Approximation model building and multidisciplinary design optimization using response surface methods

6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 592-598

  Unal, R ^a   Lepsch, R A ^b   Engelund, W ^b   Stanley, D O ^b  

^a Old Dominion University   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TAGUCHI METHODS;

APPROXIMATION MODEL; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; LAUNCH VEHICLE DESIGN; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY DESIGNS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

DESIGN;

EID: 84983132620     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Kackar, R., “Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 17, No.4 (1985), pp. 176-188.
2. Bryne, D. M. and S. Taguchi, “The Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design,” ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, Anaheim (1986), p. 168.
3. Phadke, S. M., Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1989).
4. Hunter, J., “Statistical Design Applied to Product Design,”" Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 17, No. 4 (1985), pp. 210-221.
5. Box, G. E. and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley, New York, NY (1987).
6. Hicks, C., Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY (1973).
7. Kackar, R., E. Lagergren and J. Fillibe, “Taguchi’s Fixed-Element Arrays are Fractional Factorials,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 23, No.2 (1991), pp. 107-115.
8. Taguchi, G. and S. Konishi, Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs, American Supplier Institute Inc., Dearborn, MI (1987).
9. Stanley, D. O., R. Unal and R. Joyner, “Application of Taguchi Methods to Dual Mixture Ratio Propulsion System Optimization for SSTO Vehicles,” AIAA-92-0213 (January 1992).
10. Wille, R., “Landing Gear Weight Optimization Using Taguchi Analysis,” Society of Allied Weight Engineers (SAWE) Paper No. 1966, Category No. 11 (May 1990).
11. Olds, J. R., “The Suitability of Selected Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Techniques to Conceptual Aerospace Vehicle Design,” AIAA-92-4791 (September 1992).
12. D.C. Montgomery; Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley and Sons, N.J., 1991.
13. R.H. Myers; Response Surface Methodology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Allyn and Bacon Inc., Boston Mass., 1971.
14. A.I. Khuri and J.A. Cornell; Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1987.
15. D.O. Stanley, W.C. Engelund, R.A. Lepsch, M. McMillin, K.E. Wurster, R.W. Powell, A.A. Guinta, and R. Unal, “SSTO Configuration Selection and Vehicle Design,” AIAA-93-1053, February 1993.
16. Joyner, C. and J. Sabatella, “Launch Vehicle Propulsion Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology,” AIAA-90-2433 (July 1990).
17. Lucas, J.M., “Optimum Composite Designs,” Technometrics, Vol. 16, No. 4, (November 1974).
18. Mitchell, T.J., “An Algorithm for the Construction of ' D-Optimal' Experimental Designs,” Technometrics, Vol. 16, No. 2, (May 1974).
19. J.A. Craig, “D-Optimal Design Method: Final Report and User's Manual,” USAF Contract F33615-78- C-3011, FZM-6777, General Dynamics, Forth Worth Div.,1978.
20. M.J. Box and N.R. Draper, 1974, “On-Mimimum Point Second-Order Designs,” Technometrics, Vol. 16, No. 4, November.
21. R.C. St. John, 1975, “D-Optimality for Regression Designs: A Review,” Technometrics, Vol. 17, No. 1, February.
22. D.K. Lin, 1993, “Another Look at First-Order Saturated Designs: The P-Efficient Designs,” Technometrics, Vol. 35, No. 3, August.
23. R.A. Lepsch, D.O. Stanley and R. Unal; “Application of Dual-Fuel Propulsion to a Single Stage AMLS Vehicle,” AIAA-93-2275, June 1993.