On CASE tool usage at Nokia

Proceedings - ASE 2002: 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 59-68

  Maccari, A ^a   Riva, C ^a   Maccari, F ^b  

^a NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; POPULATION STATISTICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SURVEYS;

CODE GENERATION; DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE; DOCUMENT GENERATION; INDUSTRY NEEDS; STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSIS; TOOL USAGES; VERSION MANAGEMENT;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 84982994852     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2002.1114995     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. st Edition, Collins, 1972.
2. N. Fenton, S. Lawrence Pfleger, R. L. Glass, Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers, IEEE Software, July 1994, pp. 86-95.
3. R. L. Glass, The realities of software technology - Payoffs, Communications of the ACM, February 1999.
4. E. Hendrickson, Evaluating CASE tools, Software Testing & Quality Engineering, January/February 1999, p. 38-42.
5. P. G. Hoel, Elementary statistics, in Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics, John Wiley and Sons, 1966.
6. J. Iivari, J. Maansaari, The usage of systems development: why are we stuck to old practices?, Information and Software Technology 40 (1998), p. 501-510, Elsevier Science, 1998.
7. E. L. Lehmann, Significance level and power, in O. F. Hamouda and J. C. R. Rowley, Foundations of probability, econometrics and economic games, p. 29-38, Cheltenam: Elgar, 1997.
8. H. R. Lindman, Analysis of variance in experimental design, in Springer text in statistics, Springer, 1992.
9. A. Maccari, C. Riva, Empirical evaluation of CASE tool usage at Nokia, Fourth International Conference on Empirical Assessment & Evaluation in Software Engineering, Keele, UK, April 2000, accepted for publication on the International Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, Kluwer academic Publishers, December 2000.
10. J. Mac Queen, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, in L. M. Le Cam and J. Neyman, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. I: Statistics, p. 281-297, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967.
11. [ObjecTime]: see http://www.objectime.com/
12. W. J. Orlikowski, CASE tools as organizational change investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development, Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 17 n. 3, September 1993.
13. G. Post, A. Kagan, R. T. Keim, A comparative evaluation of CASE tools, The Journal of Systems and Software 44 (1998), p. 87-96, Elsevier Science, 1998.
14. [Prosa]: see http://www.insoft.fi/
15. [QLM]: see http://www.qualiware.com/
16. [RationalRose]: see http://www.rational.com/
17. [Rhapsody]: see http://www.ilogix.com/
18. H. Scheffé, The analysis of variance, in Wiley Publications in statistics, John Wiley and Sons, 1967.
19. S. Siegel, N. J. Castellan, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
20. M. Wood, J. Daly, J. Miller, M. Roper, Multi-method research: an empirical investigation of object-oriented technology, The Journal of Systems and Software 48 (1999), 13-26.