Optimization as a support for selection and design of aircraft actuation systems

7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 1343-1350

  Andersson, Johan ^a   Krust, Fetter ^a   Nilsson, Katarina ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SAAB AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SURFACES; ELECTRIC MACHINE CONTROL; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS; FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS; HYDRAULIC ACTUATORS; OPTIMIZATION;

AIRCRAFT ACTUATION SYSTEM; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; ENGINEERING DOMAINS; FLIGHT CONTROL SURFACE; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUES; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION;

FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

EID: 84983171284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Andersson J., Pohl J., Krus P. (1998), Design of Multi-Domain Systems Using Optimization, The Second NordDesign Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 26-28 August.
2. Bildstein M. (1998), Application of electrohydrostatic actuators (EHA) for future aircraft primary flight controls, 1. Internationales Fluidtechnisches Kolloquium, Aachen, Germany.
3. Box M. J. (1965), A new method of constraint optimization and a comparison with other methods, Computer Journal 8:42-52.
4. Clough B. (1998), Lessons Learned: Flight Control System Electrical Actuator Development, SAE Aerospace Power Systems Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, 21- 23 April.
5. Cohen L. (1995), Quality function deployment: how to make QFD work for you, Addison- Wesley, Reading.
6. Frischemeier S. (1997), Power-by-Wire- Technologie fuer die Flugsteuerung', German Annual Aerospace Congress (DGLRJahrestagung 1997), Munich, Germany.
7. Frischemeier S. (1997), Electro-hydrostatic actuators for aircraft primary flight controltypes, modeling and evaluation, The Fifth Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, Linko'ping, Sweden, 28-30 May.
8. Goldberg D. E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading
9. Hopsan (1991), Hopsan, A Simulation Package, User's Guide, Technical Report LITH-IKP-R- 704, Div. of Fluid and Mech. Eng. Systems, Dept. of Mech. Eng., Linkoping University, Sweden.
10. Horn J., Nafpliotis N. (1993), Multiobjective Optimization Using the Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm, Technical Report No. 93005, Illinois Genetic Algorithm Laboratory, Dept. of General Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, USA
11. Jansson A. (1994), Fluid Power System Design A Simulation Approach, Dissertation, Linkoping University, Linkoping
12. Johns P. B., Brien M. A., (1980), Use of the transmission line modeling (t.l.m.) method to solve lumped networks, The Radio Electron and Engineer, 50:59-70
13. Krus P., Jansson A., Palmberg J.-O. (1993), Optimisation based on Simulation for Design of Fluid Power Systems, Proceedings of IMECH International Conference on Aircraft Hydraulics and Systems, London, UK
14. Krus P., Jansson A., Palmberg J.-O., Weddfelt K., (1990), Distributed simulation of hydromechanical systems, Third Bath International Fluid Power Workshop, Bath, UK.
15. Navarro R. (1997), Performance of an Electro- Hydrostatic Actuator on the F-18 Systems Research Aircraft, NASA/TM-97-206224
16. Pahl G., Beitz W. (1996), Engineering Design - A Systematic Approach, Springer, London.
17. Raymond E. T., Chenoweth C. C. (1993), Aircraft Flight Control Actuation System Design, SAE, Warrendale, USA
18. Smith R. P., Eppinger S. D. (1997), Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, March 1997, pp. 276-293
19. Steward D. V. (1981), The design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, vol. EM-28, no.3 August 1981, pp. 71-74.