Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: a Global Review

Current environmental health reports

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 440-450

  Hajat, Anjum ^a   Hsia, Charlene ^a   O’Neill, Marie S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Criteria air pollutants; Environmental inequality; Environmental justice; Social disadvantage; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

DANGEROUS GOODS; PARTICULATE MATTER;

AIR POLLUTION; ANALYSIS; DANGEROUS GOODS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEALTH; HEALTH DISPARITY; HUMAN; PARTICULATE MATTER; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIOECONOMICS;

AIR POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GLOBAL HEALTH; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HUMANS; PARTICULATE MATTER; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84983788342     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21965412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-015-0069-5     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Bowen W. An analytical review of environmental justice research: what do we really know? Environ Manag. 2002;29:3–15.
2. Brown P. Race, class, and environmental health: a review and systematization of the literature. Environ Res. 1995;69:15–30.
3. Brulle RJ, Pellow DN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103–24.
4. Evans GW, Kantrowitz E. Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:303–31.
5. Miao Q, Chen DM, Buzzelli M, et al. Environmental equity research: review with focus on outdoor air pollution research methods and analytic tools. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2015;70:47–55.
6. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts JT. Environmental justice. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2009;34:405–30.
7. Pulido L. A critical review of the methodology of environmental racism research. Antipode. 1996;28:142–59.
8. Szasz A, Meuser M. Environmental inequalities: literature review and proposals for new directions in research and theory. Curr Sociol. 1997;45:99–120.
9. Ringquist EJ. Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: a meta‐analysis. J Policy Anal Manage. 2005;24:223–47.
10. Harper S, Ruder E, Roman HA, et al. Using inequality measures to incorporate environmental justice into regulatory analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:4039–59. This is a good review of the various inequality metrics that can be applied to environmental inequality studies.
11. Marshall JD. Environmental inequality: air pollution exposures in California’s South Coast Air Basin. Atmos Environ. 2008;42:5499–503.
12. Marshall JD, Swor KR, Nguyen NP. Prioritizing environmental justice and equality: diesel emissions in Southern California. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:4063–8. This paper measures both inequality and injustice in addition to the impact of the pollutant. Furthermore, it looks at source-specific air pollution which as noted above has policy and regulatory impact.
13. 2 air pollution in the United States. Plos One. 2014;9:8.
14. Laurent O, Bard D, Filleul L, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on the relationship between atmospheric pollution and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:665–75.
15. Institute of Medicine Committee on Environmental Justice. Toward environmental justice: research, education, and health policy needs. National Academies Press (US); 1999.
16. Morello-Frosch R, Shenassa ED. The environmental “riskscape” and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1150–3.
17. O’Neill MS, Jerrett M, Kawachi L, et al. Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1861–70.
18. Kaufman JS, Cooper RS. Commentary: considerations for use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic research. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:291–8.
19. World Health Organization. Environmental health inequalities in Europe: assessment report. 2012.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 2014. http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html. Accessed 31 July 2015.
21. European Commission. Air Quality Standards. 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm. Accessed 31 July 2015.
22. Backes CH, Nelin T, Gorr MW, et al. Early life exposure to air pollution: how bad is it? Toxicol Lett. 2013;216:47–53.
23. Bascom R, Bromberg PA, Costa DA, et al. Health effects of outdoor air pollution. Committee of the Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly of the American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:3–50.
24. Block ML, Elder A, Auten RL, et al. The outdoor air pollution and brain health workshop. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33:972–84.
25. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope 3rd CA, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:2331–78.
26. Gray SC, Edwards SE, Miranda ML. Race, socioeconomic status, and air pollution exposure in North Carolina. Environ Res. 2013;126:152–8.
