Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation on mangroves: A remote sensing-based comparison for two adjacent protected areas in Shenzhen And Hong Kong, China

Remote Sensing

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Jia, Mingming ^a   Liu, Mingyue ^a,b   Wang, Zongming ^a   Mao, Dehua ^a   Ren, Chunying ^a   Cui, Haishan ^c  

^a NORTHEAST INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND AGRICULTURAL ECOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c GUANGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Area weighted centroids; Landsat; Landscape metrics; Mangroves; National Nature Reserve; Object based method; Ramsar Convention; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; REMOTE SENSING;

LANDSAT; LANDSCAPE METRICS; MANGROVES; NATURE RESERVES; OBJECT-BASED METHODS; RAMSAR CONVENTION; WEIGHTED CENTROID;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84983744495     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs8080627     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Field, C.D. Rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystems, a review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1998, 37, 383-392.
2. Giri, C.P.B.; Zhu, Z.; Singh, A.; Tieszen, L.L. Monitoring mangrove forest dynamics of the sundarbans in Bangladesh and India using multi-temporal satellite data from 1973 to 2000. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2007, 73, 91-100.
3. Lewis, R.R. Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecol. Eng. 2005, 24, 403-418.
4. Bosire, J.O.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.;Walton, M.; Crona, B.I.; Lewis III, R.R.; Field, C.; Kairo, J.G.; Koedam, N. Functionality of restored mangroves a review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 251-259.
5. Valiela, I.; Bowen, J.L.; York, J.K. Mangrove forests: One of the worlds threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 2001, 51, 807-815.
6. Kamalil, B.; Hashim, R. Mangrove restoration without planting. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 387-391.
7. Blasco, F.; Aiapuru, M.; Gers, C. Depletion of the mangroves of continental asia. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 9, 245-256.
8. Matthews, G.V.T. The Ramsar Covention on Wetlands; Its History and Development; Secretariat, R.C., Ed.; Imprimerie Dupuis SA: Gland, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 4-7.
9. Spalding, M.; Kainuma, M.; Field, C. World Mangrove Atlas; Samara Publishing Co.: Okinawa, Japan, 1997.
10. Kuenzer, C.; Bluemel, A.; Gebhard, S.; Vo Quoc, T.; Dech, S. Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 878-928.
11. Jusoff, K. Individual mangrove species identification and mapping in Port Klang using airborne hyperspectral imaging. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2006, 1, 27-36.
12. Giri, C.; Muhlhausen, J. Mangrove forest distribution and dynamics in Madagascar (1975-2005). Sensors 2008, 8, 2104-2117.
13. Everitt, J.H.; Yang, C.; Sriharan, S.; Judd, F.W. Using high resolution satellite imagery to map black mangrove on the Texas Gulf Coast. J. Coast. Res. 2008, 24, 1582-1586.
14. Demuro, M.; Chisholm, L. Assessment of Hyperion for Characterizing Mangrove Communities. In Proceedings of the 12th JPL AVIRIS Airborne Earth Science Workshop, Pasadena, CA, USA, 24-28 February 2003.
15. Lucas, R.M.; Mitchell, A.L.; Rosenqvist, A.; Proisy, C.; Melius, A.; Ticehurst, C. The potential of L-band SAR for quantifying mangrove characteristics and change: Case studies from the tropics. Aquat. Conserv. 2007, 17, 245-264.
16. MacKay, H.; Finlayson, C.M.; Fernández-Prieto, D.; Davidson, N.; Pritchard, D.; Rebelo, L.-M. The role of Earth Observation (EO) technologies in supporting implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2234-2242.
17. Filho, P.W.M.S.; Martins, E.D.S.F.; da Costa, F.R. Using mangroves as a geological indicator of coastal changes in the Bragança macrotidal flat, Brazilian Amazon: A remote sensing data approach. Ocean Coast Manag. 2006, 49, 462-475.
18. Seto, K.C.; Fragkias, M. Mangrove conversion and aquaculture development in Vietnam: A remote sensing-based approach for evaluating the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2007, 17, 486-500.
19. Long, J.B.; Giri, C. Mapping the Philippines' mangrove forests using Landsat imagery. Sensors 2011, 11, 2972-2981.
20. Giri, C.; Ochieng, E.; Tieszen, L.; Singh, A.; Loveland, T.; Masek, J.; Duke, N. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20, 154-159.
