We try harder: Some reflections on configurational theory and methods

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 303-309

  Ketchen, David J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981510558     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038017     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
2. Fiss, P. (2007). Towards a set-theoretic approach for studying organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198.
3. Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420.
4. Ketchen, D. J., and Thomas., J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1278-1313.
5. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
6. Short, J. C., and Payne., G. T., & Ketchen, D. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34, 1053-1079.
7. Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121-132.