An efficient Bi-CGSTAB algorithm to compute transonic turbulent flow past a supercritical airfoil

35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages

  Lin, Herng ^a   Chieng, Ching Chang ^b  

^a CHUNG SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; AIRFOILS; ALGORITHMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; TURBULENCE MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW;

CENTRAL DIFFERENCING; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; EXPLICIT OPERATORS; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; INCOMPLETE LU FACTORIZATIONS; LINEARIZED EQUATIONS; MULTI-GRID ALGORITHMS; SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOILS;

CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD;

EID: 84982318511     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Holst, T. L., “Viscous Transonic Airfoil Workshop Compendium of Results,” J. Aircraft, Vol. 25, № 12, December 1988.
2. Baldwin, B. S. and Earth, T. J., “A One-Equation Turbulence Transport Model for High Reynolds Number Wall-Bounded Flows,” AIAA Paper 91-0610, 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January,1991.
3. Goldberg, U. C. and Ramakrishnan, S. V, “A Pointwise Version of Baldwin-Barth Turbulence Model,” Comp. Fluid Dyn., 1993, Vol. 1, pp. 321-328.
4. Hestenes, M. R. and Stiefel, E, “Methods of Conjugate Gradients for Solving Linear Systems”, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Vol.49, pp. 409-436.
5. Fletcher, R., “Conjugate Grandient Methods for Indefinite Systems”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 506, Springer - Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 73-89, 1976.
6. Elman, H. C., “Iterative Methods for Large Sparse Nonsymmetric Systems of Linear Equations”, PH. D. thesis, Computer Science Dept. Yale Univ., New Haven. CT. 1982.
7. Saad, Y. and Schultz, M., “GMRES: A Generalized Minimum Residual Algorithm for Solving Nonsymrnetric Linear Systems” SIAM J. of Sci. and Statistical Computing, Vol. 7, № 3, 1986, pp. 856-869.
8. Wigton, L.B, Yu, N. J. and Young, D. P., “GMRES Accelaration of Computational Fluid Dynamic Codes,” AIAA Paper № 85-1494CP, AIAA 7th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Cincinnato, Ohio, July 1985.
9. Obayashi, S., “Numerical Simulation of Underexpandede Plumes Using Upwind Algorithms,” AIAA Paper № 88-4360, AIAA Atmospheric and Flight Mechanics Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Aug. 1988.
10. Venkatakrishnan, V., “Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Methods for the Compressible Navier Stokes Equations” AIAA J., Vol. 29, № 7, pp. 1092-1100, July 1991.
11. Ajmani, K. Wing-fai Ng, and Meng-Sing Liou, “Generalized Conjugate Gradient Methods for the Navier Stokes Equations” AIAA Paper № 91-1556
12. Sonneveld, P., “CGS, a Fast Lanczos type Solver for Nonsymmetric Linear Systems,” SIAM J. Sci. STAT. COMPUT., Vol. 10, № 1, pp. 36-52, Jan. 1989.
13. H. A. Van Der Vorst, “Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Convergent Varient of Bi-CG for the solution of Nonsymrnetric Linear Systems,” SIAM J. Sci. STAT. COMPUT., Vol.13, №2, pp. 631-644, March 1992.
14. Meijerink, T. A. and van der Vorst., H. A., “Guidelines for the usage of incomplete Decompositions in Solving Sets of Linear Equations as They Occur in Practical Problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.44, №1, 1981, pp. 134-155.
15. Jameson A. and Baker, T. J., “Multigrid Solution of the Euler Equations for Aircraft Configurations,” AIAA Paper № 84-0093, Jan. 1984.
16. Jameson, A. and Yoon, S., “Multigrid Solution of the Euler Equations Using Implicit Schemes,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 24, № 11, Nov. 1886, pp. 1737-1743.
17. Yee, H. C. and Harten, A., “Implicit TVD Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Curvilinear Coordinate,” AIAA Paper 85-1513.
18. MacCormack, R. W., “Current Status of Numerical Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA Paper 85-0032.
19. Coakley, T. J., “Turbulence Modeling Methods for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations,” AIAA Paper № 83-1693, AIAA 16th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, July 1983.
20. Sahu, J. and Danberg, J. E., “Navier-Stokes Computations of Transonic Flows with a Two-Equation Turbulence Model”. AIAA Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 1744-1751, 1986.
21. Van Leer, B. and Mulder, W. A., “Relaxation Methods for Hyperbolic Equations,” Delft Univ. of Technology, Deflt, The Netherlands, Rept. 84-20, 1984.
22. Chakravarthy, S. R., “Relaxation Methods for Unfactored Implicit Schemes,” AIAA Paper 84-0165.
23. Freund, R. W. and Nachtigal, N. M., “QMR: a Quasi-Minimal Residual Method for Non-Hermitian Linear Systems,” Numer. Math., Vol.60, NO.1, pp. 315-339, 1991.
24. Freund, R. W, “A Transpose-Free Quasi-Minimal Residual Method for Non-Hermitian Linear Systems,” SIAM J. on Sci. STAT Comp. Vol. 14, NO, 2, pp. 470-482, 1993.
25. Thomas, J. L., Taylor, S. L. and Anderson, W. K., “Navier-Stokes Computations of Vortical Flows over Low Aspect Ratio Wings,” AIAA Paper № 87-0207, Jan. 1987.
26. Yokota, J., “A Diagonally Inverted LU Implicit Multigrid Scheme for the 3-D Navier Stokes Equations and a Two Equation Model of Turbulence,” AIAA Paper № 89-0487, 1989.
27. Siikonen, T., “An Application of Roe’s Flux-Difference Splitting for k - € Turbulence Model,” Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol.21, pp. 1017-1039, 1995.
28. H. Dick, E. and Steelant, J., “Multigrid Solution of the Steady Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations Coupled to the k - e Turbulence Equations,” AIAA Paper № 95-1669, 1995.
29. Stanewsky, E., Puffert, W., Muller, R. and Bateman, T. E. B., “Supercritical Airfoil Cast 7, - Surface Pressure, Wake and Boundary Layer Measurements,” Aircfaft Research Association (ARA), Bedford, England. AGARD-AR-138 report.
30. Shuen, J.S. and Yoon. S., “Numerical Study of Chemically Reacting Flows Using Lower-Upper Symmetric Successive Overrelaxation Scheme,” AIAA J., Vol.27, №12, pp. 1752-1760, 1989.
31. Schroder, W. and Hartman, G., “Implicit Solutions of Three-Dimensional Viscous Hypersonic Flows,” Computers Fluids, Vol.21, №1, pp. 109-132,1992.
32. Shih, T. I.-P., “Approximate Factorization with Source Terms,” AIAA J., Vol.29, № 10, pp. 1759-1760, October 1991.