Technical feasibility and safety of an intraoperative head-up display device during spine instrumentation

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Yoon, Jang W ^a   Chen, Robert E ^b,c   Han, Phillip K ^c   Si, Phong ^c   Freeman, William D ^a   Pirris, Stephen M ^a,d  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d St Vincent's Brain and Spine Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Google Glass; head up display; image guidance; navigation; pedicle screw; spine fusion; streaming; wearable computing

Indexed keywords

COPYRIGHTS; DISPLAY DEVICES; NEURONS; SCREWS; SURVEYS;

GOOGLE GLASS; GOOGLE+; HEAD-UPDISPLAY; HEADS-UP-DISPLAY; IMAGE GUIDANCES; NEURONAVIGATION; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINE FUSION; STREAMING; WEARABLE COMPUTING;

WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER NETWORK; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SOFTWARE; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PEDICLE SCREW; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; SPINE FUSION; SURGEON; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGY; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; INTRAOPERATIVE MONITORING; MIDDLE AGED; SAFETY; SPINE; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEURONAVIGATION; PEDICLE SCREWS; SAFETY; SPINE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84983649254     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1770     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Rahmathulla G, Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, et al. Intraoperative image-guided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance. J Neurosurg 2014; 36(3): E3.
2. Ormerod DF, Ross B, Naluai-Cecchini A. Use of an augmented reality display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 242–250.
3. Takeshita H, Kihara K, Yoshida S, et al. Clinical application of a modern high-definition head-mounted display in sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33(8): 1499–1504.
4. Liu D, Jenkins SA, Sanderson PM (eds.). Clinical implementation of a head-mounted display of patient vital signs. In 2009 ISWC'09 International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 2009 IEEE.
5. Abowd GD, Mynatt ED. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2000; 7(1): 29–58.
6. Feiner S, Macintyre B, Seligmann D. Knowledge-based augmented reality. Commun ACM 1993; 36(7): 53–62.
7. van Leijen M. A surgeon with Google Glass could look right through you. 2015 [October 1, 2015]; Available from: http://www.emirates247.com/news/a-surgeon-with-google-glass-could-look-right-through-you-2015-01-01-1.575136.
8. Chimenti PC, Mitten DJ. Google Glass as an alternative to standard fluoroscopic visualization for percutaneous fixation of hand fractures: a pilot study. Plastic reconstruct Surg 2015; 136(2): 328–330.
9. Wu TS, Dameff CJ, Tully JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous access using Google Glass. J Emerg Med 2014; 47(6): 668–675.
10. Macario A. What does one minute of operating room time cost? J Clin Anesth 2010; 22(4): 233–236.
11. Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, et al. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 2011; 35(9): 1961–1969.
12. Vorraber W, Voessner S, Stark G, et al. Medical applications of near-eye display devices: an exploratory study. Int J Surg 2014; 12(12): 1266–1272.