Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Hill, Jonathan C ^a   Kang, Sujin ^b   Benedetto, Elena ^b   Myers, Helen ^a   Blackburn, Steven ^a   Smith, Stephanie ^b   Dunn, Kate M ^a   Hay, Elaine ^a   Rees, Jonathan ^b   Beard, David ^b   Glyn Jones, Sion ^b   Barker, Karen ^b   Ellis, Benjamin ^c   Fitzpatrick, Ray ^b   Price, Andrew ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Arthritis Research UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cohort studies; Outcome Assessment; Questionnaires; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PATHWAY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY; COMPREHENSION; CONSENSUS; EMOTIONAL STABILITY; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HIP; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INTERVIEW; KEELE MSK PROM SCORE; KNEE; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; MUSCULOSKELETAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALIST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP KNEE SHOULDER SCORE; PAIN; PAIN SEVERITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; READING; SCIENTIST; SECONDARY HEALTH CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SHOULDER; SLEEP; SOCIAL ASPECT; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM; WORK; WORKSHOP; AGED; ANALGESIA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; CONSENSUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MANAGEMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84981342155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012331     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, national incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386:743-800.
2. NHS England. The NHS belongs to the people: a call to action. London: NHS England 2013. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2013/07/call-to-action/(accessed 28th July 2016).
3. Department of Health. The musculoskeletal services framework: a joint responsibility: doing it differently. London: DoH; 2006. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh. gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-4138412.pdf (accessed 28th July 2016).
4. Kamaleri Y, Natvig B, Ihlebaek CM, et al. Localized or widespread musculoskeletal pain: does it matter? Pain 2008;138:41-6.
5. Hartvigsen J, Natvig B, Ferreira M. Is it all about a pain in the back? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013;27:613-23.
6. Porcheret M, Jordan K, Jinks C, et al. Primary care treatment of knee pain-a survey in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1694-700.
7. Somerville S, Hay E, Lewis M, et al. Content and outcome of usual primary care for back pain: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:790-7.
8. Imison CNC, Goodwin N, Buck D, et al. Transforming our health care system: ten priorities for commissioners. The Kings Fund, 2011.
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patientreported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-79
10. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Patient Reported Outcome Measures. London: HSCIC; 2015. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/proms (accessed 28th July 2016).
11. National Institute for Health Research. Budgeting for involvement: Practical advice on budgeting for actively involving the public in research studies. London: NIHR 2013. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/get-involved/INVOLVEMHRNBudgeting09Jul2013.pdf (accessed 28th July 2016).
12. Delbecq AaV, AH. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 1971;VII:466-91.
13. Lewis C. Using the thinking-aloud method in cognitive interface design. Technical Report IBM Research Report RC 9265, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1982.
14. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727-36.
15. Khan KA, Madan J, Petrou S, et al. Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and generic preference-based measures. Value Health 2014;17:686-95.
16. Hill JC, Thomas E, Hill S, et al. Development and validation of the Keele Musculoskeletal Patient Reported Outcome Measure (MSK-PROM). PLoS One 2015;10:e0124557.
17. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009;17:163-70.
18. Bond TaFC. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd edn. Mahwah N, ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007.
19. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, et al. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:54.
20. Legendre P. Species associations: the Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2005;10: 226-45.
21. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
22. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med 1987;6:441-8.
23. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, why? Qual Life Res 2009;18:115-23.
24. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2003-13.
25. Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, et al. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. J Pain 2014;15:569-85.
26. Altman R, Brandt K, Hochberg M, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Results from a workshop. Osteoarthr Cartil 1996;4:217-43.
27. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997;24:799-802.
28. Dougados M, Leclaire P, van der Heijde D, et al. Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials response criteria initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 2000;8:395-403.
29. ICF. ICF Coresets for musculoskeletal conditions [01/04/2016]. https://www.icf-research-branch.org/icf-core-sets-projects2/musculoskeletal-conditions
30. Ellis B, FP, Hill JC, Price A. Bridging the musculoskeletal measurement gap. J Trauma Orthop 2104;02.