Satellite-based ground PM2.5 estimation using timely structure adaptive modeling

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 186, Issue , 2016, Pages 152-163

  Fang, Xin ^a   Zou, Bin ^a   Liu, Xiaoping ^b   Sternberg, Troy ^c   Zhai, Liang ^d  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d CHINESE ACADEMY OF SURVEYING AND MAPPING   (China)

Author keywords

Aerosol optical depth (AOD); Air pollution mapping; PM2.5; Satellite remote sensing; Timely structure adaptive modeling (TSAM)

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE OPTICS; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; LAND USE; MAPPING; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITES;

ADAPTIVE MODELING; AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTHS; PM2.5; POLLUTION MAPPING; SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING;

AIR POLLUTION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AEROSOL; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ESTIMATION METHOD; NUMERICAL METHOD; OPTICAL DEPTH; PARTICULATE MATTER; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA;

CHINA;

EID: 84983390900     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Fotheringham, A.S., Charlton, M., Brunsdon, C., The geography of parameter space: An investigation of spatial non-stationary. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 10 (1996), 605–627.
2. Gauderman, W.J., Avol, E., Gilliland, F., Vora, H., Thomas, D., Berhane, K., et al. The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. N. Engl. J. Med. 351 (2004), 1057–1067.
3. 2.5 concentrations in China using satellite-based aerosol optical depth and a chemical transport model. Remote Sens. Environ. 166 (2015), 262–270.
4. Hoek, G., Krishnan, R.M., Beelen, R., Peters, A., Ostro, B., Brunekreef, B., et al. Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: A review. Environ. Health, 12, 2013 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-43).
5. Hu, H.Y., The distribution of population in China, with statistics and maps. Acta Geograph. Sin. 1935:2 (1935), 33–74 (In Chinese).
6. 2.5 concentrations in the Southeastern United States using MAIAC AOD retrievals and a two-stage model. Remote Sens. Environ. 140 (2014), 220–232.
7. 2.5 concentrations in the southeastern US estimated using high-resolution satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (2014), 6301–6314.
8. Hystad, P., Setton, E., Cervates, A., Poplawski, K., Deschenes, S., Brauer, M., et al. Creating national air pollution models for population exposure assessment in Canada. Environ. Health Perspect. 119 (2011), 1123–1129.
9. Jinnagara Puttaswamy, S., Nguyen, H.M., Braverman, A., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Statistical data fusion of multi-sensor AOD over the Continental United States. Geocarto International 29:1 (2014), 48–64.
10. 2.5 geographical distribution in Mexico City. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:14 (2015), 8576–8584.
11. 2.5 concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (2011), 7991–8002.
12. Lee, M., Kloog, I., Chudnovsky, A., Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Melly, S., et al. Spatiotemporal prediction of fine particulate matter using high-resolution satellite images in the Southeastern US 2003–2011. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 2015, 1–8 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.41).
13. Lim, S.S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A.D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., AdairRohani, H., et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor cluster in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380 (2012), 2224–2260.
14. 2.5 in the eastern United States using satellite remote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:9 (2005), 3269–3278.
15. 2.5 concentrations in the St. Louis area: a comparison between MISR and MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 107 (2007), 33–44.
16. 2.5 concentrations using satellite data, meteorology, and land use information. Environ. Health Perspect. 117:6 (2009), 886–892.
17. 2.5 in China using satellite remote sensing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 7436–7444.
18. 2.5 concentration: China, 2004–2013. Environ. Health Perspect. 124 (2016), 184–192.
19. 2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), 5800–5806.
20. 2.5) on mortality in nine French cities. Atmos. Environ. 95 (2014), 175–184.
21. Pearson, K., On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points is space. Philosophical Magazine Series 62:11 (1901), 559–572.
22. 2.5 concentration in China from 1999 to 2011. Remote Sens. Environ., 174, 109–121.
23. Pope, C.A., Burnett, R.T., Thun, M.J., Calle, E.E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287:9 (2002), 1132–1141.
24. Qian, Y., Giorgi, F., Regional climatic effects of anthropogenic aerosols? The case of Southwestern China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27:21 (2000), 3521–3524.
25. Rodriguez, J.D., Perez, A., Lozano, J.A., Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32 (2010), 569–575.
26. Rohde, R.A., Muller, R.A., Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PLoS One, 10(8), 2015, e0135749, 10.1371/-journal.pone. 0135749.
27. 2.5 estimation over the Pearl River Delta region in China. Remote Sens. Environ. 154 (2014), 1–7.
28. 2.5) concentration in southern Ontario from satellite remote sensing and ground-based meteorological measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 114 (2010), 221–229.
29. van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R.V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R.C., Verduzco, C., et al. Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ. Health Perspect. 118 (2010), 143–1446.
30. 2.5 from optimal estimation and geographically weighted regression over North America. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), 10482–10491.
31. 2.5 mass: implication for air quality studies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(21).
32. Wang, Y., Yao, L., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Ji, D., Tang, G., et al. Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57 (2014), 14–25.
33. Wu, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, X., Tian, X., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., et al. Synergy of satellite and ground based observations in estimation of particulate matter in eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 433 (2012), 20–30.
34. 10 concentration in northwestern China using geographically weighted regression based on satellite AOD combined with CALIPSO and MODIS fire count. Remote Sens. Environ. 168 (2015), 276–285.
35. 2.5 concentration in China using geographically weighted regression based on MODIS and MISR AOD. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23:9 (2016), 8327–8338.
36. 2.5) mass concentration near the ground from satellite observation. Remote Sens. Environ. 160 (2015), 252–262.
37. 2.5 concentrations over three megalopolises in China using satellite-derived aerosol optical depth measurements. Atmos. Environ. 124 (2016), 232–242.
38. Zou, B., Wilson, J.G., Zhan, F.B., Zeng, Y., Wu, K., Spatial-temporal variations of regional ambient sulfur dioxide concentration and source contribution analysis: a dispersion modeling approach. Atmos. Environ. 45:28 (2011), 4977–4985.
39. 2.5 concentration mapping: a multidimensional perspective. Sci. Report., 5, 2015, 8698 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep08698).
40. 2.5 concentrations with a multifactorial radial basis function neural network. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22:14 (2015), 10395–10404.
41. Zou, B., Pu, Q., Bilal, M., Weng, Q., Zhai, L., Nichol, J.E., High-resolution satellite mapping of fine particulates based on geographically weighted regression. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 13:4 (2016), 495–499.
42. Zou, B., Zheng, Z., Wan, N., Qiu, Y., Wilson, J.G., An optimized spatial proximity model for fine particulate matter air pollution exposure assessment in areas of sparse monitoring. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 30:4 (2016), 727–747.