An MDO design methodology for the concurrent aerodynamic/cost design of MAGLEV vehicles

6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 501-513

  Tyll, J S ^a   Eagleshamt, M A ^a   Schetz, J A ^a   Deisenroth, M ^a   Mook, D T ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; MAGNETIC LEVITATION; MAGNETIC LEVITATION VEHICLES;

ACQUISITION COSTS; AERO-DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE; AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; AERODYNAMIC DESIGNS; AERODYNAMIC SHAPE; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PRELIMINARY DESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 84982318428     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-4036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Current State of the Art on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), An AIAA White Paper, Sept 1991.
2. US Army Corps of Engineers, US National Ma- glev Initiative. The GoE Final Summary MAGLEV Report. US Army Corps of Engineers, 1995.
3. Mook, Dean T., Dong, Bonian. “Perspective: Numerical Simulations of Wakes and Blade- Vortex Interaction”, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 116, pp. 5-21. 1994.
4. Ashby, Dale L., Iguchi, Steve K. Potential Flow Theory and Operation Guide for the Panel Code PMARC.12. 1992.
5. Schetz, Joseph A. Boundary Layer Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
6. Stratford, B.S., “The Prediction of Separation of the Turbulent Boundary Layer3’, J. Fluid Mechanics, vol. 5, pp. 1-16. 1959.
7. Leonard, A., “Vortex Methods for Flow Simulation”, J. of Computational Physics, vol. 37, pp. 289-335. 1980.
8. Siclari, M., Ende, R., Carpenter, G. “The Application of Navier-Stokes Computations to the Design of High-Speed, Low-Drag Magnetically Levitated (MAGLEV) Vehicle Shapes”, AIAA 95-1908, AIAA, June 1995.
9. Tyll, J.S., Liu, D., Schetz, J.A., Marchman, J.F. “Experimental Studies of MAGLEV Aerodynamics”, AIAA 95-1917, June 1995.
10. Liu, Ding Jen, Marshakov, Alex, Marchman, J.F., Schetz, J.A. “Aerodynamic Evaluation of Two Maglev Vehicle Designs”, SAE 960905, February 1996.
11. Raymer, Daniel P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. AIAA, Washington DC. 1992.
12. Harrison, J.A., et al., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas. “Magiev Cost Estimation: Capital Cost Elements”, Unpublished, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
13. DOT Users Manual, Version 4.00. VMA Engineering, 1993.
14. El Telbany, M. M. M., Reynolds, A.J. “Velocity Distributions in Plane Turbulent Channel Flows”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 100, pp. 1-29. 1980.
15. Maglev System Technical Requirements. EN- SCO, Inc. July 29, 1993.
16. Lever, J.H. “Technical Assessment of MAGLEV System Concepts”, US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, March, 1993.
17. Deutsch, L. “MAGLEV Cost and performance Parametric^’, Grumman Corporation, Beth- page, 1993.
18. Proise, M., Deutsch, L., Gran, R., Herbermann, R., Kalsi, S., Shaw, P. “System Concept Definition of the Grumman Superconducting Electromagnetic suspension (EMS) MAGLEV Design”, Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, 1993.
19. Hess, R.W., Romanoff, H.P. Aircraft Airframe Cost Estimating Relationships. Rand Corp., Rept. R-3255-af, Santa Monica, CA, 1987.
20. Degarmo, E.P., Sullivan, W.G., Bontadelli, J.A. Engineering Economy (Ninth edition). Macmillan, New York, 1993.
21. Johnson, Vicki S. “Minimizing Life Cycle Cost for Subsonic Commercial Aircraft”, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 27, pp. 139-145. 1990.