Combining and adapting software quality predictive models by genetic algorithms

Proceedings - ASE 2002: 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 285-288

  Azar, D ^a   Precup, D ^a   Bouktif, S ^b   Kegl B ^b   Sahraoui, H ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

DIRECT MEASURES; NON-TRIVIAL; PREDICTIVE MODELS; QUALITY FACTORS; QUALITY MODELING; QUALITY MODELS; SOFTWARE QUALITY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84982920811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2002.1115031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. L. Briand, P. Devanbu, and W. Melo. An investigation into coupling measures for C++. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1997.
2. L. Briand, J. Wüst, J. W. Daly, and V. Porter. Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality in object-oriented systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 51:245-273, 2000.
3. S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer. A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, 20(6):476-493, 1994.
4. E. Falkenauer. Genetic Algorithms and Grouping Problems. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
5. J. H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, 1975.
6. J. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
7. W. J. Youden. How to evaluate accuracy. Materials Research and Standards, ASTM, 1961.
8. H. Zuse. A Framework of Software Measurement. Walter de Gruyter, 1998.