Higher-order staggered and subiteration free algorithms for coupled dynamic aeroelasticity problems

36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages

  Farhat, Charbel ^a   Lesoinne, Michel ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AEROELASTICITY; AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; CONTROL NONLINEARITIES; ELASTIC WAVES;

AEROELASTIC PROBLEMS; COUPLED DYNAMICS; FLUTTER ANALYSIS; HIGHER-ORDER; NONLINEAR AEROELASTICITY; STAGGERED ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84983161204     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Donea, An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient fluid-structure interactions, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 33 (1982) 689-723.
2. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne and N. Maman, Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Fluids 21 (1995) 807-835.
3. J. T. Batina, Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper No. 89-0115, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 9-12, 1989.
4. S. A. Morton, R. B. Melville, and M. R. Visbal, Accuracy and coupling issues of aeroelastic Navier-Sokes solutions of deforming meshes, AIAA Paper 97-1085, 38th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, April 7-10, 1997.
5. R. D. Rausch, J. T. Batina and T. Y. Yang, Euler flutter analysis of airfoils using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper No. 89-13834, 30th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Mobile, Alabama, April 3-5, 1989.
6. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, P. S. Chen and S. Lantéri, Parallel heterogeneous algorithms for the solution of three-dimensional transient coupled aeroelastic problems, AIAA Paper No. 95-1290, AIAA 36th Structural Dynamics Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 10-13, 1995.
7. S. Piperno, C. Farhat and B. Larrouturou, Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 124 (1995) 79-11.
8. K. K. Gupta, Development of a finite element aeroelastic analysis capability, Journal of Aircraft 33 (1996) 995-1002.
9. J. Mouro, Numerical simulation of nonlinear fluid structure interactions problems and application to hydraulic shock-absorbers, in Proc. Third World Conf. Appl. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Basel World User Days CFD, May 19-23, 1996.
10. C. A. Felippa and T. L. Geers, Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems, Engineering Computations 5 (1988) 123-133.
11. S. K. Weeratunga and E. Pramono, Direct coupled aeroelastic analysis through concurrent implicit time integration on a parallel computer, AIAA Paper No. 94-1550, April 1994.
12. M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 134 (1996) 71-90.
13. P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombard, Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on moving grids, AIAA J. 17 (1979) 1030-1037.
14. C. Farhat and S. Lantéri, Simulation of compressible viscous flows on a variety of MPPs: computational algorithms for unstructured dynamic meshes and performance results, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 119 (1994) 35-60.
15. E. C. Yates, AGARD standard aeroelastic configuration for dynamic response, candidate configuration I.-Wing 445. 6, NASA TM-100492, 1987.
16. E. M. Lee-Rausch and J. T. Batina, Wing-flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method, AIAA Paper No. 93-1422, 1993.