Cloud Phase Changes Induced by CO2 Warming—a Powerful yet Poorly Constrained Cloud-Climate Feedback

Current Climate Change Reports

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 288-296

  Storelvmo, Trude ^a   Tan, Ivy ^a   Korolev, Alexei V ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cloud phase; Cloud climate feedback; Clouds; Global climate modeling; Satellite observations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981762625     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21986061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0026-2     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Mitchell JFB, Senior CA, Ingram WJ. Co2 and climate—a missing feedback. Nature. 1989;341(6238):132–4
2. Pruppacher HR, Klett JD. Microphysics of clouds and precipitation. Atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 954
3. Li ZX, Le Treut H. Cloud-radiation feedbacks in a general-circulation model and their dependence on cloud modeling assumptions. Clim Dyn. 1992;7(3):133–9
4. Cess RD et al. Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general-circulation models. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 1990;95(D10):16601–15
5. Cess RD et al. Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: an update. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 1996;101(D8):12791–4
6. Zelinka MD, Klein SA, Hartmann DL. Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part I: cloud radiative kernels. J Clim. 2012;25(11):3715–35
7. Curry JA et al. Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics. J Clim. 1996;9(8):1731–64
8. Boucher O, Randall D, Artaxo P, Bretherton C, Feingold G, Forster P, Kerminen VM, Kondo Y, Liao H, Lohmann U, Rasch P, Satheesh SK, Sherwood S, Stevens B, Zhang XY. Clouds and Aerosols, in Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM. Editor. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 2013p. 571–658
9. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA. An overview of Cmip5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2012;93(4):485–98
10. Senior CA, Mitchell JFB. Carbon dioxide and climate—the impact of cloud parameterization. J Clim. 1993;6(3):393–418
11. McAvaney BJ, Le Treut H. The cloud feedback intercomparison project (CFMIP), in CLIVAR Exchanges. United Kingdom: International CLIVAR Project Office: Southampton; 2003. p. 1–4
12. Zelinka MD, Klein SA, Hartmann DL. Computing and partitioning cloud feedbacks using cloud property histograms. Part II: attribution to changes in cloud amount, altitude, and optical depth. J Clim. 2012;25(11):3736–54
13. Zelinka MD et al. Contributions of different cloud types to feedbacks and rapid adjustments in CMIP5. J Clim. 2013;26(14):5007–27
14. Tselioudis G, Rossow WB. Global, multiyear variations of optical-thickness with temperature in low and cirrus clouds. Geophys Res Lett. 1994;21(20):2211–4
15. Tselioudis G, Rossow WB, Rind D. Global patterns of cloud optical-thickness variation with temperature. J Clim. 1992;5(12):1484–97
16. Feigelson E. Preliminary radiation model of a cloudy atmosphere. I—structure of clouds and solar radiation. Beitraege zur Physik der Atmosphaere. 1978;51(3):203–29
17. Somerville RCJ, Remer LA. Cloud optical-thickness feedbacks in the Co2 climate problem. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 1984;89(D6):9668–72
18. Gordon ND, Klein SA. Low-cloud optical depth feedback in climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2014;11910:p. 2013JD021052
19. Vavrus S et al. Simulations of 20th and 21st century Arctic cloud amount in the global climate models assessed in the IPCC AR4. Clim Dyn. 2009;33(7-8):1099–115
20. Ceppi P, Hartmann D. Connections between clouds, radiation, and midlatitude dynamics: a review. Curr Clim Chang Rep. 2015;1(2):94–102
21. Tsushima Y et al. Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study. Clim Dyn. 2006;27(2-3):113–26
22. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT. Simulation of present-day and twenty-first-century energy budgets of the Southern Oceans. J Clim. 2010;23(2):440–54
23. McCoy DT, Hartmann DL, Grosvenor DP. Observed Southern Ocean Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection Part 2: phase changes and low cloud feedback. Journal of Climate. 2014
24. Choi YS et al. Influence of cloud phase composition on climate feedbacks. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2014;119(7):3687–700
25. Korolev AV et al. Microphysical characterization of mixed-phase clouds. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2003;129(587):39–65
26. Korolev A et al. Improved airborne hot-wire measurements of ice water content in clouds. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2013;30(9):2121–31
27. Winker DM et al. Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2009;26(11):2310–23
28. Hu YX, et al, Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2010;115
29. Choi YS et al. Space observations of cold-cloud phase change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(25):11211–6
30. Giraud V et al. Analysis of direct comparison of cloud top temperature and infrared split window signature against independent retrievals of cloud thermodynamic phase. Geophys Res Lett. 2001;28(6):983–6
31. Doutriaux-Boucher M, Quaas J. Evaluation of cloud thermodynamic phase parametrizations in the LMDZ GCM by using POLDER satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters. 2004;316
32. Tan I, Storelvmo T, Choi Y-S. A comparison of the ice nucleating efficiencies of clean dust, polluted dust, and smoke aerosols in mixed-phase clouds based on spaceborne lidar observations. J Geophys Res. 2014;119(11):6653–65
33. Murray BJ et al. Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(19):6519–54
34. Morrison H, Gettelman A. A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: description and numerical tests. J Clim. 2008;21(15):3642–59
35. Lohmann U et al. Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007;7(13):3425–46
36. Storelvmo T, Kristjansson JE, Lohmann U. Aerosol influence on mixed-phase clouds in CAM-Oslo. J Atmos Sci. 2008;65(10):3214–30
37. Hoose C et al. A classical-theory-based parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation by mineral dust, soot, and biological particles in a global climate model. J Atmos Sci. 2010;67(8):2483–503
38. Phillips VTJ, DeMott PJ, Andronache C. An empirical parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation for multiple chemical species of aerosol. J Atmos Sci. 2008;65(9):2757–83
39. DeMott PJ et al. Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(25):11217–22
40. Storelvmo T, et al., Modeling of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process-implications for aerosol indirect effects. Environmental Research Letters. 2008;34
41. Komurcu M et al. Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2014;119(6):3372–400
42. Ahlgrimm M, Forbes R. Improving the representation of low clouds and drizzle in the ECMWF model based on ARM observations from the Azores. Mon Weather Rev. 2014;142(2):668–85
43. Cesana G, Chepfer H. Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO-GOCCP. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2013;118(14):7922–37
44. Cesana, G., et al., Multimodel evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2015;120:15: p. 2014JD022932
45. Haynes JM et al. Major characteristics of Southern Ocean cloud regimes and their effects on the energy budget. J Clim. 2011;24(19):5061–80
46. Stephens GL et al. An update on Earth’s energy balance in light of the latest global observations. Nat Geosci. 2012;5(10):691–6
47. Meyers MP, Demott PJ, Cotton WR. New primary ice-nucleation parameterizations in an explicit cloud model. J Appl Meteorol. 1992;31(7):708–21
48. Young KC. Conversion of a supercooled cloud to ice via contact nucleation and direct injection of ice crystals. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1974;55(6):679
49. DeMott PJ et al. Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15(1):393–409