Subfunctionalization of cation/proton antiporter 1 genes in grapevine in response to salt stress in different organs

Horticulture Research

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Ma, Yuanchun ^a   Wang, Jiaoyang ^a   Zhong, Yan ^a   Geng, Fang ^a   Cramer, Grant R ^b   Cheng, Zong Ming Max ^a,c  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983018167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20527276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2015.31     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Cramer G, Urano K, Delrot S et al. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 2011; 11: 1-14.
2. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003; 218: 1-14.
3. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008; 59: 651-681.
4. Zhu JK. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6: 441-445.
5. Hasegawa PM. Sodium (Na1) homeostasis and salt tolerance of plants. Environ Exp Bot 2013; 92: 19-31.
6. Tester M, Davenport R. Na1tolerance and Na1transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 2003; 91: 503-527.
7. Bassil E, Blumwald E. The ins and outs of intracellular ion homeostasis: NHX-type cation/H1 transporters. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014; 22: 1-6.
8. Maser P, Thomine S, Schroeder JI et al. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2001; 126: 1646-1667.
9. Brett CL, Donowitz M, Rao R. Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005; 288: C223-C239.
10. Fujisawa M, Ito M, Krulwich TA. Three two-component transporters with channellike properties have monovalent cation/proton antiport activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 13289-13294.
11. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH et al. Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res 2003; 81: 179-192.
12. Bouby L, Figueiral I, Bouchette A et al. Bioarchaeological insights into the process of domestication of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman times in Southern France. PLoS One 2013; 8: E63195.
13. Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR et al. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour inter-relationships. Aust J Grape Wine Res 2002; 8: 3-14.
14. Shani U, Waisel Y, Eshel A et al. Responses to salinity of grapevine plants with split root systems. New Phytol 1993; 124: 695-701.
15. Hawker JS, Walker RR. The effect of sodium chloride on the growth and fruiting of Cabernet Sauvignon vines. Am J Enol Viticult 1978; 29: 172-176.
16. GilM, Esteruelas M, Gonzá lez E et al. Effect of two different treatments for reducing grape yield in Vitis vinifera cv Syrah on wine composition and quality: Berry thinning versus cluster thinning. J Agr Food Chem 2013; 61: 4968-4978.
17. Antcliff AJ, Newman RP, Barrett HC. Variation in chloride accumulation in some American species of grapevine. Vitis 1983; 22: 357-362.
18. Oki LR, Lieth JH. Effect of changes in substrate salinity on the elongation of Rosa hybrida L. 'Kardinal' stems. Sci Hortic 2004; 101: 103-119.
19. Hopper DW, Ghan R, Cramer, GR. A rapid dehydration leaf assay reveals stomatal response differences in grapevine genotypes. Hort Res 2014; 1: 2.
20. Hanana M, Cagnac O, Yamaguchi T et al. A grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) cation/proton antiporter is associated with berry ripening. Plant Cell Physiol 2007; 48: 804-811.
21. Chanroj S, Wang G, Venema K et al. Conserved and diversified gene families of monovalent cation/h(1) antiporters from algae to flowering plants. Front Plant Sci 2012; 3: 25.
22. Ma Y, Wang J, Zhong Y, Grant RC et al. Genome-wide analysis of the cation/ proton antiporter (CPA) super family genes in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Omics J 2015; 8: 300-311.
23. Epstein E. Mineral nutrition of plants: Principles and perspectives. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1972: 325-344.
24. Blum A, Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 1981; 21: 43-47.
25. Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann Bot 1996; 78: 389-398.
26. Flint HL, Boyce BR, Beattie DJ. Index of injury - A useful expression of freezing injury to plant tissues as determined by the electrolytic method. Can J Plant Sci 1967; 47: 229-230.
27. Schmidt AC, Reisser W, Mattusch J, Popp P, Wennrich R. Evaluation of extraction procedures for the ion chromatographic determination of arsenic species in plant materials. J Chromatogr A 2000; 889: 83-91.
28. Krachler M, Mohl C, Emons H et al. Influence of digestion procedures on the determination of rare earth elements in peat and plant samples by USN-ICP-MS. J Anal Atom Spectrom 2002; 17: 844-851.
29. Krupp E, Milne B, Mestrot A et al. Investigation into mercury bound to biothiols: Structural identification using ESI-ion-trap MS and introduction of a method for their HPLC separation with simultaneous detection by ICP-MS and ESI-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 2008; 390: 1753-1764.
30. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1993; 11: 113-116.
31. Gonzalez-Mendoza D, Moreno AQ, Zapata-Perez O. An improved method for the isolation of total RNA from Avicennia germinans leaves. Z Naturforsch C 2008; 63: 124-126.
32. Wang M, Vannozzi A, Wang G, et al. Genome and transcriptome analysis of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family. Hort Res 2014; 1: 14016.
33. Reid KE, Olsson N, Schlosser J et al. An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development. BMC Plant Biol 2006; 6: 27.
34. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001; 25: 402-408.
35. Galvez FJ, Baghour M, Hao G et al. Expression of LeNHX isoforms in response to salt stress in salt sensitive and salt tolerant tomato species. Plant Physiol Biochem 2012; 51: 109-115.
36. Ye CY, Zhang HC, Chen JH et al. Molecular characterization of putative vacuolar NHX-type Na1/H1 exchanger genes from the salt-resistant tree Populus euphratica. Physiol Plant 2009; 137: 166-174.
37. Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Tagiri A et al. Function, intracellular localization and the importance in salt tolerance of a vacuolar Na1/H1 antiporter from rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45: 146-159.
38. Xia T, Apse MP, Aharon GS, Blumwald E. Identification and characterization of a NaCl-inducible vacuolar Na1/H1 antiporter in Beta vulgaris. Physiol Plant 2002; 116: 206-212.
39. Zö rb C, Noll A, Karl S et al. Molecular characterization of Na1/H1 antiporters (ZmNHX) of maize (Zea mays L.) and their expression under salt stress. J Plant Physiol 2005; 162: 55-66.
40. Cramer G, Ergü l A, Grimplet J et al. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: Early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 2007; 7: 111-134.
41. Pardo JM, Cubero B, Leidi EO et al. Alkali cation exchangers: Roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 2006; 57: 1181-1199.
42. Kramer D, Läuchli A, Yeo AR et al. Transfer cells in roots of Phaseolus coccineus: Ultrastructure and possible function in exclusion of sodium from the shoot. Ann Bot 1977; 41: 1031-1040.
43. Yeo AR, Kramer D, Liuchli A et al. Ion distribution in salt-stressed mature Zea mays roots in relation to ultrastructure and retention of sodium. J Exp Bot 1977; 28: 17-29.