Response surface approximations for pitching moment including pitch-up in the MDO design of an HSCT

6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 1308-1322

  Crisafulli, Paul ^a,c   Kaufman, Matthew ^a,c   Giunta, Anthony A ^a,c   Mason, William H ^a,c   Grossman, Bernard ^a,c   Watson, Layne T ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

^c State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; DESIGN; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WINGS;

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; ESTIMATION METHODS; HIGH SPEED CIVIL TRANSPORTS; NON-LINEAR AERODYNAMICS; OPTIMIZATION STUDIES; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS;

PLANFORMS;

EID: 84983103273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-4136     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. McCullers, L. A., “Aircraft Configuration Op-timization Including Optimized Flight Profiles,” Proceedings of a Symposium on Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, J. Sobieski, compiler, NASA CP-2327, Apr. 1984, pp. 395-412.
2. Jayaram, S., Myklebust, A., and Gelhausen, P., “ACSYNT - A Standards-Based System for Parametric, Computer Aided Conceptual Design of Aircraft,” AIAA Paper 92-1268, Feb. 1992.
3. Hutchison, M. G., Unger, E. R., Mason, W. H., Grossman, B., and Haftka, R. T., “Variable- Complexity Aerodynamic Optimization of an HSCT Wing Using Structural Wing-Weight Equations,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1994, pp. 110-116.
4. Dudley, J., Huang, X., Haftka, R. T., Grossman, B., and Mason, W. H., “Variable-Complcxity Interlacing of Weight Equation and Structural Optimization for the Design of the High Speed Civil Transport,” AIAA Paper 94-4377, 1994.
5. Kaufman, M., Balabanov, V., Burgee, S., Gi- unta, A. A., Grossman, B., Mason, W. H., Watson, L. T., and Haftka, R. T., “Variable-Complexity Response Surface Approximations for Wing Structural Weight in HSCT Design,” 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 96-0089, Reno, NV, Jan. 1996.
6. Giunta, A. A., Narducci, R., Burgee, S., Grossman, B., Mason, W. H., Watson, L. T., and Haftka, R. T., “Variable-Complexity Response Surface Aerodynamic Design of an HSCT Wing,” Proceedings of the 13th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 95-1886, pp. 994-1002, San Diego, CA, June 19-22, 1995.
7. Benoliel, A. M. and Mason, W. IT., “Pitch-up Characteristics for HSCT Class Planforms: Survey and Estimation,” AIAA 12th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 94-1819, Colorado Springs, CO, June 1994.
8. MacMillin, P. E., Golividov, O., Mason, W.H. Grossman, B., and Haftka, R.T., “Trim, Control, and Performance Effects in Variable-Complexity High-Speed Civil Transport Design,” MAD Center Report 96-07-01, July 1996. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA: http://www.aoe.vt.edu/mad/reports
9. Grandhi, R. V., Thareja, R., and Haftka, R. T., “NEWSUMT-A: A General Purpose Program for Constrained Optimization Using Approximations,” ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, Vol. 107, 1985, pp. 94-99.
10. Hutchison, M. G., Multidisciplinary Optimization of High-Speed Civil Transport Configurations Using Variable-Complexity Modeling. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, Mar. 1993.
11. Hoak, D. E., et al., USAF Stability and Control DATCOM. Flight Control Division, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio, 45433-00001, 1978. Revised.
12. Antani, D. L. and Morgenstern, J. M., “HSCT High-Lift Aerodynamic Technology Requirements,” AIAA Paper 92-4228, Aug. 1992.
13. Kay, J., Mason, W. H., Durham, W., and Lutze, F., “Control Authority Assessment in Aircraft Conceptual Design,” AIAA Paper 93-3968, Aug. 1993.
14. Baber, Jr., H. T., “Characteristics of the Advanced Supersonic Technology AST-105-1 Configured for Transpacific Range with Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Variable Stream Control Engines,” NASA TM-78818, March 1979.
15. Wright, B.R., Bruckman, F., and Radovich, N.A., “Arrow Wings for Supersonic Cruise Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 829-836, December 3, 1978.
16. Carlson, H. W., Darden, C. M., and Mann, M. J., “Validation of a Computer Code for Analysis of Subsonic Aerodynamic Performance of Wings With Flaps in Combination With a Canard or Horizontal Tail and an Application to Optimization,” NASA TP-2961, 1990.
17. Yip, Long P. and Lysle P. Parlett. “Low-Speed Wind-Tunnel Tests of a 1/10-Scale Model of an Arrow-Wing Supersonic Cruise Configuration Designed for Cruise at Mach 2.2,” NASA TM-80152, 1979.
18. Quinto, P. F. and John W. P., “Flap Effectiveness on Subsonic Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Modified Arrow Wing,” NASA TM- 84582,1983.
19. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C., Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
20. Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., and Hess, J. L., Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N. Y., 1989, pp. 215-221.
21. Box, M. J. and Draper, N. R., “Factorial Designs, the | XTX | Criterion, and Some Related Matters,” Technometrics, Vol. 2, No. 4, Nov., 1960, pp. 455-475.
22. Giunta, A. A., Dudley, J. M., Narducci, R., Grossman, B., Haftka, R. T., Mason, W. H., and Watson, L. T., “Noisy Aerodynamic Response and Smooth Approximations in HSCT Design,” Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA Paper 94-4376, Panama City Beach, FL, Sept. 1994, pp. 1117-1128.