Determination of in vitro digestibility of tropical feeds using cattle faeces as rumen fluid alternative

Media Peternakan

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 207-211

  Utomo, R ^a   Soejono, M ^a   Widyobroto, B P ^a   Sudirman, ^b  

^a GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b MATARAM UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Faecal solution; In vitro; Organic matter digestibility; Regression equation; Rumen fluid

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982126297     PISSN: 01260472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5398/medpet.2011.34.3.207     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abdullah, L. & Suharlina. 2010. Herbage yield and quality of two vegetative parts of indigofera at diff erent times of first regrowth defoliation. Med. Pet. 33: 44-49.
2. Adesogan, A. T. 2004. Effect of bag type on the apparent digestibility of feeds in ANKOM DaisyII incubators. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 119: 333-344.
3. Akhter, S., E. Owen, M. K. Theodorou, E. A. Butler, & D. J. Minson. 1999. Bovine faeces as a source of micro-organisms for the in vitro digestibility assay of forages. Grass Forage Sci. 54: 219-226.
4. Bauer, E., B. A. Williams, M. W. Bosch, C. Voigt, R. Mosenthin, & M. W. A. Verstegen. 2004. Differences in microbial activity of digesta from three section of the porcine large intestine according to in-vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84: 2097-2104.
5. Damiran, D., T. DelCurto , D. W. Bohnert, & S. L. Findholt. 2008. Comparison of techniques and grinding sizeto estimate digestibility of forage based ruminant diets. J. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 141:15-35
6. Dhanoa, M. S., J. France, L. A. Crompton, R. M. Mauricio, E. Kebreab, J. A. N. Mill, R. Sanderson, R. Dijkstra, & S. Lopez. 2004. Technical note: A proposed method to determine the extent of degradation of a feed in the in vitro gas production technique using feces as the inoculum. J. Anim Sci. 82: 733-746.
7. Gomez, A. A. & A. A. Gomez. 2007. Prosedur Statistik untuk Penelitian Pertanian. Edisi ke dua. Terjemahan: E. Sjamsuddin & J.S. Baharsjah. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.
8. Harris, L. E. 1970. Chemical and Biological Methods for Feed analysis. Center For Tropical Agric. Feed Composition Project. Livestock Pavilion, University of Florida. Gainesville, Florida.
9. Mahadevamma, S., T. R. Shamala, & R. N. Tharanathan. 2004. Resistant starch derived from processed legumes: in vitro and in vivo fermentation characteristics. Int. J. Food Sci. and Nutr. 55: 399-405.
10. Mauricio, R. M., E. Owen, F. L. Mould, I. Givens, M. K. Theodorou, J. France, D. R. Davies, & M. S. Dhanoa. 2001. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech 89: 33-48.
11. Omed, H.M., D.K. Lovett, & R.F.E. Axford. 2000. Faeses as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility. In: D. I. Givens, E. Owen, R. F. E. Axford, & H. M. Omed. (Editors). Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CAB International, pp. 135-154.
12. Palic, D. V. & Klaas-Jan Leeuw. 2009. Comparison of three in vitro methods for determining and predicting the organic matter digestibility of complete diets for ruminants. Acta Periodica Technologica, APTEFF 40: 79-82.
13. Sudirman. 2007. Kajian dan validasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi penggunaan feses kerbau sebagai pengganti cairan rumen dalam penetapan kecernaan in vitro pakan di daerah tropik. Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
14. Utomo, R. 2010. Modifi kasi metode penetapan kecernaaan in vitro bahan kering atau bahan organik. Buletin Sintesis. Yayasan Dharma Agrika Semarang 5: 1-11.
15. Williams, B. A. 2000. Cumulative gas-production Techniques for forage evaluation. In: D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford and H.M. Omed. (Editors), Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CAB International, pp. 189-213.