Pathophysiology of the inner ear after blast injury caused by laser-induced shock wave

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Niwa, Katsuki ^a   Mizutari, Kunio ^a   Matsui, Toshiyasu ^a   Kurioka, Takaomi ^a   Matsunobu, Takeshi ^a   Kawauchi, Satoko ^a   Satoh, Yasushi ^a   Sato, Shunichi ^a   Shiotani, Akihiro ^a   Kobayashi, Yasushi ^a  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; ANIMAL; BLAST INJURY; INJURIES; INNER EAR; LASER; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BLAST INJURIES; EAR, INNER; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; LASERS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 84982182482     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep31754     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wolf, S. J., Bebarta, V. S., Bonnett, C. J., Pons, P. T. & Cantrill, S. V. Blast injuries. Lancet 374, 405-415, doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(09)60257-9 (2009).
2. Owens, B. D. et al. Combat wounds in operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma 64, 295-299, doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163b875 (2008).
3. DePalma, R. G., Burris, D. G., Champion, H. R. & Hodgson, M. J. Blast injuries. N Engl J Med 352, 1335-1342, doi: 10.1056/ NEJMra042083 (2005).
4. Shah, A., Ayala, M., Capra, G., Fox, D. & Hoffer, M. Otologic assessment of blast and nonblast injury in returning Middle Eastdeployed service members. Laryngoscope 124, 272-277, doi: 10.1002/lary.24169 (2014).
5. Gallun, F. J. et al. Implications of blast exposure for central auditory function: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 49, 1059-1074 (2012).
6. Remenschneider, A. K. et al. Otologic outcomes after blast injury: the Boston Marathon experience. Otol Neurotol 35, 1825-1834, doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000616 (2014).
7. Avidan, V. et al. Blast lung injury: clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcome. Am J Surg 190, 927-931, doi: 10.1016/j. amjsurg.2005.08.022 (2005).
8. Katz, E., Ofek, B., Adler, J., Abramowitz, H. B. & Krausz, M. M. Primary blast injury after a bomb explosion in a civilian bus. Ann Surg 209, 484-488 (1989).
9. Perez, R., Gatt, N. & Cohen, D. Audiometric configurations following exposure to explosions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126, 1249-1252 (2000).
10. Persaud, R., Hajioff, D., Wareing, M. & Chevretton, E. Otological trauma resulting from the Soho Nail Bomb in London, April 1999. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28, 203-206 (2003).
11. Mrena, R., Savolainen, S., Pirvola, U. & Ylikoski, J. Characteristics of acute acoustical trauma in the Finnish Defence Forces. Int J Audiol 43, 177-181 (2004).
12. Fausti, S. A., Wilmington, D. J., Gallun, F. J., Myers, P. J. & Henry, J. A. Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blastrelated traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 46, 797-810 (2009).
13. Cho, S. I. et al. Mechanisms of hearing loss after blast injury to the ear. Plos One 8, e67618, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067618 (2013).
14. Mao, J. C. et al. Blast-induced tinnitus and hearing loss in rats: behavioral and imaging assays. J Neurotrauma 29, 430-444, doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1934 (2012).
15. Sato, S. et al. Real-time optical diagnosis of the rat brain exposed to a laser-induced shock wave: observation of spreading depolarization, vasoconstriction and hypoxemia-oligemia. Plos One 9, e82891, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082891 (2014).
16. Kurioka, T. et al. Characteristics of laser-induced shock wave injury to the inner ear of rats. J Biomed Opt 19, 125001, doi: 10.1117/1. JBO.19.12.125001 (2014).
17. Buchwald, J. S. & Huang, C. Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science 189, 382-384 (1975).
18. Shera, C. A. & Guinan, J. J. Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105, 782-798 (1999).
19. Khimich, D. et al. Hair cell synaptic ribbons are essential for synchronous auditory signalling. Nature 434, 889-894, doi: 10.1038/ nature03418 (2005).
20. Liberman, M. C., Dodds, L. W. & Pierce, S. Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 301, 443-460, doi: 10.1002/cne.903010309 (1990).
21. Kujawa, S. G. & Liberman, M. C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29, 14077-14085 (2009).
22. Hudspeth, A. J. Making an effort to listen: mechanical amplification in the ear. Neuron 59, 530-545, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.012 (2008).
23. Nayak, G. D., Ratnayaka, H. S., Goodyear, R. J. & Richardson, G. P. Development of the hair bundle and mechanotransduction. Int J Dev Biol 51, 597-608, doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072392gn (2007).
24. Hamernik, R. P., Turrentine, G., Roberto, M., Salvi, R. & Henderson, D. Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea. Hear Res 13, 229-247 (1984).
25. Hamernik, R. P., Turrentine, G. & Wright, C. G. Surface morphology of the inner sulcus and related epithelial cells of the cochlea following acoustic trauma. Hear Res 16, 143-160 (1984).
26. Schaette, R. & McAlpine, D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 31, 13452-13457, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011 (2011).
27. Plack, C. J., Barker, D. & Prendergast, G. Perceptual consequences of "hidden" hearing loss. Trends Hear 18, 1-11, doi: 10.1177/ 2331216514550621 (2014).
28. Schaette, R., Turtle, C. & Munro, K. J. Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss. Plos One 7, e35238, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035238 (2012).
29. Hickox, A. E. & Liberman, M. C. Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus? J Neurophysiol 111, 552-564, doi: 10.1152/jn.00184.2013 (2014).
30. Saunders, G. H. et al. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev 52, 343-360, doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 (2015).
31. Dougherty, A. L. et al. Blast-related ear injuries among U.S. military personnel. J Rehabil Res Dev 50, 893-904, doi: 10.1682/ JRRD.2012.02.0024 (2013).
32. Wang, H., Yin, S., Yu, Z., Huang, Y. & Wang, J. Dynamic changes in hair cell stereocilia and cochlear transduction after noise exposure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 409, 616-621, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.049 (2011).
33. Liberman, M. C. Chronic ultrastructural changes in acoustic trauma: serial-section reconstruction of stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res 26, 65-88 (1987).
34. Liberman, M. C. & Dodds, L. W. Acute ultrastructural changes in acoustic trauma: serial-section reconstruction of stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res 26, 45-64 (1987).
35. Jia, S., Yang, S., Guo, W. & He, D. Z. Fate of mammalian cochlear hair cells and stereocilia after loss of the stereocilia. J Neurosci 29, 15277-15285, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3231-09.2009 (2009).
36. Indzhykulian, A. A. et al. Molecular remodeling of tip links underlies mechanosensory regeneration in auditory hair cells. Plos Biol 11, e1001583, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001583 (2013).
37. Zhao, Y., Yamoah, E. N. & Gillespie, P. G. Regeneration of broken tip links and restoration of mechanical transduction in hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 15469-15474 (1996).
38. Kitajiri, S. et al. Actin-bundling protein TRIOBP forms resilient rootlets of hair cell stereocilia essential for hearing. Cell 141, 786-798, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.049 (2010).
39. Satoh, Y. et al. Pulmonary blast injury in mice: a novel model for studying blast injury in the laboratory using laser-induced stress waves. Lasers in surgery and medicine 42, 313-318, doi: 10.1002/lsm.20899 (2010).
40. Turner, J. G. et al. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav Neurosci 120, 188-195, doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.1.188 (2006).
41. Viberg, A. & Canlon, B. The guide to plotting a cochleogram. Hear Res 197, 1-10, doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.04.016 (2004).