Well-being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed, southern Chile

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 81-91

  Delgado, Luisa E ^a,b   Marín, Víctor H ^b  

^a Fundación CTF Padre Mariano 391   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Environmentalist's paradox; Human well being; Rural population; South America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982851896     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Palmer Fry, B., Homewood, K., Mourato, S., Rowcliffe, J.M., Wallace, G., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Assessing the relationship between well-being and ecosystem services: a review of frameworks. Conserv. Soc. 12 (2014), 437–449.
2. Aguado, M., Calvo, D., Dessal, C., Riechmann, J., González, J.A., Montes, C., 2012. La necesidad de repensar el bienestar humano en un mundo cambiante. PAPELES de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global. No. 119, pp. 49–76.
3. Agüero, B., Análisis temporal de los cambios en el uso del suelo en la sub-cuenca del Humedal del Río Cruces, Valdivia. 2014, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago (Seminario de Título para optar al Título de Biólogo con mención en Medio Ambiente).
4. Asah, S.T., Guerry, A.D., Blahna, D.J., Lawler, J.J., Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosyst. Serv. 10 (2014), 180–186.
5. Balvanera, P., Los servicios ecosistémicos que ofrecen los bosques tropicales. Ecosistemas 21 (2012), 136–147.
6. Balvanera, P., Uriartec, M., Almeida-Leñerod, L., Altesore, A., DeClerckf, F., Gardnerg, T., Hallh, J., Lara, A., Laterrak, P., Peña-Claros, M., Silva Matos, D.M., Vogl, A.L., Romero-Duque, L.P., Arreola, L.F., Caro-Borrero, Á.P., Gallego, F., Jain, M., Little, C., de Oliveira Xavier, R., Paruelo, J.M., Peinado, J.E., Poorter, L., Ascarrunz, N., Correa, F., Cunha-Santino, M.B., Hernández-Sánchez, A.P., Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst. Serv. 2 (2012), 56–70.
7. Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A.B., Buchmann, N., He, J.S., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9 (2006), 1146–1156.
8. Bennett, E.M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B.N., Geijzendorffer, I.R., Krug, C.B., Lavorel, S., Lazoz, E., Lebel, L., Martín-López, B., Meyfroidt, P., Mooney, H.A., Nel, J.L., Pascual, U., Payet, K., Pérez Harguindeguy, N., Peterson, G.D., Prieur-Ricahrd, A.-H., Reyers, B., Roebeling, P., Seppelt, R., Solan, M., Tschakert, P., Tscharntke, T., Turner, B.L. II, Verburg, P.H., Viglizzo, E.F., White, P. Cl, Woorward, G., Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 76–85.
9. Berdegué, J., Jara, E., Modrego, F., Sanclemente, X., Schejtman, A., 2010. “Comunas Rurales de Chile”. Documento de Trabajo N° 60. Programa Dinámicas Territoriales Rurales. Rimisp, Santiago, Chile. 43p.
10. Binder, C.R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P.W.G., Pahl-Wostl, C., Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 18(4), 2013, 26, 10.5751/ES-05551-180426.
11. Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFriese, R., Diáz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A., Oteng-Yeboahi, A., Miguel Pereira, H., Perrings, C., Reid, W., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R., Whyte, A., Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), 305–1312.
12. CASEN, 2014. Encuesta CASEN (Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional). Observatorio Social. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. Gobierno de Chile. 〈 http://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/casen_obj.php〉.
13. Censo, 2002. Censo 2002 Síntesis de resultados. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. 〈 http://www.ine.cl/cd2002/sintesiscensal.pdf〉.
14. CONAF, 2011. Catastro de los recursos vegetacionales nativos de Chile. Monitoreo de cambios y actualizaciones periodo 1997–2011. Corporación Nacional Forestal, Santiago de Chile. 28 pp.
15. Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Poleg, S., Anderson, Sh.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R.K., Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26 (2014), 152–158.
16. Costanza, R., Fischer, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliot, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., Glenn, L.M., Hudspeth, Th, Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S.A. Turab, Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, Th, Snapp, R., Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecol. Econ. 61 (2007), 267–276.
17. De Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L.C., ten Brink, P., van Beukering, P., Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst. Serv. 1 (2012), 50–61.
18. De Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L., Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decisión making. Ecol. Complex. 7 (2010), 260–272.
19. Delgado, L.E., Marín, V.H., Ecosystem services: where on earth?. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 24–26.
