Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging suggests normal perfusion in normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 135-141

  Ingrisch, Michael ^a   Sourbron, Steven ^b   Herberich, Sina ^a   Schneider, Moritz Jörg ^a   Kümpfel, Tania ^a   Hohlfeld, Reinhard ^a,c   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Ertl Wagner, Birgit ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c Technische Universität München Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology   (Germany)

Author keywords

dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; multiple sclerosis; normal appearing white matter

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NEUROMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN PERFUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRACRANIAL TUMOR; MALE; MEAN TRANSIT TIME; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PERMEABILITY; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; WHITE MATTER; YOUNG ADULT; BRAIN CIRCULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, RELAPSING-REMITTING; WHITE MATTER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84983488981     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000320     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brooks DJ, Leenders KL, Head G, et al. Studies on regional cerebral oxygen utilisation and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:1182-1191.
2. Sun X, TanakaM, Kondo S, et al. Clinical significance of reduced cerebral metabolism inmultiple sclerosis: a combined PETand MRI study. Ann NuclMed. 1998; 12:89-94.
3. Lycke J, Wikkelsö C, Bergh AC, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow in multiple sclerosis measured by single photon emission tomography with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime. Eur Neurol. 1993;33:163-167.
4. Law M, Saindane AM, Ge Y, et al. Microvascular abnormality in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis: perfusion MR imaging findings in normalappearing white matter. Radiology. 2004;231:645-652.
5. Adhya S, Johnson G, Herbert J, et al. Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T. Neuroimage. 2006;33:1029-1035.
6. Ge Y, LawM, Johnson G, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusionMR imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions: characterizing hemodynamic impairment and inflammatory activity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26: 1539-1547.
7. IngleseM, Adhya S, Johnson G, et al. Perfusionmagnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:164-171.
8. Saindane AM, Law M, Ge Y, et al. Correlation of diffusion tensor and dynamic perfusion MR imaging metrics in normal-Appearing corpus callosum: support for primary hypoperfusion in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28:767-772.
9. D'haeseleer M, BeelenR, FierensY, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion inmultiple sclerosis is reversible and mediated by endothelin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110:5654-5658.
10. D'haeseleerM, Hostenbach S, Peeters I, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion: a new pathophysiologic concept in multiple sclerosis? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35: 1406-1410.
11. Bester M, Forkert ND, Stellmann JP, et al. Increased perfusion in normal appearing white matter in high inflammatory multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119356.
12. IngrischM, Sourbron S, Morhard D, et al. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in multiple sclerosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 3D at 3 T. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:252-258.
13. Ingrisch M, Sourbron S. Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013;40:281-300.
14. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1988.
15. Song T, Laine AF, Chen Q, et al. Optimal k-space sampling for dynamic contrastenhanced MRI with an application to MR renography. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 61:1242-1248.
16. Sourbron S, Biffar A, Ingrisch M, et al. PMI: platform for research in medical imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phy. 2009;22(suppl 1):539.
17. Sourbron S, IngrischM, Siefert A, et al. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:205-217.
18. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. Available at: http://www. R-project.org. Accessed March 17, 2015.
19. Zeileis A, Hothorn T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News. 2002;2(3):7-10.
20. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67. Available at: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v67/i01/. Accessed January 19, 2016.
21. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14: 365-376.
22. Larsson HB, Rosenbaum S, Fritz-Hansen T. Quantification of the effect of water exchange in dynamic contrastMRI perfusionmeasurements in the brain and heart. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:272-281.
23. Paudyal R, Poptani H, Cai K, et al. Impact of transvascular and cellular-interstitial water exchange on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging estimates of blood to tissue transfer constant and blood plasmavolume.JMagnReson Imaging. 2013;37:435-444.
24. Buckley DL, Kershaw LE, Stanisz GJ. Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:1011-1019.
25. Bains LJ, McGrath DM, Naish JH, et al. Tracer kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT bladder cancer data: a preliminary comparison to assess the magnitude of water exchange effects. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64: 595-603.
26. Knutsson L, Ståhlberg F, Wirestam R. Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities. MAGMA. 2010;23:1-21.
27. Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA, Errante Y, et al. Gadodiamide and dentate nucleus T1 hyperintensity in patients with meningioma evaluated by multiple follow-up contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance examinations with no systemic interval therapy. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:470-472.
28. Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA, et al. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patientswith normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:685-690.
29. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015;275:772-782.
30. Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:102-116.
31. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:R1-R33.
32. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:1004-1027.
33. Cramer SP, Simonsen H, Frederiksen JL, et al. Abnormal blood-brain barrier permeability in normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis investigated by MRI. NeuroImage Clin. 2014;4:182-189.
34. Cramer SP, Larsson HB. Accurate determination of blood-brain barrier permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI: a simulation and in vivo study on healthy subjects and multiple sclerosis patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1655-1665.
35. Heye AK, Thrippleton MJ, Armitage PA, et al. Tracer kinetic modelling for DCE-MRI quantification of subtle blood-brain barrier permeability. Neuroimage. 2016;125:446-455.