A multi-disciplinary study of aircraft aerodynamic surface smoothness requirements to reduce operating cost

7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 1266-1276

  Kundu, A K ^a   Watterson, J K ^a   Raghunathan, S ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AIRCRAFT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST REDUCTION; COSTS; DRAG; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MANUFACTURE; OPERATING COSTS;

AERODYNAMIC SURFACES; AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING; AIRCRAFT SURFACE; DIRECT OPERATING COSTS; MANUFACTURING COST; MANUFACTURING FEATURES; TOLERANCE ALLOCATION; TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS;

FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

EID: 84982318219     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rubbert, P. E. CFD and changing world of aircraft design. AIAA Wright Brothers Lecture (September 1994)
2. Kundu, A.K., Morris, W.H., & Raghunathan, S. CFD verification of excrescence drag. 35th AIAA Conference Paper No: AIAA 97-0354
3. Kundu, A.K., Raghunathan, S, & Morris, W. H. Effect of Manufacturing Tolerance on Aircraft Aerodynamics and Cost. WMC'97 Conference Paper No: 711-003, Nov, 1997
4. Jones, B. M. The Streamline Aeroplane, Journal of Ae. S., 192
5. Schlichting, H. Experimental investigation of the problems of surface roughness NACA TM 823 (1937)
6. Williams, D. H. & Brown, A.F. Tests on rivets and backward lap joints in compressed air tunnel. ARC R&M 1789 (1937)
7. Williams, D. H. & Brown, A.F. Experiment on riveted wing in the compressed air tunnel ARC R&M 1855 (1938)
8. Young, A. D. Serby, J.E. & Morris, D.E. Flight test on the effect of surface finish on wing drag. ARC R&M 2258 (1939)
9. Hood, M. J. The effects of some common surface irregularities on wing drag NACA TN 695(1939)
10. Wieghart, K. Increase of the turbulent frictional resistance caused by surface irregularities, NAP R&T No: 103 June 1946 (translation of FB 1563 ZWB 1942)
11. Gaudet, L., & Johnson, P. Measurement of the drag of various 2-D excrescences immersed in turbulent boundary layers at Mach numbers between 0.2 and 2.8. RAE TR 70190 (1970).
12. Gaudet, L & Winter, K. G. Measurement of drag of some characteristic aircraft excrescences in turbulent B-L. (RAE). AGARDCP 124 (1973)
13. Nash, J. H. and Bradshaw, P. The magnification of roughness drag by pressure gradients (NPL). Journal of R. Ae. Soc., UK, (January 1967).
14. Haines, A.B. Subsonic aircraft drag: An appreciation of present standards. Aeronaut. J. Vol 72 No:687 (March 1968).
15. Kranczock, M. Widerstandverbesserungs program VFW614, teil, Schaderlicher Ober flachen widerstand. VFW- Fokker, (1978)
16. Peterson, J. H., MacWilkenson, D., & Blackerby, W. A survey of drag prediction techniques applicable to subsonic and transonic aircraft design. AGARD CP 124 Paper 1. (1973)
17. ESDU data sheets (updated up to 1995)
18. Hoerner, S. F. Fluid Dynamic Drag (1965)
19. AGARD 264 Aircraft Excrescence Drag (81)
20. Chen, H. C., Yu, N.J., Rubbert, P.E, and Jameson, A. Flow simulation for general nacelle configurations using Euler equations. Conference paper No: AIAA 83-0539 (1983)
21. Uanishi, K., Pearson, N. S., Lahnig, T.R., and Leon, R.M. CFD-based 3D turbofan nacelle design system. AIAA paper No: A91-16278
22. Humphries, P., Gillan, M. & Raghunathan, S A study of Isolated Nacelle Flow at Subsonis and Supersonic Speeds. 36th AIAA Science Meeting AIAA paper No: 98-0946 (Jan 98)
23. Soderberg, R, Tolerance allocation in a CAD environment considering quality and manufacturing cost. IMC (1994)
24. Dong, Z, Hu, W. and Xue, D, New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance sysnthesis. Journal of Engineering for Industry (May 1994).
25. Sanchez, M., Kundu, A.K., Hinds, B.K & Raghunathan, S., A Methodology for assessing Cost due to Tolerance of Aerodynamic Surface Features of Turbofan Nacelles (accepted for publication in the Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology - IJAMT publication)