Failure to Converge: Presidential Candidates, Core Partisans, and the Missing Middle in American Electoral Politics

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 667, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 143-165

  Bartels, Larry M ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

candidates; core partisans; Democrats; political polarization; presidential elections; Republicans; swing voters

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983485964     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716216661145     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C.H.AchenChristopher H.L.M.BartelsLarry M.2016. Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. J.H.AldrichJohn H.1983. A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review77:974–90.
3. J.H.AldrichJohn H.1995. Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. P.H.AransonPeter H.P.C.OrdeshookPeter C.1972. Spatial strategies for sequential elections. In Probability models of collective decision making, eds., 298–331. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
5. L.M.BartelsLarry M.1998. Where the ducks are: Voting power in a party system. In Politicians and party politics, ed., 43–79. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. L.M.BartelsLarry M.2010. Base appeal: The political attitudes and priorities of core partisans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. Available from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/larrybartels/files/2011/12/Base_Appeal.pdf.
7. H.E.BradyHenry E.P.M.SnidermanPaul M.1985. Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review79:1061–78.
8. E.G.CarminesEdward G.J.WoodsJames. 2002. The role of party activists in the evolution of the abortion issue. Political Behavior24:361–77.
9. J.D.ClintonJoshua D.I.KatznelsonIraJ.S.LapinskiJohn S.2016. Where measures meet history: Party polarization during the New Deal and Fair Deal. In Governing in a polarized age: Elections, parties, and political representation, ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. M.CohenMartinM.C.McGrathMary C.P.AronowPeterJ.ZallerJohn. 2016. Ideologically Extreme Candidates in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1948–2012. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
11. M.CohenMartyD.KarolDavidH.NoelHansJ.ZallerJohn. 2008. The party decides: Presidential nomination before and after reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. A.DownsAnthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
13. J.M.EnelowJames M.M.J.HinichMelvin J.1984. The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. M.P.FiorinaMorris P.S.J.AbramsSamuel J.2009. Disconnect: The breakdown of representation in American politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
15. D.FroomkinDan.6February2013. How the mainstream press bungled the single biggest story of the 2012 campaign. Huffpost Media.
16. J.HackerJacobP.PiersonPaul. 2005. Off center: The Republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. M.R.HersheyMarjorie Randon. 2009. Party politics in America. 13th ed.New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
18. T.M.HolbrookThomas M.S.D.McClurgScott D.2005. The mobilization of core supporters: Campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science49:689–703.
19. E.KleefeldEric.18April2008. Hillary privately blasted “the activist base of the Democratic Party” for caucus defeats. Available from tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com.
20. P.KrugmanPaul.7August2015. From Trump on down, the Republicans can’t be serious. New York Times.
21. G.LaymanGeoffrey. 2001. The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
22. T.E.MannThomas E.N.J.OrnsteinNorman J.2012. It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
23. J.MartinJonathanP.HealyPatrick. 16February2016. Obama’s options for a Supreme Court nominee, and the potential fallout. New York Times.
24. K.T.PooleKeith T.H.RosenthalHoward. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
25. W.L.RiordonWilliam L.1905/1963. Plunkitt of Tammany Hall: A series of very plain talks on very practical politics. New York, NY: E. P. Dutton.
26. W.J.StoneWalter J.A.I.AbramowitzAlan I.1983. Winning may not be everything, but it’s more than we thought: Presidential party activists in 1980. American Political Science Review77:945–56.