20. Delgado, L.E., Torres-Gómez, M., Tironi-Silva, A., Marín, V.H., Estrategia de adaptación local al cambio climático para el acceso equitativo al agua en zonas rurales de Chile. Am. Lat. Hoy 69 (2015), 113–137.
21. Delgado, L.E., Tironi, A., Vila, I., Verardi, G., Ibañez, C., Agüero, B., Marín, V.H., El humedal del Río Cruces, Valdivia, Chile: una síntesis ecosistémica. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res 42 (2014), 937–949.
22. Delgado, L.E., Sepúlveda, Ma.B., Marín, V.H., Provision of ecosystem services by the Aysén watershed, Chilean Patagonia, to rural households. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2013), 102–109.
23. Delgado, L.E., Tironi, A., Vila, I., Verardi, G., Ibañez, C., Agüero, N., Marín, V.H., El Humedal del Río Cruces, Valdivia, Chile: una síntesis ecosistémica. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 42 (2014), 937–949.
24. Duraiappah, A.K., Ecosystem services and human weel-being: do global findings make any sense?. Bioscience 61 (2011), 7–8.
25. Duraiappah, A.K., Asah, S.T., Brondizio, E.S., Kosoy, N., O'Farrell, P.J., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Subramanian, S.M., Takeuchi, K., Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the new commons. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7 (2014), 94–100.
26. Fisher, J.A., Patenaude, G., Meir, P., Nightingale, A.J., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Williams, M., Woodhouse, I.H., Strengthening conceptual foundations: analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research. Glob. Environ. Change 23 (2013), 1098–1111.
27. Fulford, R.S., Smith, L.S., Harwell, M., Dantin, D., Russell, M., Human well-being differs by community type: toward reference points in a human well-being indicator useful for decisión support. Ecol. Indic. 56 (2015), 194–204.
28. Gardner R.C., Barchiesi, S., Beltrame, C., Finlayson, C.M., Galewski, T., Harrison, I., Paganini, M., Perennou, C., Pritchard, D.E., Rosenqvist, A., Walpole, M., 2015. State of the World's Wetlands and their Services to People: A Compilation of Recent Analyses. Ramsar Briefing Note no. 7. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
29. Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V.N., Woolcock, M., 2004. Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire. World Bank Working Paper No. 18.
30. Häyhä, T., Franzese, P.-P.-, Paletto, A., Fath, B.D., Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 12–23.
31. Hobbs, R.J., Higgs, E.S., Hall, C.M., Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New ecological World Order. 2013, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., UK.
32. Holling, C.S., Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4 (2001), 390–405.
33. Hou, Y., Zhou, S., Burkhard, B., Müller, F., Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 490 (2014), 1012–1028.
34. Howe, C., Suich, H., Vira, B., Mace, G.M., Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob. Environ. Change 28 (2014), 263–275, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005.
35. Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P.A., Montes, C., Martín-López, B., Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 108 (2014), 36–48, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
36. Isbell, F., Calcagno, V., Hector, A., Connolly, J., Harpole, W.S., Reich, P.B., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Tilman, D., van Ruijven, J., Weigelt, A., Wilsey, B.J., Zavaleta, E.S., Loreau, M., High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477 (2011), 199–202.
37. Jordan, S.J., Hayes, S.E., Yoskowitz, D., Smith, L.M., Summers, J.K., Russell, M., Benson, W.H., Accounting for natural resources and environment sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010), 1530–1536.
38. King, M.F., Reno, V.F., Evlyn, M.L., Novo, M., The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: a literature review. Soc. Indic. Res. 116 (2014), 681–698.
39. Lakerveld, R.P., Lele, S., Crane, T.A., Fortuin, K.P.J., Springate-Baginski, O., The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosyst. Serv. 14 (2015), 56–66, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.001.
40. Lebel, L., Wattana, S., Talerngsri, P., Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and créate demand for coproductive capacity. Ecol. Soc., 20(1), 2015, 12, 10.5751/ES-06527-200112.
41. Marín, V.H., Delgado, L.E., Vila, I., Tironi, A., Barrera, V., Ibañez, C., Regime shifts of Cruces River wetland ecosystem: current conditions, future uncertainties. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res 42 (2014), 160–171.
42. Marín, V.H., Rodriguez, L.C., Niemeyer, H.M., A socio-ecological Model of the Opuntia Scrublands in the Peruvian Andes. Ecol. Model. 227 (2012), 136–146.
