Effects of alarm modality and alarm reliability on workload, trust, and driving performance

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 1535-1539

  Shah, Smruti J ^a   Bliss, James P ^a   Chancey, Eric T ^a   Christopher Brill, J ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; ERGONOMICS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

DRIVER ERROR; DRIVER PERFORMANCE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; ROADWAY SAFETY; SIMULATED ENVIRONMENT; SITUATION AWARENESS;

ALARM SYSTEMS;

EID: 84981724929     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591332     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Baldwin, C. L., Lewis, B. A. (2014). Perceived urgency mapping across modalities within a driving context. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 1270-1277. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.002
2. nd Annual Meeting, 32, 150-154. Moffett Field, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi: 10.1177/154193128803200232
3. Bliss, J. P., & Acton, S. A. (2003). Alarm mistrust in automobiles: How collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.07.003
4. Bliss, J. P., Liebman, R., & Brill, J. C. (2010). Alert modality and behavioral compliance during virtual combat. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, 2373-2377. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi: 10.1518/107118110X12829370499204
5. th Annual Meeting, 1701-1705. Chicago, IL. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi: 10.1177/1541931214581355
6. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2012). G∗Power 3.1.7: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
8. Golding, J. F. (2006). Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012
9. Jian, J., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(53), 53-71.
10. th Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1899-1903. San Diego, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi: 10.1177/1541931213571423
11. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50-30392
12. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D. A., & Lacson, F. C. (2006). Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated AIDS. Human Factors, 48(2), 241-256. doi: 10.1518/001872006777724408
13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013a). Traffic safety facts: Early estimates of motor vehicle traffic fatalities in 2012. DOT HS 811 741, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
14. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013b). In National Highway Traffic Safety's online digest of distracted driving laws. Retrieved from http://www.distraction. gov/content/get-the-facts/statelaws.html
15. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253. doi: 10.1518/001872097778543886
16. Scott, J. J., & Gray, R. (2008). A Comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Human Factors, 50(2), 264-275. doi: 10.1518/001872(H)8X250674.
17. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159-177. doi: 10.1080/14639220210123806
18. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(3), 201-212. doi: 10.1080/14639220500370105