Practical 3d aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured meshes

6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 1819-1828

  Elliott, Jonathan ^a   Peraire, Jaime ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINS (HEAT EXCHANGE); GEOMETRY; STRUTS; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT;

AIRCRAFT GEOMETRIES; ARBITRARY GEOMETRY; DISCRETE EQUATIONS; JET CONFIGURATION; LOCAL EXTREMUM DIMINISHING; RELAXATION ALGORITHM; UNSTRUCTURED GRID; UNSTRUCTURED MESHES;

WINGS;

EID: 84983119923     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-4170     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. AGARD. Computational Methods for Aerodynamic Design (Inverse) and Optimization. Report No. 463, 1989.
2. AGARD. Special Course on Inverse Methods for Airfoil Design for Aeronautical and Turbomachinery Applications. Report No. 780, 1990.
3. P. Arminjon and A. Dervieux. Construction of TVD- like artificial viscosities on 2-dimensional arbitrary FEM grids. INRIA Report 1111, 1989.
4. F. Beux and A. Dervieux. Exact-gradient shape optimization of a 2-D Euler flow. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 12:281-302, 1992.
5. J. Elliott and J. Perairc. Aerodynamic Design using Unstructured Meshes. AIAA, 96-1941, 1996.
6. J. K. Elliott. Aerodynamic Optimization based on the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations using Unstructured Grids. PhD thesis, Dept, of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT, 1997. To be published.
7. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. H. Wright, editors. Practical Optimization. Academic Press, 1981.
8. A. Iollo, G. Kuruvila, and S. Taasan., Pseudo-Time Method for Optimal Shape Design using the Euler Equations. Technical Report 95-59, ICASE, 1995.
9. A. Iollo and M. D. Salas. Contribution to the Optimal Shape Design of Two-Dimensional Internal Flows with Embedded Shocks. Technical Report 95-28, ICASE, 1995.
10. A. Jameson. Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 3:233-260, 1988.
11. A. Jameson. Optimum Aerodynamic. Design via Boundary Control. Princeton University, MAE Report 1994.
12. J. C. Newman, A. Taylor, and G. Burgreen. An Unstructured Grid Approach to Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization Using the Euler Equations. AIAA, 95-1646, 1995.
13. J. Newman and A. Taylor., Three-dimensional Aerodynamic Shape Sensitivity Analysis and Design Optimization Using the Euler Equations on Unstructured Grids. AIAA, 96-2464, 1996.
14. J. Peiro, J. Peraire, O. Morgan, K Hassan, and N. Birch. The Numerical Simulation of flow about Installed Aero Engine Nacelles using a Finite Element Euler Solver on Unstructured Meshes. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, pages 224-232, 1992.
15. J. Peraire, K. Morgan, M. Vahdati, and J. Peiro. The Construction and Behaviour of Some Unstructured Grid Algorithms for Compressible Flows. In Proc. of the ICFD Conference on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 1992.
16. J. Peraire, J. Peiro, and K. Morgan. Finite Element Multigrid Solution of Euler Flows past Installed Aeroengines. Computational Mechanics, 11:433-451, 1993.
17. J. Reuther and A. Jameson. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wing and Wing-Body Configurations Using Control Theory. AIAA-95-0123, January 1995.
18. J. Reuther and A. Jameson. Supersonic Wing and Wing-Body Shape Optimization using an Adjoint Formulation. In CFD for Design and Optimization: ASME International Mech Eng Congress and Exposition, November 1995.
19. P. Roe. Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 43:357-372, 1981.
20. G. Shubin and P. Frank. A Comparison of Two Closely- Related Approaches to Aerodynamic Design Optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Inverse Design Concepts and Optimization in Engineering Sciences, October 1991.
21. B. van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative scheme: a second order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32:101-136, 1979.