High quality standards for a large-scale prospective population-based observational cohort: Constances

BMC Public Health

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ruiz, Fabrice ^a   Goldberg, Marcel ^b   Lemonnier, Sylvie ^b   Ozguler, Anna ^b   Boos, Evelyne ^a   Brigand, Alain ^c   Giraud, Violaine ^d   Perez, Thierry ^e   Roche, Nicolas ^f   Zins, Marie ^b  

^a ClinSearch 110   (France)

^b UMS 011   (France)

^c Centre d'Examens de Santé d'Angoulême   (France)

^d HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

^e LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Cohort study; Epidemiological methods; Measurement tool development; Methodology; Respiratory

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL;

COHORT STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES AS TOPIC; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84983491101     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3439-5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Zins M, Goldberg M. The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;31:31.
2. CNAMTS. [ http://www.ameli.fr/. Accessed 14 Mar 2016].
3. Dugravot A, Sabia S, Shipley MJ, Welch C, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Detection of outliers due to participants' non-adherence to protocol in a longitudinal study of cognitive decline. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132110.
4. Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP) IEA guidelines for proper conduct of epidemiological research. [ http://ieaweb.org/good-epidemiological-practice-gep/. Accessed on 14 Mar 2016].
5. Whitney CW, Lind BK, Wahl PW. Quality assurance and quality control in longitudinal studies. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(1):71-80.
6. Liistro G, Vanwelde C, Vincken W, Vandevoorde J, Verleden G, Buffels J. Technical and functional assessment of 10 office spirometers: a multicenter comparative study. Chest. 2006;130(3):657-65.
7. Handbook of Epidemiology Wolfgang Ahrens, Iris Pigeot. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09834-0.
8. Mitchel JT, Kim YJ, Choi J, Park G, Cappi S, Horn D, Kist M, D. Agostino Jr RB. Evaluation of data entry errors and data changes to an electronic data capture clinical trial database. Drug Inf J. 2011;45(4):421-30.
9. Klipstein-Grobusch K, Georg T, Boeing H. Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl 1:S174-180.
10. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319-38.
11. Skloot GS, Edwards NT, Enright PL. Four-year calibration stability of the EasyOne portable spirometer. Respir Care. 2010;55(7):873-7.
12. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party standardization of lung function tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993;16:5-40.
13. Enright PL, Beck KC, Sherrill DL. Repeatability of spirometry in 18,000 adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(2):235-8.
14. Tan WC, Bourbeau J, O'Donnell D, Aaron S, Maltais F, Marciniuk D, Hernandez P, Cowie R, Chapman K, Sonia Buist A, et al. Quality assurance of spirometry in a population-based study -predictors of good outcome in spirometry testing. COPD. 2014;11(2):143-51.