27. Brochu PJ, Yanosky JD, Paciorek CJ, et al. Particulate air pollution and socioeconomic position in rural and urban areas of the northeastern United States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:S224–30.
28. Hajat A, Diez-Roux AV, Adar SD, et al. Air pollution and individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status: evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:1325–33. This is one of the few papers that evaluates both individual and neighborhood SES, using individual-level air pollution data, thus making it one of the few studies that does not have an ecological study design.
29. Bell ML, Ebisu K. Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1746–52.
30. Buzzelli M, Jerrett M. Geographies of susceptibility and exposure in the city: environmental inequity of traffic-related air pollution in Toronto. Can J Reg Sci. 2007;30:195–210.
31. Maroko AR. Using air dispersion modeling and proximity analysis to assess chronic exposure to fine particulate matter and environmental justice in New York City. Appl Geogr. 2012;34:533–47.
32. Crouse DL, Ross NA, Goldberg MS. Double burden of deprivation and high concentrations of ambient air pollution at the neighbourhood scale in Montreal, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:971–81.
33. Molitor J, Su J, Molitor NT, et al. Identifying vulnerable populations through an examination of the association between multi-pollutant profiles and poverty. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:7754–60.
34. Carrier M, Apparicio P, Seguin AM, et al. The application of three methods to measure the statistical association between different social groups and the concentration of air pollutants in Montreal: a case of environmental equity. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2014;30:38–52.
35. Miranda ML, Edwards SE, Keating MH, et al. Making the environmental justice grade: the relative burden of air pollution exposure in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:1755–71.
36. Su JG, Jerrett M, de Nazelle A, et al. Does exposure to air pollution in urban parks have socioeconomic, racial or ethnic gradients? Environ Res. 2011;111:319–28.
37. Brajer V, Hall JV. Changes in the distribution of air pollution exposure in the Los Angeles basin from 1990 to 1999. Contemp Econ Policy. 2005;23:50–8.
38. Grineski S, Bolin B, Boone C. Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations: environmental inequity in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. Soc Sci Q. 2007;88:535–54.
39. Kingham S, Pearce J, Zawar-Reza P. Driven to injustice? Environmental justice and vehicle pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2007;12:254–63.
40. Pearce J, Kingham S. Environmental inequalities in New Zealand: a national study of air pollution and environmental justice. Geoforum. 2008;39:980–93.
41. Pearce J, Kingham S, Zawar-Reza P. Every breath you take? Environmental justice and air pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand. Environ Plan A. 2006;38:919–38.
42. Rooney MS, Arku RE, Dionisio KL, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of particulate matter sources and pollution in four communities in Accra, Ghana. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435:107–14. This is the first study from Africa to evaluate SES inequalities, albeit briefly, in criteria air pollution concentrations. The exposure assessment uses a mobile monitoring platform to compensate for the lack of government air pollution data.
43. Fan XP, Lam KC, Yu Q. Differential exposure of the urban population to vehicular air pollution in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ. 2012;426:211–9. This is one of the few papers to highlight inequality in the distribution of criteria air pollutants in an Asian setting. This paper suggests that both residential mobility and market forces may influence air pollution exposure and shows how government housing policy can influence air pollution exposure.
44. Goodman A, Wilkinson P, Stafford M, et al. Characterising socio-economic inequalities in exposure to air pollution: a comparison of socio-economic markers and scales of measurement. Health Place. 2011;17:767–74.
45. Havard S, Deguen S, Zmirou-Navier D, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and socioeconomic status: a spatial autocorrelation study to assess environmental equity on a small-area scale. Epidemiology. 2009;20:223–30.
46. Richardson EA, Pearce J, Tunstall H, et al. Particulate air pollution and health inequalities: a Europe-wide ecological analysis. Int J Health Geogr. 2013;12:34.
47. Briggs D, Abellan JJ, Fecht D. Environmental inequity in England: small area associations between socio-economic status and environmental pollution. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1612–29.
48. Padilla CM, Kihal-Talantikite W, Vieira VM, et al. Air quality and social deprivation in four French metropolitan areas—a localized spatio-temporal environmental inequality analysis. Environ Res. 2014;134:315–24.
