Text in context: The fate of emergent climate regulation after UARG and EME Homer

Harvard Environmental Law Review

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 23-35

  Carlson, Ann E ^a   Herzog, Megan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84983397630     PISSN: 01478257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 79 Fed. Reg. 34,830 (June 18, 2014) [hereinafter Clean Power Plan Proposed Rule].
2. Jason J. Czarnezki, An Empirical Investigation of Judicial Decisionmaking, Statutory Interpretation, and the Chevron Doctrine in Environmental Law, 79 U. COLO. L. REV. 767, 768 (2008).
3. For a more detailed description of the case, see Cecilia Segal, Climate Regulation Under the Clean Air Act in the Wake of Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA: Introduction, 39 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 1, 5-6 (2015).
4. See Am. Coll. of Env't Lawyers, Memorandum for ECOS Concerning Clean Air Act 111(d) Issues 5 (Feb. 22, 2014), http://perma.cc/3QZP-TTEF.
5. See id. at 34,835, 34,848-51; EPA, SURVEY OF EXISTING STATE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS THAT REDUCE POWER SECTOR CO2 EMISSIONS 6 (2014), http://perma.cc/R5R3-UPF8.
6. See id. at 34,855-92; EPA, OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, DOCKET ID NO. EPA-HQ-OAR- 2013-0602, GOAL COMPUTATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT 3-4 (2014), http://perma.cc/3J QK-PSBS.
7. See William Boyd, Public Utility and the Low Carbon Future, 61 UCLA L. REV. 1614, 1622 (2014)
8. MIT THE FUTURE OF THE ELECTRIC GRID 1 (2011), http://perma.cc/FJ6C-7DWY.
9. See also Incorporating Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy in State and Tribal Implementation Plans, EPA, http://perma.cc/J5HJ-ALY8.
10. Cf. Thomas J. Miles & Cass R. Sunstein, Do Judges Make Regulatory Policy? An Empirical Investigation of Chevron, 73 U. CHIC. L. REV. 823 (2006) (demonstrating that Justices' political convictions influence the Court's Chevron analyses).