Stakeholder involvement in health technology assessment at national level: A study from Iran

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 181-189

  Yazdizadeh, Bahareh ^a   Shahmoradi, Safoura ^a   Majdzadeh, Reza ^b   Doaee, Shila ^c   Bazyar, Mohammad ^d   Souresrafil, Aghdas ^d   Olyaeemanesh, Alireza ^d  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences   (Iran)

^d TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

HTA; HTA at National Level; Iran; organizing HTA; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE;

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; INTEREST GROUPS; IRAN; NATIONAL LEVEL; ORGANIZING HTA; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EXPECTATION; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; RESPONSIBILITY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; INTERVIEW; IRAN; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; IRAN; POLICY MAKING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84982111840     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462316000167     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Oortwijn W, Mathijssen J, Banta D. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries. Health Policy. 2010;95:174-184.
2. Facey K. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) glossary. Alberta, Canada: INAHTA; 2006.
3. OECD. The OECD Health Project: Health technology and decision making. Paris Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2005 http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/(accessed September 13, 2010).
4. Nielsen CP, Lauritsen SW, Kristensen FB, et al. Involving stakeholders and developing a policy for stakeholder involvement in the European network for health technology assessment, EUnetHTA. Int J Technol Assess. 2009;25(Suppl 2):84-91.
5. EUnetHTA Work Package 8. EUnetHTA Handbook on Health Technology Assessment Capacity Building. Barcelona, Spain: Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research; 2008.
6. Doaee S, Olyaeemanesh A, Emami S, et al. Development and implementation of health technology assessment: A policy study. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(Suppl 1):50-54.
7. Doaee S, Oliyaeemanesh A, Nejati M, et al. Establishment of health technology assessment in Iran. J Fam Reprod Health. 2012;6.
8. Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME). The General Health Policies in Islamic Republic of Iran. 2014. http://www.behdasht. gov.ir/?siteid=1&siteid=1&pageid=1508&newsview=105234 (accessed on: 2014 June 15, 2014).
9. The Health Policy Council (HPC) of Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME). The roadmap for health sector reform. Tehran: MOHME; 2012 [In Persian].
10. Pinson N, Thielke A, King V. Health technology assessment (rapid review). Medicaid Evidence-based Decisions Project (MED). Portland; Oregon Health & Science University; 2011.
11. Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Canada: Diversity and evolution. Med J Aust. 2007;187:286.
12. Healy P, Pugatch M. Theory versus practice: Discussing the governance of health technology assessment systems. Stockholm: Stockholm Network; 2009.
13. McDaid D. Co-ordinating health technology assessment in Canada: A European perspective. Health Policy. 2003;63:205-213.
14. Menon D. Health technology assessment in Canada: A ten year review. Part 2. Edmonton, Canada: Institute of Health EconomicsWorking Paper 00-5. 2000.
15. Department of Health and Ageing. Health technology assessment. 2011. Updated June 16, 2012. http://www.health.gov.au/hta (accessed July 10, 2012).
16. NIHR. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. 2014. http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta (accessed September 20, 2014).
17. Banta D, Almeida R. The development of health technology assessment in Brazil. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):255-259.
18. Ferraz M, Soárez P, Zucchi P. Health technology assessment in Brazil: What do healthcare system players think about it? Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;129:198-205.
19. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative methods in health research, in qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
20. Gauvin F-P, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN. It all depends: Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1518-1526.
21. Frels RK, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Interviewing the interpretive researcher: An impressionist tale. Qual Report. 2012;17:1-27.
22. NIHR. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Tehran. 2014. [cited August 20, 2014] nihr.tums.ac.ir [In Persian].
23. Department of Health and Ageing in Australia. Stakeholder consultation. 2011 http://www.health.gov.au/internet/hta/publishing.nsf/Content/review-1#stakeholder (accessed April 20, 2015).
24. NICE. Developing technology appraisal guidance: A factsheet for patient and carer groups. London: NICE; 2014.
25. EUnetHTA. EUnetHTA JA Stakeholder involvement policy. 2010 http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/eunethta-ja-stakeholder-involvement-policy (accessed April 25, 2015).