Predictors of retention in a randomised trial of smoking cessation in low-socioeconomic status Australian smokers

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 64, Issue , 2017, Pages 13-20

  Courtney, Ryan J ^a   Clare, Philip ^a   Boland, Veronica ^a   Martire, Kristy A ^a,b   Bonevski, Billie ^c   Hall, Wayne ^d   Siahpush, Mohammad ^e   Borland, Ron ^f   Doran, Christopher M ^g   West, Robert ^h   Farrell, Michael ^a   Mattick, Richard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

^g CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Method; Randomized controlled trial; Retention; Smoking cessation; Socioeconomic factors

Indexed keywords

ADVERTISING; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; OPEN STUDY; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CIGARETTE SMOKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POVERTY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REMINDER SYSTEM; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POVERTY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84981328328     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: 18736327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baker, A., Richmond, R., Haile, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention among people with psychotic disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry 163 (2006), 1934–1942.
2. Baker, A., Richmond, R., Haile, M., et al. Characteristics of smokers with a psychotic disorder and implications for smoking interventions. Psychiatry Research 150 (2007), 141–152.
3. Beaver, K.M., Intelligence and selective attrition in a nationally representative and longitudinal sample of Americans. Personality and Individual Differences 55 (2013), 157–161.
4. Belita, E., Sidani, S., Attrition in smoking cessation studies. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 47 (2015), 21–40.
5. Blumental, D.S., Sung, J., Coates, R., et al. Recruitment and retention of subjects for a longitudinal cancer prevention study in an inner-city black community. Health Services Research 30 (1995), 197–205.
6. Bobak, M., Jarvis, M.J., Skodova, Z., et al. Smoke intake among smokers is higher in lower socioeconomic groups. Tobacco Control 9 (2000), 310–312.
7. Boneski, B., Twyman, L., Paul, C., et al. Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial. BMJ Open, 5, 2015, e008419.
8. Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 2014, 42.
9. Borland, R., Understanding hard to maintain behaviour change: A dual process approach. 2013, Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex: UK.
10. Borrelli, B., Hogan, J.W., Bock, B., et al. Predictors of quitting and dropout among women in a clinic-based smoking cessation program. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 16 (2002), 22–27.
11. Bowen, D.J., McTiernan, A., Powers, D., et al. Recruiting women into a smoking cessation program: Who might quit?. Women & Health 31 (2000), 41–58.
12. Bryant, J., Bonevski, B., Paul, C., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups. Addiction 106 (2011), 1568–1585.
13. Collins, B.N., Wileyto, E.P., Hovell, M.F., et al. Proactive recruitment predicts participant retention to end of treatment in a secondhand smoke reduction trial with low-income maternal smokers. Translational Behavioral Medicine 1 (2011), 394–399.
14. Courtney, R.J., Bradford, D., Martire, K.A., et al. A randomized clinical trial of a financial education intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for low socio-economic status Australian smokers: a study protocol. Addiction 109 (2014), 1602–1611.
15. Courtney, R.J., Naicker, S., Shakeshaft, A., et al. Smoking cessation among low-socioeconomic status and disadvantaged population groups: A systematic review of research output. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (2015), 6403–6422.
16. Cunningham, R., Walton, M.A., Tripathi, S.P., et al. Tracking inner city subtance users from the emergency department: how many contacts does it take?. Academic Emergency Medicine 15 (2008), 136–143.
17. Curtin, L., Brown, R.A., Sales, S.D., Determinants of attrition from cessation treatment in smokers with a history of major depressive disorder. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 14 (2000), 134–142.
18. de Graaf, R., Bijl, R.V., Smit, F., et al. Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). American Journal of Epidemiology 152 (2000), 1039–1047.
19. Deeg, D.J., van Tilburg, T., Smit, J.H., et al. Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55 (2002), 319–328.
20. El-Khorazaty, N.M., Johnson, A.A., Kiely, M., et al. Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioural intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy. BMC Public Health, 7, 2007, 233.
21. Ellenberg, J.H., Selection bias in observational and experimental studies. Statistics in Medicine 13 (1994), 557–567.
22. Festinger, D.S., Marlowe, D.B., Dugosh, K.L., et al. Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 96 (2008), 128–135.
23. Fortman, S.P., Killen, J.D., Who shall quit? Comparison of volunteer and population-based recruitment in two minimal-contact smoking cessation studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 140 (1994), 39–51.
24. Goldberg, M., Francois Chastang, J., Zins, M., et al. Health problems were the strongest predictors of attrition during follow-up of the GAZEL cohort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 (2006), 1213–1221.
