ADAM: The SI-TAL corpus of annotated dialogues

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 633-640

  Cattoni, Roldano ^a   Danieli, Morena ^b   Sandrini, Vanessa ^a   Soria, Claudia ^c  

^a ITC IRST   (Italy)

^b Gruppo Torinese Trasporti   (Italy)

^c CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; REUSABILITY; SEMANTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORKS; DESIGN AND APPLICATION; LINGUISTIC INFORMATION; NATIONAL PROJECTS; ORTHOGRAPHIC TRANSCRIPTION; POS TAGGING; RESEARCH PURPOSE;

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EID: 84983008775     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Baggia, P., Castagneri, G. and M. Danieli (2000). Field trials of the Italian ARISE train timetable system. Speech Communication, 31, 355-367.
2. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The Kappa statistics. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
3. Cattoni, R., and E. Franconi. (1990). Walking through the semantics of frame-based description languages: A case study. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium ISMIS '90, Knoxville, TN, pp. 234-241.
4. Core, M., and J. Allen. (1997). Coding dialogues with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Actions in Humans and Machines, Cambridge, MA, pp. 28-35.
5. De Rose, S., Maler E., Orchard D., and B. Trafford. (2000). XML linking language (Xlink). W3C Working Draft, 21 February 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/.
6. Di Eugenio B., Jordan P., Moore J.D., and R. Thomason. (1998). An empirical investigation of proposals in collaborative dialogues. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada, pp. 325- 329.
7. Dybkjaer, L., Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjaer H., McKelvie D., and A. Mengel. (1998). The MATE markup framework. MATE Deliverable 1.2. http://mate.nis.sdu.dk.
8. Gibbon, D. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of standards and resources for spoken language systems. First supplement, EAGLES LE3-4244, Spoken Language Working Group.
9. Ide, N., and C. Brew. (2000). Requirements, tools, and architectures for annotated corpora. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Architecture and Software Support for Large Corpora, LREC 2000, Athens, Greece, pp. 1-5.
10. Isard, A., and J. Carletta. (1995). Replicability of transaction and action coding in the Map Task corpus. In M. Walker, J.D. Moore (Eds.), AAAI Spring Symposium: Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation. Stanford, CA, pp. 60- 66.
11. Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, E. and D. Briasca. (1997). Switchboard DAMSL labeling project coder's manual. Technical Report 97-02, University of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science, Boulder.
12. Reithinger, N. (1999). Robust information extraction in a speech translation system. In Proceedings of Eurospeech '99, Budapest, pp. 2427-2430.
13. Siegel, S. and N.J. Castellan. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Silverman, K., Beckman M., Pitrelli J., Ostendorf M., Wightam C, Price P., Pierrehumbert J., and J. Hirschberg. (1992). TOBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Proceedings of ICSLP 1992, pp. 867-870.
15. Soria, C., Cattoni R., and M. Danieli. (2000). ADAM: An architecture for xml-based dialogue annotation on multiple levels In Dybkjaer L, Hasida K, Traum D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First SIGDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, pp. 9-18.
16. Stalnaker, R.C. (1970). Pragmatics. Synthese, 22, 272- 289.
17. Waibel, A. (1996). Interactive translation of conversational speech. Computer, 29(7), 41-48.