21. Green, E.P.; Clark, C.D.; Mumby, P.J.; Edwards, A.J.; Ellis, A.C. Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 935-956.
22. Jia, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, C. Landsat-Based estimation of mangrove forest loss and restoration in Guangxi Province, China, influenced by human and natural factors. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2015, 8, 311-323.
23. Wang, Y.; Bonynge, G.; Nugranad, J.; Traber, M.; Ngusaru, A.; Tobey, J.; Hale, L.; Bowen, R.; Makota, V. Remote sensing of mangrove change along the Tanzania Coast. Mar. Geod. 2003, 26, 35-48.
24. Jia, M.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Song, K.; Ren, C.; Liu, B.; Mao, D. Mapping China's mangroves based on an object-oriented classification of Landsat imagery. Wetlands 2014, 34, 277-283.
25. Saito, H.; Bellan, M.F.; Al-Habshi, A.; Aizpuru, M.; Blasco, F. Mangrove research and coastal ecosystem studies with SPOT-4 HRVIR and TERRA ASTER in Arabian Gulf. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 4073-4092.
26. Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Jayatissa, L.P.; Di Nitto, D.; Bosire, J.O.; Lo Seen, D.; Koedam, N. How effective were mangroves as a defence against the recent tsunami? Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, R443-R447.
27. Wang, L.; Silván-Cárdenas, L.; Sousa, W.P. Neural network classification of mangrove species from multi-seasonal Ikonos imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2008, 74, 921-927.
28. Yang, C.; Everitt, J.H.; Fletcher, R.S.; Jensen, R.R.; Mausel, P.W. Evaluating AISA+ hyperspectral imagery for mapping black mangrove along the South Texas Gulf Coast. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2009, 75, 425-435.
29. Rasolofoharinoro, M.; Blasco, F.; Bellan, M.F.; Aizpuru, M.; Gauquelin, T.; Denis, J. A remote sensing based methodology for mangrove studies in Madagascar. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 1873-1886.
30. Heumann, B. Satellite remote sensing of mangrove forests: Recent advances and future opportunities. Prog. Phys. Geog. 2011, 35, 87-108.
31. Cracknell, A.P. Synergy in remote sensing-What's in a pixel? Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 2025-2047.
32. Blaschke, T.; Lang, S.; Lorup, E.; Strobl, J.; Zeil, P. Object-oriented Image Processing in an Integrated GIS/Remote Sensing Environment and Perspectives for Environmental Applications. In Environmental Information for Planning, Politics and the Public; Cremers, A., Greve, K., Eds.; Metropolis Verlag: Marburg, Germany, 2000; pp. 555-570.
33. Xie, Z.; Roberts, C.; Johnson, B. Object-based target search using remotely sensed data: A case study in detecting invasive exotic Australian Pine in South Florida. JSPRS J. Phptpgramm. 2008, 63, 647-660.
34. Hay, G.; Castilla, G. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline. In Object Based Image Analysis; Blaschke, T., Lang, S., Hay, G., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany; Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 93-112.
35. Berlanga-Robles, C.A.; Ruiz-Luna, A. Land use mapping and change detection in the coastal zone of northwest Mexico using remote sensing techniques. J. Coast. Res. 2002, 18, 514-522.
36. Conchedda, G.; Durieux, L.; Mayaux, P. An object-based method for mapping and change analysis in mangrove ecosystems. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63, 578-589.
37. Yu, Q.; Gong, P.; Chinton, N.; Biging, G.; Kelly, M.; Schirokauer, D. Object based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 72, 799-811.
38. Johnsson, K. Segment-based land-use classification from SPOT satellite data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1994, 60, 47-53.
39. Im, J.; Jensen, J. A change detection model based on neighborhood correlation image analysis and decision tree classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 99, 326-340.
40. RAMSAR. Available online: http://www.ramsar.org (accessed on 25 July 2016).
41. Zhang, K.M.; Wen, Z.G. Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in china. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 88, 1249-1261.
42. Liu, J.; Ouyang, Z.; Pimm, S.L.; Raven, P.H.; Wang, X.; Miao, H.; Han, N. Protecting chinas biodiversity. Science 2003, 300, 1240-1241.
43. Ouyang, Z.;Wang, X.; Miao, H.; Han, N. Problems of management system of china's nature preservation zones and their solutions. Sci. Tech. Rev. 2002, 1, 49-52.
