Scientific reproducibility, human error, and public policy

BioScience

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-6

  Elliott, Kevin C ^a   Resnik, David B ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982296269     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: 15253244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu197     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer C. 1995. Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review 85: 1337-1342.
2. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. 2003. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 289: 454-465.
3. Elliott KC, Resnik DB. 2014. Science, policy, and the transparency of values. Environmental Health Perspectives 122: 647-650.
4. Hergovich A, Schott R, Burger C. 2010. Biased evaluation of abstracts depending on topic and conclusion: Further evidence of a confirmation bias within scientific psychology. Current Psychology 29: 188-209.
5. Horel S, Bienkowski B. 2013. Special report: scientists critical of EU chemical policy have industry ties. Environmental Health News. (31 October 2014; www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2013/eu-conflict)
6. Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, Cronon B. 2013. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 64: 2-17.
7. Slovic P. 2000. The Perception of Risk. Routledge.
8. Solomon M. 2001. Social Empiricism. MIT Press.
9. Sulloway F. 1996. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics and Creative Lives. Pantheon Books.
10. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-1131.
11. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59: S251-S278.