Response to Dr P. J. Kramer's article, ‘Changing concepts regarding plant water relations’. Volume 11, Number 7, pp. 565–568

Plant, Cell & Environment

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 1988, Pages 569-571

  PASSIOURA, J B ^a  

^a CSIRO PLANT INDUSTRY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981608604     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: 13653040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01797.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status
2. Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying
3. Transpiration of soybean as related to leaf area, root length, and soil water content
4. Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves
5. Does leaf turgor determine leaf expansion rates in dry or saline soil
6. The meaning of matric potential
7. Hydraulic resistance of plants. I: Constant or variable
8. Who taught plants thermodynamics? The unfulfilled potential of plant water potential
9. Shoot turgor does not limit shoot growth of NaCl‐affected wheat and barley
10. The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. II: In the mesophytic herbaceous species Helianthus annuus