Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 139, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1967-1974

  Häberle, Lothar ^a   Fasching, Peter A ^a,b   Brehm, Barbara ^a   Heusinger, Katharina ^a   Jud, Sebastian M ^a   Loehberg, Christian R ^a   Hack, Carolin C ^a   Preuss, Caroline ^a   Lux, Michael P ^a   Hartmann, Arndt ^a   Vachon, Celine M ^c   Meier Meitinger, Martina ^a   Uder, Michael ^a   Beckmann, Matthias W ^a   Schulz Wendtland, Rüdiger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

mammographic density; mammography screening; masking; risk prediction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERCENTAGE MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84983087211     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30261     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Katalinic A. Epidemiology of breast cancer—current figures and trends. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73:130–5.
2. Katalinic A, Waldmann A. Breast cancer diagnosed early and safe—almost always cured? Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2012; 72:278–80.
3. Beckmann MW, Brucker C, Hanf V, et al. Quality assured health care in certified breast centers and improvement of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Onkologie 2011; 34:362–7.
4. Kolberg HC, Luftner D, Lux MP, et al. Breast cancer 2012—new aspects. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2012; 72:602–15.
5. Luftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, et al. Advances in breast cancer—looking back over the year. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2012; 72:1117–29.
6. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:347–60.
7. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299:2151–63.
8. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225:165–75.
9. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1081–7.
10. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:227–36.
11. Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Haeberle L, et al. Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a German case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2011; 20:1–8.
12. Rauh C, Hack CC, Haberle L, et al. Percent mammographic density and dense area as risk factors for breast cancer. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2012; 72:727–33.
13. Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, et al. Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers: results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer 2012; 131:2643–9.
14. Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, et al. Association of mammographic density with the proliferation marker Ki-67 in a cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 135:885–92.
15. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103:1–11.
16. Ursin G, Astrahan MA, Salane M, et al. The detection of changes in mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 1998; 7:43–7.
17. Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Pollock BG. Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988; 80:1198–202.
18. Hosmer DW. Lemeshow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression-model. Commun Stat A Theor 1980; 9:1043–69.