25. Graham, A.L., Papandonatos, G.D., DePue, J.D., et al. Lifetimes characteristics of participants and non-participants in a smoking cessation trial: Implications for external validity and public health impact. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35 (2008), 295–307.
26. Greenberger, P., Knab, S., Society workshop investigates barriers to recruitment and retention of women in clinical research. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 9 (2000), 817–818.
27. Hunt, J.R., White, E., Retaining and tracking cohort study members. Epidemiologic Reviews 20 (1998), 57–70.
28. Hyland, A., Borland, R., Yong, H.H., et al. Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) four country survey. Tobacco Control 15 (2006), iii83–iii94.
29. Kim, R., Kickman, N., Gali, K., et al. Maximising retention with high risk participants in a clinical trial. American Journal of Health Promotion 28 (2014), 268–274.
30. Leak, C., Goggins, K., Schildcrout, J.S., et al. Effect of health literacy on research follow-up. Journal of Health Communication 20 (2015), 83–91.
31. Lee, S., Hayes, R.B., McQuaid, E.L., et al. Predictors of retention in smoking cessation treatment among Latino smokers in the Northeat United States. Health Education Research 25 (2010), 687–697.
32. Leeman, R.F., Quiles, Z.N., Molinelli, L.A., et al. Attrition in a multi-component smoking cessation study for females. Tobacco Induced Diseases 3 (2006), 59–71.
33. Leon, A.C., Demirtas, H., Hedeker, D., Bias reduction with an adjustment for participants' intent to drop out of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Trials 4 (2007), 540–547.
34. Lugtig, P., Panel attrition: Seperating stayers, fast attriters, gradual attriters, and lurkers. Sociological Methods & Research 43 (2014), 699–733.
35. Lynham, D., Moffitt, T., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Explaining the relation between IQ and deliniquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self control?. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102 (1993), 187–196.
36. Mapstone, J., Elbourne, D., Roberts, I., Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 18, 2007, MR000013.
37. Morrison, T.C., Wahlgreen, D.R., Hovell, M.F., et al. Tracking and follow-up of 19,915 adolescents: minimizing attrition bias. Controlled Clinical Trials 18 (1997), 383–396.
38. Namenek Brouwer, R.J., Pomerleau, C.S., “Prequit attrition” among weight-concerned women smokers. Eating Behaviors 1 (2000), 145–151.
39. Nevid, J.S., Javier, R.A., Moulton, J.L., Factors predicting participant attrition in a community-based, culturally specific smoking cessation program for Hispanic smokers. Health Psychology 15 (1996), 226–229.
40. Nicholson, L.M., Schwirian, P.M., Klein, E.G., et al. Recruitment and retention stratagies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. Contemporary Clinical Trials 32 (2011), 353–362.
41. Nowak, C., Sharif, F., Eischen, S., et al. Retention of homeless smokers in the Power to Quit study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2014 (In press).
42. Paul, C., Ross, S., Bryant, J., et al. The social context of smoking: A qualitative study comparing smoking of high versus low socioeconomic position. BMC Public Health, 10, 2010, 211.
43. Ramos-Gomez, F., Chung, L.H., Gonzalez Beristain, R., et al. Recruiting and retaining pregnant women from a community health center at the US–Mexico border for the Mothers and Youth Access clinical trial. Clinical Trials 5 (2008), 336–346.
44. Robinson, K.A., Dennison, C.R., Wayman, D.M., et al. Sytematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (2007), 757–765.
45. Severi, E., Free, C., Knight, R., et al. Two controlled trials to increase participant retention in a randomized controlled trial of mobile phone-based smoking cessation support in the United Kingdom. Clinical Trials 8 (2011), 654–660.
46. Shelley, D., Cantrell, J., Wong, S., et al. Smoking cessation among sheltered homeless: A pilot. American Journal of Health Behavior 34 (2010), 544–552.
47. Shih, W.J., Problems in dealing with missing data and informative censoring in clinical trials. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 3, 2002, 4.
48. Siahpush, M., McNeill, A., Borland, R., et al. Socioecononomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit accross four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) survey. Tobacco Control 15 (2006), iii71–iii75.
49. Siddiqui, O., Flay, B.R., Hu, F.B., Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. Preventive Medicine 25 (1996), 554–560.
50. Sprauge, S., Leece, P., Bhandri, M., et al. Limiting loss to follow up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Controlled Clinical Trials 24 (2003), 719–725.
51. StataCorp., Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station. 2013, StataCorp LP, TX.
52. Szklo, M., Nieto, F.J., Epidemiology, Beyond the Basics. 3rd ed., 2012, Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Ma.
53. Toerin, M., Brookes, S.T., Metcalfe, C., et al. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials, 10, 2009, 52.
54. Twisk, J., de Vente, W., Attrition in longitudinal studies. How to deal with missing data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55 (2002), 329–337.
55. Woolard, R.H., Carty, K., Wirtz, P., et al. Research fundamentals: Follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: Addressing subject attrition. Academic Emergency Medicine 11 (2004), 859–866.