: 1601–1617.
48. Pockman WT, Sperry JS. 2000. Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran desert vegetation. American Journal of Botany 87: 1287–1299.
49. Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA. 2012. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology 39: 839–850.
50. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Ramirez AR, Helms AM, Traugh CA, Tobin MF, Heffner MS, Davis SD. 2014. Mortality of resprouting chaparral shrubs after a fire and during a record drought; physiological mechanisms and demographic consequences. Global Change Biology 20: 893–907.
51. Quentin AG, Pinkard EA, Ryan MG, Tissue DT, Baggett LS, Adams HD, Maillard P, Marchand J, Landhäusser SM, Lacointe A et al. 2015. Non-structural carbohydrates in woody plants compared among laboratories. Tree Physiology 35: 1146–1165.
52. R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, v.2.15.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [WWW document] URL http://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 4 July 2016].
53. Ratkowsky DA. 1990. Handbook of nonlinear regression models. New York, NY, USA & Basel, Switzerland: Marcel Dekker.
54. Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Limousin J-M, Martin-StPaul NK, Jaeger C, Rambal S. 2012. Gas exchange and leaf aging in an evergreen oak: causes and consequences for leaf carbon balance and canopy respiration. Tree Physiology 32: 464–477.
55. 2 efflux decrease with drought in a Mediterranean forest stand. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 195–196: 61–72.
56. Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Shahin O, del Rey MC, Rambal S. 2011. Opposite changes in leaf dark respiration and soluble sugars with drought in two Mediterranean oaks. Functional Plant Biology 38: 1004–1015.
57. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G. 2010. Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytologist 186: 274–281.
58. Sala A, Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC. 2012. Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? Tree Physiology 32: 764–775.
59. Sevanto S, McDowell NG, Dickman LT, Pangle R, Pockman WT. 2014. How do trees die? A test of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Plant, Cell & Environment 37: 153–161.
60. Skelton RP, West AG, Dawson TE. 2015. Predicting plant vulnerability to drought in biodiverse regions using functional traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 18: 5744–5749.
61. Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1993. Integration of hydraulic and chemical signaling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 341–349.
62. 2 in tree stems. New Phytologist 177: 17–32.
63. Turner NC, Jones MM. 1980. Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ, eds. Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. New York, NY, USA: Wiley Interscience, 87–103.
64. Urli M, Porté AJ, Cochard H, Guengant Y, Burlett R, Delzon S. 2013. Xylem embolism threshold for catastrophic hydraulic failure in angiosperm trees. Tree Physiology 33: 672–683.
65. Venturas M, López R, Gascó A, Gil L. 2013. Hydraulic properties of European elms: xylem safety-efficiency tradeoff and species distribution in the Iberian Peninsula. Trees 27: 1691–1701.
66. Vilagrosa A, Bellot J, Vallejo VR, Gil-Pelegrín E. 2003. Cavitation, stomatal conductance, and leaf dieback in seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean shrubs during an intense drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 2015–2024.
67. Warren CR, Aranda I, Cano FJ. 2011. Responses to water stress of gas exchange and metabolites in Eucalyptus and Acacia spp. Plant, Cell & Environment 34: 1609–1629.
68. Warren CR, Aranda I, Cano FJ. 2012. Metabolomics demonstrates divergent responses of two Eucalyptus species to water stress. Metabolomics 8: 186–200.
69. Woodruff DR. 2014. The impacts of water stress on phloem transport in Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiology 34: 5–14.
70. Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC, Marias DE, Sevanto S, Jenkins MW, McDowell NG. 2014. Linking nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics to gas exchange and leaf hydraulic behavior in Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma. New Phytologist 206: 411–421.
71. Zeppel MJB, Harrison SP, Adams HD, Kelley DI, Li G, Tissue DT, Dawson TE, Fensham R, Medlyn BE, Palmer A et al. 2015. Drought and resprouting plants. New Phytologist 206: 583–589.
72. Zhang Y-J, Meinzer FC, Qi J-H, Goldstein G, Cao K-F. 2013. Midday stomatal conductance is more related to stem rather than leaf water status in subtropical deciduous and evergreen broadleaf trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 36: 149–158.