49. Branis M, Linhartova M. Association between unemployment, income, education level, population size and air pollution in Czech cities: evidence for environmental inequality? A pilot national scale analysis. Health Place. 2012;18:1110–4.
50. 2 and benzene in the Asturias INMA birth cohort, Spain. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68:29–36.
51. Chaix B, Gustafsson S, Jerrett M, et al. Children’s exposure to nitrogen dioxide in Sweden: investigating environmental injustice in an egalitarian country. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:234–41.
52. Fecht D, Fischer P, Fortunato L, et al. Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands. Environ Pollut. 2015;198:201–10.
53. Pearce JR, Richardson EA, Mitchell RJ, et al. Environmental justice and health: the implications of the socio‐spatial distribution of multiple environmental deprivation for health inequalities in the United Kingdom. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2010;35:522–39.
54. Maantay J. Mapping environmental injustices: pitfalls and potential of geographic information systems in assessing environmental health and equity. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:161–71.
55. Soobader M, Cubbin C, Gee GC, et al. Levels of analysis for the study of environmental health disparities. Environ Res. 2006;102:172–80.
56. Yanosky JD, Schwartz J, Suh HH. Associations between measures of socioeconomic position and chronic nitrogen dioxide exposure in Worcester, Massachusetts. J Toxic Environ Health A. 2008;71:1593–602.
57. Su JG, Larson T, Gould T, et al. Transboundary air pollution and environmental justice: Vancouver and Seattle compared. GeoJournal. 2010;75:595–608.
58. Zou B, Peng F, Wan N, et al. Sulfur dioxide exposure and environmental justice: a multi-scale and source-specific perspective. Atmos Pollut Res. 2014;5:491–9.
59. Rissman J, Arunachalam S, BenDor T, et al. Equity and health impacts of aircraft emissions at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Landsc Urban Plan. 2013;120:234–47.
60. Su JG, Jerrett M, Morello-Frosch R, et al. Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California. Environ Int. 2012;40:79–87.
61. Su JG, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM, et al. An index for assessing demographic inequalities in cumulative environmental hazards with application to Los Angeles, California. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:7626–34.
62. Barr LM, Pressey RL, Fuller RA, et al. A new way to measure the world’s protected area coverage. Plos One. 2011;6:4.
63. Fann N, Roman HA, Fulcher CM, et al. Maximizing health benefits and minimizing inequality: incorporating local‐scale data in the design and evaluation of air quality policies. Risk Anal. 2011;31:908–22.
64. Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, et al. An overview of methods for monitoring social disparities in cancer with an example using trends in lung cancer incidence by area-socioeconomic position and race-ethnicity, 1992–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:889–99.
65. Brauer M, Hoek G, van Vliet P, et al. Estimating long-term average particulate air pollution concentrations: application of traffic indicators and geographic information systems. Epidemiology. 2003;14:228–39.
66. Dionisio KL, Arku RE, Hughes AF, et al. Air pollution in Accra neighborhoods: spatial, socioeconomic, and temporal patterns. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:2270–6.
67. Oakes JM, Rossi PH. The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:769–84.
68. Fotso J-C, Kuate-Defo B. Measuring socioeconomic status in health research in developing countries: should we be focusing on households, communities or both? Soc Indic Res. 2005;72:189–237.
69. Townsend P. Deprivation. J Soc Policy. 1987;16:125–46.
70. McLennan D, Barnes H, Noble M, et al. The English indices of deprivation 2010. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2011.
71. Cesaroni G, Badaloni C, Romano V, et al. Socioeconomic position and health status of people who live near busy roads: the Rome Longitudinal Study (RoLS). Environ Health. 2010;9.
72. Dragano N, Hoffmann B, Moebus S, et al. Traffic exposure and subclinical cardiovascular disease: is the association modified by socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and neighbourhoods? Results from a multilevel study in an urban region. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:628–35.
73. Forastiere F, Stafoggia M, Tasco C, et al. Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: differential exposure or differential susceptibility. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:208–16.
74. Næss Ø, Piro FN, Nafstad P, et al. Air pollution, social deprivation, and mortality: a multilevel cohort study. Epidemiology. 2007;18:686–94.
75. Spalt EW, Curl CL, Allen RW, et al. Factors influencing time-location patterns and their impact on estimates of exposure: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015.
76. Saha R, Mohai P. Historical context and hazardous waste facility siting: understanding temporal patterns in Michigan. Soc Probl. 2005;52:618–48.