Application of probabilistic methods for the determination of an economically robust hsct configuration

6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 968-978

  Mavris, Dimitri N ^a   Bandtev, Oliver ^a   Schrage, Daniel P ^b  

^a Aerospace Systems Design Laboratory (ASDL)   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; SALES;

EVALUATION CRITERIA; HIGH SPEED CIVIL TRANSPORTS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC METHODS; STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH; UNCERTAINTY VARIABLES;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION;

EID: 84982318648     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-4090     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. 1 Mavris, D.N., Bandte, O., and Schrage, D.P., Economic Uncertainty Assessment of an HSCT Using a Combined Design of Experiments/ Monte Carlo Simulation Approach, 17th Annual Conference of the International Society of Parametric Analysts. San Diego, CA, June, 1995.
2. 2 Mavris, D.N., Bandte, O., and Brewer, J.T., Method for the Identification and Assessment Critical Technologies Needed for an Viable HSCT, 1 st AIAA Aircraft Technology and Operations Congress. Los Angeles, CA, September, 1995, AIAA 95-3887.
3. 3 Mavris, D.N., Bandte, O., and Schrage, D.P., Effect of Mission Requirements on the Economic Robustness of an HSCT, 18th Annual Conference of the International Society of Parametric Analysts. Cannes, France, June, 1996.
4. 5 DeLaurentis, D.A., Mavris, D.N., and Schrage, D.P., An IPPD Approach to the Preliminary Design Optimization of an HSCT using Design of Experiments, accepted at the 20th ICAS Congress. Sorrento, Italy, September, 1996.
5. 6 Box, G.E.P., Draper, N.R., Empirical Model- Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987.
6. 7 Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., Hunter, J.S., Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1978.
7. 8 Haaland, P.D., Experimental Design in Biotechnology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1989.
8. 9 Kusiak, A., Concurrent Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1993.
9. 10 Bras, B.A., and Mistree, F., Robust Design Using Compromise Decision Support Problems, Engineering Optimization, vol. 21, pp. 213-239, 1993.
10. 11 Roy, R., A Primer on the Taguchi Method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1990.
11. 12 Dieter, G.E., Engineering Design. A Materials and Processing Approach. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1991.
12. 13 DeLaurentis, D.A., Calise, A., Schrage, D.P., and Mavris, D.N., Integrating Guidance Optimization into Vehicle Design Via Singular Perturbation Theory and Statistical Methods, accepted at the 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Bellevue, WA, September, 1996.
13. 14 Kaufman, M., et al, Variable-Complexity Response Surface Approximations for Wing Structural Weight in HSCT Design, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, NV, January, 1996.
14. 15 Giunta, A.A., et al, Wing Design for a High-Speed Civil Transport Using a Design of Experiments Methodology, paper accepted at the 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Bellevue, WA, September, 1996
15. 16 Chen, W., et al., Integration of Response Surface Method with the Compromise Decision Support Problem in Developing a General Robust Design Procedure, Advances in Design Automation (Azarm. S.. et al. Eds.~). pp. 485-492. ASME DE-Vol. 82-2, ASME, New York, 1995
16. 17 Unal, R., Stanley, D.O., Joyner, C.R., Parameter Model Building and Design Optimization Using Response Surface Methods, Journal of Parametrics. Washington, DC, May, 1994
17. 18 McCullers, L.A., Flight Optimization System. Computer Program and Users Guide. Version 5.7. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, December 1994.
18. 19 Galloway, T.L., and Mavris, D.N., Aircraft Life Cycle Cost Analysis (ALCCA) Program. NASA Ames Research Center, September 1993.
19. 20 Decisioneering, Inc., Crystal Ball Computer Program and User’s Guide. Version 4.0. Aurora, CO, 1996
20. 21 Taguchi, G., Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes, Asian Productivity Organization, available in the USA from American Supplier Institute, Dearborn, MI, 1986
21. 22 Sakata, I.F. and Davis, G.W., Evaluation of Structural Design Concepts for Arrow-Wing Supersonic Cruise Aircraft, NASA CR-2667. May, 1977
22. 23 SAS Institute Inc., JMP Computer Program and User’s Manual. Cary, NC, 1994