Dependence management for dynamic reconfiguration of component-based distributed systems

Proceedings - ASE 2002: 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 279-284

  Chen, Xuejun ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dependence Management; Dynamic Dependency; Dynamic Reconfiguration; Nested Invocations; Static Dependency

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPONENT BASED; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC DEPENDENCY; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; NESTED INVOCATIONS; RECONFIGURABLE; STATIC DEPENDENCIES; WIRED AND WIRELESS;

RECONFIGURABLE HARDWARE;

EID: 84982937977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2002.1115030     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bacon, D.F., Graham, S.L., and Sharp, O.J. Compiler Transformations for High-Performance Computing. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(4), pages 345-420, December 1994.
2. Bidan, Ch., Issarny, V., Saridakis, T., and Zarras, A. A Dynamic Reconfiguration Service for CORBA. In: Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 35-42, Maryland, 1998.
3. nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2002), pages 401-408, Vienna, Austria, 2002.
4. Cheng, J. Slicing Concurrent Programs - A Graph- Theoretical Approach. In Automated and Algorithmic Debugging, number 749 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 223-240, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
5. Ferrante, J., Ottenstein, K.J., and Warren, J.D. The Program Dependence Graph and its Use in Optimization. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 9(3), 319-349, October 1987.
6. Goodwin, D.W. Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis in an Executable Optimizer. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '97 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 122-133, ACM SIGPLAN, June 1997.
7. Harrold, M.J., Rothermel, G., and Sinha, S. Computation of Interprocedural Control Dependence. In Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA '98), pages 11-20, ACM SIGSOFT, March 1998.
8. Harrold, M.J. and Soffa, M.L. Efficient Computation of Interprocedural Definition-Use Chains. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 16(2), 175-204, March 1994.
9. Hatcliff, J., Corbett, J.C., Dwyer, M.B., Sokolowski, S., and Zheng, H. A Formal Study of Slicing for Multi-threaded Programs with JVM Concurrency Primitives. In Proceedings of the Static Analysis Symposium, 1-18, 1999.
10. Kon, F. Automatic Configuration of Component-based Distributed Systems. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000.
11. Kramer, J. and Magee, J. The Evolving Philosophers Problem: Dynamic Change Management. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-16, 11, pages 1293-1306, 1990.
12. Microsoft, COM, http://www.microsoft.com/com.
13. Milojicic, D. Middleware's role, today and tomorrow. IEEE Concurrency, pages 70-80, April-June 1999.
14. OMG. CORBA Component Model RFP, Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org, 2001.
15. OSGi: Open Services Gateway Initiative. http://www.osgi.org, 2001.
16. Oueichek, I. and Rousset de P., S. Dynamic Configuration Management in the Guide Object-Oriented Distributed System. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 28-35, Maryland, 1996
17. Podgurski, A. and Clarke, L.A.. A Formal Model of Program Dependences and its Implications for Software Testing, Debugging, and Maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(9), 965-979, September 1990.
18. Stafford, J. A. and Wolf, A. L. Architecture-Level Dependence Analysis for Software Systems. University of Colorado, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report CU-CS-913-00, December 2000.
19. Sun Microsystems. Enterprise JavaBeans, http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/index.html, 1999.
20. Szyperski, C. Component Software - Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley / ACM Press, 1998.
21. Warren, I. and Sommerville, I. A Model for Dynamic Configuration which Preserves Application Integrity. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pages 28-35, Maryland, 1996.