Constrained aerodynamic optimisation of a supersonic transport wing: A European collaborative study

16th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 186-195

  Rolston, S C ^a   Doherty, J J ^b   Evans, T P ^b   Grenon, R ^c   Averardo, M A ^d  

^a AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c ONERA   (France)

^d Alenia   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; FLOW SEPARATION; MESH GENERATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; TRANSONIC AERODYNAMICS; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

AERODYNAMIC EFFICIENCY; AERODYNAMIC OPTIMISATION; AERODYNAMIC TECHNOLOGY; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS; OPTIMISATION DESIGNS; OPTIMISATION PROBLEMS; SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT;

SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT;

EID: 84983134906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-2516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Green P. K., Pacull M., Reimers H. D., 'European 2nd generation supersonic transport aircraft.' 7th European Aerospace Conference, Toulouse, France. Oct 1994.
2. Wilde M. G., Cormery M., 'The derivation of the Concorde wing' presented at the 11 th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, London 8-12th Sept 1996.
3. Doe R. H., 'Linearised methods for Supersonic Flow' AGARD Report No. 679 paper 17.
4. Lovell D., 'Reduction of wave and liftdependent drag for supersonic transport aircraft.' ICAS-98-2, 2, 1.
5. Henne P., Slooff J. W., 'Computational methods for aerodynamic design(inverse) and optimisation; Technical evaluators remarks and round table discussion.' AGARDCP 463 Loen 1989.
6. Kid Lee, Sinan Eyi 'Aerodynamic design via optimisation.' ICAS-90-6. 9. 1 1990.
7. Reneaux J., Thibert J-J., The use of numerical optimisation for aerofoil design.' AIAA paper no 85-5026, 1985.
8. Vanderplaats G. N., 'CONMIN-A Fortran program for constrained function minimisation.' NASA TM X-62282 1973.
9. Skrobanski J. J., 'Optimisation subject to non-linear constraints.' PhD Thesis, London University 1986.
10. Amendola A., et Al 'Aerodynamic investigations of Supersonic Aircraft Configuration.' 7th European Aerospace Conference, Toulouse, France. Oct 1994.
11. Middleton W. D., Lundry, J. L.' A Computational System for aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft' NASA Reports No. CR-2715/16/17.
12. Villot, A.-M., et Al. '3D Turbomachinery Euler and Navier-Stokes Calculations with a Multidomain cell-centred approach,' AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 29th Joint Propulsion Conference And Exhibit, Monterey, CA. June 28-30, 1993.
13. Grenon R., 'Numerical optimisation in aerodynamic design with application to a supersonic transport aircraft.' NAL International Workshop on Supersonic Transport Design Tokyo (Japan), March 1998, ONERA TP 1998-16.
14. Doherty J. J., Parker N. T., 'Dual point design of a supersonic transport wing using a constrained optimisation method.' 7th European Aerospace Conference, Toulouse, France. Oct 1994.
15. Shaw J. A., Peace A. J., May N., Pocock M., 'Verification of the CFD system SAUNA for complex aircraft configurations.' AIAA Paper 94-0393 1994.
16. Lock R. C., "An equivalence law relating three-and two-dimensional pressure distributions," ARC R&M 3346 1962.