43. Marín, V., Delgado, L., Vila, I., Sistemas acuáticos, ecosistemas y cuencas hidrográficas. En. Vila, I., Veloso, A., Schlatter y, R., Ramirez, C., (eds.) Macrófitas y vertebrados de los sistemas límnicos de Chile, 2006, Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile.
44. McGinnis, M.D., Ostrom, E., Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol. Soc., 19(2), 2014, 30, 10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
45. MEA, 2005a. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report. In: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
46. MEA, 2005b. Framework Reports: Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing, Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, In: 〈http://www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx〉.
47. Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H., Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1202–1208.
48. Nelson, G.C., Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: better data, better accounting, and better technology will help. Bioscience 61 (2011), 9–10.
49. Norgaard, R.B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1219–1227.
50. OECD, 2011. OECD better life initiative. Compendium of OECD Well-Being Indicators. 〈 http://www.oecd.org/std/4717288.pdf〉.
51. Opazo, K.N., 2014. Aplicación del modelo del ciclo adaptativo de Holling a los sistemas socio-ecológicos de la sub-cuenca del Humedal del Río Cruces. Seminario de Título para optar al Título de Biólogo con mención en Medio Ambiente. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
52. Ostrom, E., A genral framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325 (2009), 419–422.
53. Paquette, A., Messier, C., The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20 (2011), 170–180.
54. Pereira, E., Queiroz, C., Pereira, H., Vicente, L., Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecol. Soc., 10(2), 2005, 14 Online URL: 〈 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/〉.
55. Quijas, S., Schmid, B., Balvanera, P., Plant diversity enhances provision of ecosystem services: a new synthesis. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11 (2010), 582–593.
56. Quintas-Soriano, C., Castro, A.J., Castro, H., García-Llorente, M., Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy 54 (2016), 534–548, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.011.
57. Rapport, D.J., Costanza, R., McMichael, A.J., Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 (1998), 397–402.
58. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Tengö, M., Bennett, E.M., Holland, T., Benessaiah, K., MacDonald, G.K., Pfeifer, L., Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. Bioscience 60 (2010), 576–589.
59. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Tengö, M., Bennett, E.M., The paradox persists: how to resolve it?. Bioscience 61 (2011), 11–12.
60. Sandhu, H., Sandhu, S., Linking ecosystem services with the constituents of human well-being for poverty alleviation in eastern Himalayas. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 65–75.
61. Sandifer, P.A., Sutton-Grier, A.E., Ward, B.P., Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services and human health and well-being: opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 1–15.
62. Schlu¨ter, M., Hinkel, J., Bots, P.W.G., Arlinghaus, R., Application of the SES framework for model-based analysis of the dynamics of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 19(1), 2014, 36, 10.5751/ES-05782-190136.
63. Sen, A., Desarrollo y Libertad. 2009, Planeta, Bogotá.
64. Sepúlveda, Ma.B., 2010. Análisis de los servicios ecosistémicos de la cuenca del Río Aysén: selección de metodologías de valoración económica y pago de servicios ambientales (PAS). Memoria de Título, Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
65. Schuhmann, P.W., Mahon, R., The valuation of marine ecosystem goods and services in the Caribbean: a literature review and framework for future valuation efforts. Ecosyst. Serv. 11 (2015), 56–66.
66. Suich, H., Howe, C., Mace, G., Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a review. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 137–147.
67. Tansley, A.G., The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology 16 (1935), 284–307.
68. Torres-Gomez, M., 2012. Evaluación de Los instrumentos de gestión de recursos hidrícos amenazados por actividad silvagropecuaria. El caso de la cuenca de Río Cruces (Chile). Tesis de postgrado, Máster en Planificación y Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de Barcelona.
69. Torrejón, F., Cisternas, M., Impacto ambiental temprano en la Araucanía deducido de crónicas españolas y estudios historiográficos. BOSQUE 24:3 (2003), 45–55, 10.4067/S0717-92002003000300005.
70. Verardi, G., Aplicación de herramientas de sensoramiento remoto para la conservación y gestión del Humedal del río Cruces. Seminario de Título para optar al Título de Biólogo con mención en Medio Ambiente. 2013, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
71. Von Bernath, Z., Propuesta teórica de una estrategia de pago por servicios ecosistémicos (PSE) para el humedal del Río Cruces. Seminario de Título para optar al Título de Biólogo con mención en Medio Ambiente. 2013, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
72. Xu, Y., Tang, H., Wang, B., Chen, J., Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study in Huailai County. China Environ. Earth Sci., 75, 2016, 416, 10.1007/s12665-015-5103-2.