44. Nature Reserve of China. Available online: http://www.nre.cn/(accessed on 25 February 2016).
45. Tam, N.F.Y.; Wong, Y.S. Hong Kong Mangroves; City University of Hong Kong Press: Hong Kong, China, 2000.
46. UNEP-WCMC. In the Front-Line: Shoreline Protection and Other Ecosystem Services from Mangroves and Coral Reefs; UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 5-9.
47. Chang, H.T.; Chen, G.Z.; Liu, Z.P.; Zhang, S.Y. Studies on Futian Mangrove Wetland Ecosystem, Shenzhen; Guangdong Province Guangdong Science and Technology Press: Guangzhou, China, 1998. (In Chinese)
48. Chen, G.Z.; Wang, Y.J.; Huang, Q.L. A study on the biodiversity and protection in futian national nature reserve of mangroves and birds, Shenzhen. Biodiv. Sci. 1997, 5, 104-111.
49. Deng, L.; Liu, G.-H.; Zhang, H.-M.; Xu, H.-L. Levels and assessment of organotin contamination at Futian. Region. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2015, 1, 18-24.
50. USGS. Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. Available online: http://glovis.usgs.gov (accessed on 18 September 2015).
51. ENVI User's Guide: Version 4.8; Research Systems, Inc.: Boulder, CO, USA, 2010.
52. Nazeer, M.; Nichol, J.E.; Yung, Y.K. Evaluation of atmospheric correction models and Landsat surface reflectance product in an urban coastal environment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 35, 6271-6291.
53. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). ArcGIS 9.3; Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI): Redlands, CA, USA, 2008.
54. Definiens AG. Definiens Professional 8.6 User Guide; Definiens AG: Munchen, Germany, 2011.
55. Baatz, M.; Schape, A. Multiresolution segmentation: An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung; Strbl, J., Blaschke, T., Eds.; Wichmann: Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 12-23.
56. Myint, S.W.; Giri, C.P.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z.; Gillette, S.C. Identifying mangrove species and their surrounding land use and land cover classes using an object-oriented approach with a lacunarity spatial measure. Gisci. Remote Sens. 2008, 45, 188-208.
57. Singh, S. Nearest-neighbor classifiers in natural scene analysis. Pattern Recogn. 2001, 34, 1601-1612.
58. Vaz, E. Managing urban coastal areas through landscape metrics: An assessment of Mumbai's mangrove system. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014, 98, 27-37.
59. UMass Landscape Ecology Lab. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html (accessed on 12 June 2015).
60. Baldi, G.; Guerschman, J.P.; Paruelo, J.M. Characterizing fragmentation in temperate South America grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 116, 197-208.
61. Mesev, V. The Use of Census Data in Urban Image Classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1998, 64, 431-438.
62. Shyrock, H.S.; Siegei, J.S.; Larmon, E.A. The Methods and Materials of Demography; U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1973.
63. 2 climate. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155, 237-255.
64. Wang, W.Q.;Wang, M. The Mangroves of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2007.
65. Manson, F.J.; Loneragan, N.R.; Phinn, S.R. Spatial and temporal variation in distribution of mangroves in moreton bay, subtropical australia: A comparisonof pattern metrics and change detection analyses based on aerial photographs. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2003, 57, 653-666.
66. Holguin, G.; Gonzalez-Zamorano, P.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Mendoza, R.; Amador, E.; Bashan, Y. Mangrove health in an arid environment encroached by urban development-A case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 363, 260-274.
67. Martinuzzi, S.; Gould, W.A.; Lugo, A.E.; Medina, E. Conversion and recovery of puerto rican mangroves: 200 years of change. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257, 75-84.
68. Ren, H.;Wu, X.; Ning, T.; Huang, G.;Wang, J.; Jian, S.; Lu, H. Wetland changes and mangrove restoration planning in Shenzhen bay, Southern China. Lands. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 7, 241-250.
69. Chen, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, G. Recent progresses in mangrove conservation, restoration and research in china. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 2, 45-54.
70. Wang, B.S.; Liao, B.W.; Wang, Y.J.; Zan, Q.J. Mangrove Forest Ecosystem and Its Sustaninable Development in Shenzhen Bay; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002. (In Chinese)
71. Li, M.; Liao, B.W. Introduction and ecological impact of Sonneratia apetala. Prot. For. Sci. Technol. 2008, 3, 100-102. (In Chinese with English abstract)
72. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD). Mai Po Inner Deep Bay RAMSAR Site Management Plan Executive Summary; Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department: Hong Kong, China, 2011.