The analysis of temporally ordered configurations: Challenges and solutions

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 107-127

  Hak, Tony ^a   Jaspers, Ferdinand ^a   Dul, Jan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Necessary condition; Sufficient condition; Temporal Necessary Condition Analysis (TNCA); Temporal Qualitative Comparative Analysis (TQCA); Temporally ordered configurations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981503233     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038009     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods. Organization Science, 1(4), 375-392.
2. Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 93-113.
3. Caren, N., & Panofsky, A. (2005). TQCA: A technique for adding temporality to qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 34, 147-171.
4. Dul, J., Hak, T., Goertz, G., & Voss, C. (2010). Necessary condition hypotheses in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(11), 1170-1190.
5. Gordon, S. R. (2011). Entrepreneurial discovery and exploitation processes: Sequence or symbiosis? Paper presented at Babson College Entrepreneurial Research Conference, June 9-11 2011, Syracuse, NY.
6. Heise, D. R. (1989). Modeling event structures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14, 139-169.
7. Krook, M. L. (2006). Temporality and causal configurations: combining sequence analysis and fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 31-September 3, 2006.
8. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
9. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 43(5), 583-598.
10. De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Yamasaki, S. (2009). Addressing the critiques of QCA. In B. Rihoux & C. R. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods (pp. 147-165). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
11. Meyer, A. D., and Tsui., A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.
12. Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Morse, E. A. (1998). The temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial growth: An event structure analysis in an entrepreneurial firm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
14. Pettigrew, A. M. (1999). What is processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
15. Ragin, C. R. (1987). The comparative method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16. Ragin, C. R., & Schneider, G. A. (2011). Case-oriented theory building and theory testing. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 150-166). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
17. Ragin, C. R., & Strand, S. I. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 431-441.
18. Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. T. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 155-307.