Urban regeneration: Who defines the indicators?

The Politics of Evaluation: Participation and Policy Implementation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 41-56

  Ambrose, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983422031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Ambrose, P. and MacDonald, D. (2000) ‘The New Deal mandatory indicators — a critique’, The East Brighton New Deal for Communities Benchmarking and Monitoring Project: Final Report, (Appendix), Report to Brighton and Hove Council, Brighton: Health and Social Policy Research Centre, University of Brighton.
2. Barr, A. and Hashagen, S. (2000)Achieving better community development: ABCD handbook, London: Community Development Foundation.
3. Burns, D. and Taylor, M. (2000)Auditing community participation, Bristol/York: The Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
4. Chanan, G. (1999) Local community involvement: A handbook for good practice, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and the Community Development Foundation.
5. COGS (2000) Active partners: Benchmarking community participation in regeneration, Yorkshire Forward.
6. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999) ‘Achieving best value through partnership: Evaluating the contribution of partnership to best value’ (www.local.dtlr.gov.uk/research/bestval/paper7/09.htm).
7. Foot, J. (2001)Summary of existing approaches and issues re Performance Indicators to measure Community Involvement, Background Paper, London: Audit Commission Seminar, December.
8. Greene, J. et al (2001) ‘The merits of mixing methods in evaluation’, Evaluation, London: Sage Publications.
9. Jones, D. (2001)Using performance indicators, London: Audit Commission.
10. Leeuw, F. (2001) ‘Some methodological and substantive issues associated with the evaluation of partnerships’, Department of Sociology: Utrecht University (President of the European Evaluation Society), Paper for the 4th World Bank Evaluation Conference, Washington, 23-24 July.
11. New Economics Foundation and Barclays plc (2000)Prove it! Measuring the effect of neighbourhood renewal on local people, London: NEF and Barclays.
12. Roche, C. (2001)Evaluating partnerships for community development: Discussant notes, Oxford: Oxfam GB.
13. Tichelar, M. (1998) ‘Evaluating performance indicators: current trends in local government’, Local Government Studies, vol 24, no 3, Autumn, pp 29-35.
14. World Bank (2001) The World Bank’s experience with local participation and partnerships: Lessons from an OECD evaluation, World Bank, 23 July.