Two-Point Design Optimization of Transonic Airfoil using Response Surface Methodology

37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages

  Ahn, Jaekwon ^a   Yee, Kwanjung ^a   Lee, Dong Ho ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRFOILS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRANSONIC FLOW; TURBULENCE MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL BURDEN; HIGH SPEED CIVIL TRANSPORTS; NAVIER-STOKES SOLVER; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OFF-DESIGN PERFORMANCE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SST TURBULENCE MODELS; STEPWISE REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT;

EID: 84983142838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-403     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Anthony A. Guinta,”Aircraft Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Using Design of Experimental Theory and Response Surface Modeling Methods”, Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, May 1997, Blacksburg, VA
2. Susan Burgee, Anthony A. Guinta, Vladimir Balalbanov, Bernard Grossman, William H. Mason, Robert Narducci, Raphael T. Haftka, and Layne T. Watson, “A Coarse-Grained Parallel Variable-Complexity Multidisciplinary Optimization Paradigm”, The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Computing, Vol.10, No.4, Winter 1996, pp.269-299
3. Myers R.H. and Montgomery, D.C., Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, pp. 1-141, 279-401, 462-480, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY (1995)
4. Hogg, R. V. and Ledolter, J., Applied Statistics for Engineers and Physical Scientist, Macmillin, New York, NY, 2nd edition (1992)
5. Gerhard Venter, Raphael T. Haftka and James H. Stames, Jr., “Construction of Response Surfaces for Design Optimization Applications”, AIAA-96-4040-CP
6. Kim, H. J. and Rho, O.H., “Dual-Point Design of Transonic Airfoils Using the Hybrid Inverse Optimization Method”, Joumal of Aircraft, Vol.34, No.5, pp.612-618
7. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. and Haftka, R. T. Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developtment”, AIAA Paper No. 96-0711 (1996)
8. G. Kuruvila, Shlom Ta’asan, and M. D. Salas,” Airfoil Design and Optimization by the One-Shot Method”, AIAA 95-0478, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 9-12, 1995, Reno, NV
9. Jameson, A., Pierce, N. A., Martinelli, L., “Optimum Aerodynamic Design using the Navier-Stokes Equation”, AIAA 97-0099, Jan. 1997
10. Cook, P.H., Mcdonald, M.A., and Firmin, M.C.O., “AerofoiI RAE2822 - Pressure Distribution, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements”, AGARD AR 138, May 1979, A6-1-A6-77
11. Johnston, L. J., “Solution of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equation for Tansonic Aerofoil Flows”, Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 28, NO. 3, 1991, pp. 216-224
12. Lee, K. D. and Eyi, S., “Aerodynamic Design via Optimization”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol.29, No.6, Nov. 1992
13. Hager, J. O., Eyi, S. and Lee, K.D., “Two-Point Transonic Design Using Optimization for Improved Off-Design Performance”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 3l, No. 5, Sep. 1994
14. Marija J. Norusis,”SPSS 6.1 Guide to Data Analysis”, Prentice-Hall Inc.